ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005028
The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions or honorable. The DD Form 214 under review indicates 61 days of time lost; (120822-120829, 120831-121017, and 121018-121024). The applicants statements alone does not overcome the governments presumption of regularity and no additional corroborating and supporting documentation or further evidence has been provided with the request for an upgrade of the discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005037
On 4 November 2007, the separation authority approved the conditional waiver request, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a self-authored statement, a copy of his DD Form 214 under review, a copy of a progress note, dated 13 September 2010 which shows the applicant had been diagnosed (100820) with PTSD and ADHD. Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005040
Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 10 April 2002 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial/AR-635-200 Chapter 10/KFS/RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: D Co, 1-507th Parachute Infantry Regiment Fort Benning, GA f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 16 March 2001, 4 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 10 months, 2 days h. Total Service: 10 months, 2 days i. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005054
The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 17 January 2002 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial, AR 635-200, Chapter 10, KFS, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: HHC, 1-16 IN BN, Fort Riley, KS f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 24 June 1998, 4 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 3 years, 4 months, 22 days h. Total Service: 3 years, 4...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005056
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the United States Army Reserve on 8 August 1993, for a period of 8 years. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Personality Disorder, and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005095
The board recommended the applicants discharge with characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. On 23 January 2013, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 29 January 2013, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005097
On 18 October 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 9 November 2004, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, for misconduct, a Separation Program Designator code (SPD) of JKK and an RE code of 4. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005098
The DD Form 214 indicates that on 30 June 2011, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, for pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldiers separation specifically allows such characterization. The DD Form 214 also indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005099
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 April 2008 for a period of 4 years and 26 weeks. On 10 February 2012, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the applicant produced any evidence, to support a change to the characterization of service granted.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005102
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 1 December 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense. On 7 December 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army policy...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005104
3 On 4 June 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, for being an alcohol and drug rehabilitation failure. On 5 July 2012, the separation authority approved the proposed action and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army policy states that an honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge is authorized depending on...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005124
The applicant requests an upgrade of his uncharacterized discharge to general, under honorable conditions. It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. The Regulation also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005126
The recommendation memorandum indicates that separation action was recommended under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for engaging in a pattern of misconduct between (100810 and 120104). On 28 August 2012, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005130
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable. The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates on 15 September 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct. On 27September 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005131
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 26 July 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (serious offense). On 9 August 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Six negative counseling...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005132
Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 also indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Although the applicant alleges he was a victim of harassment and racism during his military service, there is no evidence in...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005136
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 6 June 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct. On 12 July 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005138
The applicant served almost three years which included two combat tours (Iraq and Afghanistan). On 15 November 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. After a careful review of the applicants military records for the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents submitted with the application, it appears that the discharge is now inequitable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005141
THE APPLICANTS REQUEST AND STATEMENT: Issues: The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from under other than honorable conditions to general, under honorable conditions or honorable and a change to the narrative reason for separation. 12 June 2007, the separation authority directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of honorable. On 16 November 2007, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005144
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 20 May 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs. On 27 May 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, after examining...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005146
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable. On 22 June 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005161
On 27 March 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of his intent to process him for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, by reason of pattern of misconduct; specifically for: a. failing to follow a direct order twice from SSG K to have his uniform to the standards set forth in policy letter #2 (110918 and 110919). On 5 April 2012, the separation authority, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005163
On 14 August 2012, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Board of Review and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. A general under honorable conditions characterization of service will normally be issued to an officer when the officers military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A separation under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005169
Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 28 November 2006 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Unsatisfactory Participant, AR 135-178, Chapter 13, RE NIF, SPD NA e. Unit of assignment: HHD, 468th QM Bn, 10031 E. Northwest Hwy, Dallas, TX 75238, (TPU) 90th RSC f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 23 July 2002, 6 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 4 years, 4 months, 5 days h. Total Service: 12 years, 3 months, 5 days i. The record contains a properly...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005216
The record shows that on 13 December 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, for misconduct, specifically for being convicted in civilian court of check forgery. The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005222
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 9 October 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130005222 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The applicant requests his under other than...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005224
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 August 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130005224 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. On 14 May 2003, the applicant was discharged...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005225
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 September 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130005225 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The available evidence shows the applicants...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005228
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates on 23 October 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs for testing positive for illegal drugs (060530). The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005229
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. On 28 January 2013, the separation authority, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions for a pattern of misconduct.. 5. The evidence of record shows the command attempted to assist the applicant in performing and conducting...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005232
The evidence of record shows that on 15 June 2011, the unit commander attempted to notify the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve, for not attending a scheduled Battle Assembly (BA) on 11 June 2010 and failed to provide a valid reason for her absence. On 9 September 2011, the separation authority having reviewed the evidence, determined the applicant was an unsatisfactory...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005240
On 5 July 2012, the separation authority approved the conditional waiver request, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of honorable. EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD: There are no counseling statements or any disciplinary actions available in the applicants record; however, the unit commanders forwarding memorandum states, in effect, in describing rehabilitation attempts, the Soldier was given 21 instances of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005246
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 10 January 2012 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Misconduct (Serious Offense), AR 635-200, 14-12c JKQ, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: B Company, 4th Battalion, 23d Infantry Regiment Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA f. Enlistment Date/Term: 1 October 2010, 4 years and 18 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 1 year, 3 months, 10 days h. Total Service: 1 year, 3 months, 10 days i. On 13 December 2011, the separation authority...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005252
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 11 September 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130005252 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The applicant requests his under other...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005259
On 16 March 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 6 April 2011, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, for misconduct (serious offense), a Separation Program Designator code (SPD) of JKQ and an RE code of 3. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005262
Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 10 March 2008 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Misconduct (Drug Abuse), AR 635-200, Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), JKK, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: 11th Quartermaster Company, 82nd Brigade Troops Battalion, Fort Bragg, NC f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 8 August 2006, 4 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 1 year, 6 months h. Total Service: 1 year, 6 months i. On 28 February 2008, the separation authority waived...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005267
The applicant requests an upgrade of her discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable and a change to the narrative reason for separation to include the reentry eligibility (RE) code. The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates on 25 August 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct. The applicant contends...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005269
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 18 September 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130005269 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and notwithstanding the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the applicants length and quality of his...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005301
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates on 12 June 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct. Based on the above misconduct, the unit commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge and advised the applicant of his rights. On 27 June 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005314
IN THE CASE OF: Ms. BOARD DATE: 23 August 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130005314 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The available evidence in the record...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005316
The applicant was separated from the Army on 30 August 2012, with an uncharacterized discharge. The Regulation also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status. In addition, the evidence of record shows the command attempted to assist the applicant in performing and conducting himself to Army standards by providing counseling and by the imposition of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005321
On 20 November 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant's disciplinary record includes a summary court-martial, dated 28 September 2009, for being AWOL (090813-090912). However, after examining the applicants record of service, his military records, the documents and the issues submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005369
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 7 December 2007 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Misconduct (Drug Abuse), AR 635-200, Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), JKK, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: E Co, 1-506th Infantry Regiment, 4th Brigade Combat Team, Fort Campbell, KY f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 30 November 2006, period of service NIF/see DD Form 215 g. Current Enlistment Service: 1 year, 8 days h. Total Service: 3 years, 4 months, 5 days i. On 2...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005383
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the ARNG on 30 September 2003 for a period of 8 years. On 15 December 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The separation authority approved the discharge under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, for a pattern of misconduct.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005384
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Army Reserves on 8 April 2006 for a period of 8 years. On 8 July 2011, the separation authority, approved the applicants discharge IAW AR 135-178, chapter 12-1d, Abuse of Illegal Drugs, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005385
EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a DD Form 293, a letter from the Office of Veterans Service, dated 12 March 2013, a copy of a letter from the Veterans Affairs, dated 2 March 2012, and copy of her DD Form 214 for the period of service under review. Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005386
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. On 19 November 2008, the separation authority directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. A State Department of Driver Service, dated 27 September 2008, indicates the applicant was arrested by civil authorities.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005387
She completed 2 years, 5 months, and 6 days of active duty service. On 18 September 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The return date of 3 October 2008 is the same date the applicant was discharged from the Army.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005391
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 September 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130005391 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. However, the record shows the separation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005392
Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 21 March 2007 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial/AR-635-200/ Chapter 10/KFS/RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: A Battery, 3-6th ADA, Fort Bliss TX f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 18 September 2006, 6 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 4 months, 20 days h. Total Service: 4 months, 20 days i. On 1 March 2007, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the...