ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004517
The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 20 September 2004 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial, AR 635-200, Chapter 10, KFS, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: Bravo Company, 232d Medical Battalion, 32d Medical Brigade, Fort Sam Houston, TX f. Enlistment Date/Term: 16 April 2004, 3 years g. Current...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004519
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 29 December 2006 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Pattern of Misconduct , AR 635-200, Chapter 14 paragraph 14-12b, JKA, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: D Co, 526th Brigade Support Battalion, 2nd Brigade Combat Team, Fort Campbell, KY f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 1 March 2006, 3 years and 18 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 9 months, 29 days h. Total Service: 2 years, 3 months, 17 days/block 12e on the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004521
She requests that her discharge be upgraded to honorable because she maintained her Army core values at all times as a Soldier. On 26 February 2010, the separation authority, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, after examining the applicants record of service, her military records, and the issues submitted with the application, there are insufficient factors to merit an...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004529
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 May 2007; he was 17 years old at the time of entry and had a GED Certificate. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004542
On 8 October 2008, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Army policy states that although an honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004551
The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions or honorable and his reentry code changed. Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 8 March 2004 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial, AR 635-200 Chapter 10, KFS, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: HHD, 2030th PSB, Fort Wainwright, AK f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 23 May 2002, 3 years g. Current...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004552
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 2 September 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (serious offense) for his conviction by Special Court-Martial on 5 March 2009 at Camp Victory, Iraq. On 22 September 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004564
On 16 June 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004568
The evidence contained in the applicants service record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense, for being arrested by the county sheriffs office for violating a protective order on 26 August 2011, 27 August 2011, and 27 September 2011, which resulted in a felony conviction. On 6 June 2012, the applicant consulted with...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004610
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable and the narrative reason for discharge changed. On 21 July 2009, intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended that the separation action pertaining to the applicant under the provision of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200 for several incidents of misconduct be approved and that the applicant receive a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004617
The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004625
The record indicates he served two honorable periods in the Regular Army. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. However, in review of the applicants entire service record and the reasons for the discharge, it appears these accomplishments did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004627
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 3 April 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (serious offense) for testing positive for the wrongful use of cocaine. On 21 April 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004632
Prior Board Review: Yes SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 February 2002, for a period of 3 years. The record indicates that on 19 March 2012, an administrative separation board convened and based on an offense of attempting to bribe a Soldier not to process a leave form, recommended the applicants discharge with characterization of service of honorable and that it be suspended for six months. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD)...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004642
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 31 January 2001 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Misconduct , AR 635-200, Chapter 14 paragraph14-12b, JKA, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: 101st Military Police Company, Fort Campbell, KY f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 24 September 1997, 5 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 3 year, 4 months, 7 days h. Total Service: 3 year, 4 months, 7 days i. The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates on...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004673
Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of a change to the narrative reason of the applicants discharge to Secretarial Authority, under the provisions of Chapter 5-3, AR 635-200, with a corresponding SPD Code of JFF, and a reentry code (RE) of 1. Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. On 12 March 2004, the separation authority approved the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004698
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 27 October 2008 for 8 years. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. However, after examining the applicants record of service, her available military records, the documents and the issues submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004713
On 7 September 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 13 September 2011, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions; under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, for misconduct (serious offense), with a Separation Program Designator code (SPD) of JKQ and a RE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004714
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates on 30 August 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct for the following offense of receiving four Articles 15 since May 2003. Based on the above misconduct, the unit commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge and advised the applicant of his rights. The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004722
The applicant requests an upgrade of her general, under honorable conditions discharge to honorable and a change to the narrative reason for discharge. On 5 March 2002, the separation authority directed the applicants discharge with a general under honorable conditions characterization of service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was separated under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3b, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual admission, with a general under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004728
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 24 July 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130004728 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the characterization of service was too harsh based on the overall length and quality of the applicant's post...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004732
The applicant was released from active duty under the provision of Chapter 11, Army Regulation 635-200 and the Board noted the applicant had completed 6 months and 4 days of continued active service at the time the separation action was initiated; thus he was no longer in an entry level status. Six negative counseling statements dated between 23 March 2011 and 14 June 2011, concerning his entry level separation, recommendation for separation, and his entry level separation processing. The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004759
The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, for the commission of serious offenses. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. However, in review of the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004764
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 21 August 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130004764 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the characterization of service was too harsh based on the overall length and quality of the applicant's service,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004767
Her commander recommended that she receive an honorable discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, the record indicates she had several incidents of misconduct in that she received a Letter of Reprimand, a Field Grade Article 15, two Company Grade Article 15s, and numerous counseling statements.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004768
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 29 January 2009 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Misconduct (Serious Offense), AR 635-200, 14-12c JKQ, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: A Co, 2d Battalion, 503d IN Regiment, Vicenza, Italy f. Enlistment Date/Term: 8 March 2006, 5 years and 19 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 2 years, 9 months, 27 days h. Total Service: 2 years, 9 months, 27 days i. The record shows that on 12 January 2009, the unit commander notified...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004769
EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD: 1. The DD Form 214 also indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-drug abuse, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, there is insufficient evidence available in the official record to make a determination as to whether the applicants misconduct was an isolated incident or if he committed more than one offense...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004770
DISCHARGE UNDER REVIEW INFORMATION: Application Receipt Date: 7 March 2013 Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions Date of Discharge: 11 March 2005 Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Misconduct, AR 635-200, 14-12c(2), JKK, RE-4 Unit of assignment: D Btry, 3rd Bn, 4th ADA Reg, Fort Bragg, NC Current Enlistment Date/Term: 28 August 2002/ 4 years Current Enlistment Service: 2 years, 6 months, 14 days Total Service: 2 years, 6 months, 14 days Time Lost: None Previous Discharges:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004772
The evidence shows that on 14 May 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, for commission of a serious offense, abuse of illegal drugs, specifically for: a. receiving a Summary Court-Martial for testing positive for cocaine (090109). On 28 May 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004773
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 26 November 2008 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Misconduct (Civil Conviction), AR 635-200, Chapter 14, paragraph 14-5, JKB, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: 233rd Transportation Company, Fort Knox, KY f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 3 October 2006, 3 years and 19 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 1 year, 5 months, 24 days h. Total Service: 1 year, 5 months, 24 days i. On 12 November 2008, the separation authority...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004774
The evidence shows that on 16 December 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, for misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs, specifically for twice testing positive for marijuana (080908 and 081007). On 23 January 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004777
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 June 1998, for a period of 3 years. The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 24 September 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct. On 4 October 1999, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004781
On 25 February 2011, the service record indicates that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, for misconduct-commission of a serious offense, specifically for wrongfully using marijuana (101024-101124). Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004783
On 4 October 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 12 October 2012, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, for misconduct (drug abuse), a Separation Program Designator code (SPD) of JKK and an RE code of 4. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004788
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 11 July 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason pattern of misconduct. Based on the above misconduct, the unit commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge and advised the applicant of her rights. On 4 September 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004796
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 September 2006, for a period of 5 years. On 5 June 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Although the applicant alleges he experienced prejudice and during his military service, there is no evidence in his military records and the applicant has...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004823
The applicant requests an upgrade of his general, under honorable conditions discharge to honorable. The applicants record shows that on 13 May 2012, the separation authority approved and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 also indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, for unsatisfactory performance, with a characterization of service of general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004832
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. The evidence shows that on 16 April 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, for the commission of serious offenses; specifically, for receiving 3 Field Grade Articles 15 and a vacation of a suspended sentence for...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004833
On 22 March 2002, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. However, after examining the applicants record of service, his military records, the document and the issues submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Therefore and as approved by the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004834
On 30 November 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. A field grade Article 15, dated 8 October 2005 for 6 specification of failure to report to his place of duty and providing a false statement. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004836
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 September 2007, for a period of 3 years and 18 weeks. On 12 November 2009, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of UOTHC. EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD: The applicant's record does not contain any recorded actions under the UCMJ or counseling statements.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004891
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 3 November 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason misconduct (serious offense). On 23 November 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, the evidence of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004932
Two negative counseling statements dated between 13 March 2009 and 20 March 2009, concerning recommendations for separation from the Army under the provision of Chapter 11, entry level separation. It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. The Regulation also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004937
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 19 December 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct, specifically for DUI and driving with suspended driving...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004949
The applicant requests to upgrade his characterization of service from under other than honorable to general, under honorable conditions. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 February 2004, for a period of 4 years. On 12 February 2007, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004965
Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally appropriate for Soldiers who are separated from active duty with more than 30 days of AWOL. In the applicant's case, the separation authority allowed a general, under honorable conditions discharge after reviewing the applicant's...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004984
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. On 23 December 2009, the separation authority, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant contends she was diagnosed with PTSD while serving on active duty; however, the service record contains no evidence of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004987
On 3 December 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The record of evidence also contains a negative counseling statement, dated 22 July 2012 for DUI. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005013
The applicant requests an upgrade of his uncharacterized discharge to honorable and a change to the narrative reason for the discharge. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005017
The applicant states he served in the Army and Army National Guard and was discharged honorably. Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 1 August 2008 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Misconduct (Abuse of Illegal Drugs), NGR 600-200, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: HHC, 1st Bn, 178th Inf, Illinois Army National Guard, Chicago, IL f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 15 September 2003, NIF g. Current Enlistment Service: 4 years, 10 months, 17 days h. Total...