ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012307
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 7 March 2011 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Misconduct (Drug Abuse), AR 635-200, 14-12c(2) JKK, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: A Co, 725th Bde Support Battalion, Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, AK f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 29 May 2008, 3 years and 18 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 2 years, 9 months, 9 days h. Total Service: 2 years, 9 months, 9 days i. The service record indicates that on 13 January 2011,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012308
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 July 2010, for a period of 4 years. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldiers separation specifically allows such characterization. The applicants statements alone do not overcome the presumption of government regularity and the application contains no documentation or further evidence in support of this request for an upgrade of the discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012315
Discharge received: Uncharacterized c. Date of Discharge: 11 April 2002 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Entry Level Performance and Conduct, Chapter 11 AR 635-200, JGA, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: Co A, 2d Bn, 46th IN Regiment, Fort Knox, KY f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 31 October 2001, 3 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 0 years, 4 months, 11 days h. Total Service: 0 years, 4 months, 11 days i. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012316
The applicant requests that his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable or general, under honorable conditions. The board recommended the applicant be discharge from the service with an under other than honorable discharge. On 20 December 2011, the separation authority approved the findings and recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012319
She did not want to be discharged. On 25 July 2007, the separation authority, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. As the applicant did not subsequently conform to required standards of discipline and performance, the command appropriately determined the applicant did not demonstrate the potential for further military service.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012322
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 25 April 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130012322 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012325
On 8 May 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants release from active duty with an uncharacterized discharge. It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. However, a careful review of the entire record reveals that this medical condition did not overcome the reason for discharge and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012335
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 26 March 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130012335 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The applicant requests an upgrade of his...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012340
The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. The applicant was separated with an uncharacterized discharge. Soldiers being processed for separation are assigned reentry codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012351
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 17 June 2009 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Pattern of Misconduct, AR 635-200, Chapter 14-12b, JKA, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: United States Army Dental Activity, Fort Stewart, GA f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 25 August 2007, 6 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 1 year, 9 months, 22 days h. Total Service: 3 years, 4 months, 3 days i. On 18 May 2009, the separation authority, waived further rehabilitation and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012363
On 28 September 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14-12c (2), by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs; specifically for: a. receiving a Field Grade Article 15 for violating Article 112a by wrongfully using a controlled substance (111206). The separation authority waived further rehabilitation efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012367
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 17 February 2011 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Pattern of Misconduct, AR 635-200, Chapter 14-12b JKA, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: Medical Company, United States Army Medical Department Activity, Fort Campbell, KY f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 6...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012370
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 23 April 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130012370 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and notwithstanding the Analysts Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the applicants length and quality of his...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012374
On 15 September 2011, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. On 28 September 2011 the applicant was discharged from the Army, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a DD Form 293, dated June 2013, a DD Form 214, and a self-authored statement.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012378
The applicant requests to upgrade the characterization of her service from general, under honorable conditions to fully honorable. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a self-authored statement, dated 3 July 2013; DD Form 214 for service under current review; four character reference statements, dated 6 November 2012 and 23 November 2013, respectively; Fort Bragg Policy, dated 26 March 2012, for mandatory initiation of administrative separation for drug and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012383
EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided with her application, her DD Form 214 for service under current review. It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. The regulation also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012387
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 9 April 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130012387 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Based on the above misconduct, the unit...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012395
The applicant requests to upgrade the characterization of his service from under other than honorable conditions to fully honorable. On 22 August 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of a general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012398
The applicant requests to upgrade his uncharacterized service to fully honorable and to change the narrative reason for his discharge. It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. The regulation also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012423
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 2 April 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130012423 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012432
The board recommended the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. On 14 February 2013, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The administrative separation board proceedings dated On 22 January 2013.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012443
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 9 April 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130012443 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and notwithstanding the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the circumstances surrounding the discharge as the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012467
The evidence of record shows that on 29 February 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, for missing at least 9 training assemblies (111105-120205) within a one year period and failing to provide a valid excuse for her absences, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The record contains documentation that shows the unit contacted the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012479
The applicant requests an upgrade of her uncharacterized discharge to honorable and a change in the reason for her separation. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided no supporting documentation with her application. However, the record indicates the separation authority approved the discharge as an entry level status separation with her service described as uncharacterized.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012495
The record shows that on 19 October 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (serious offense), specifically for: a. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations in effect at the time for a discharge under this paragraph is "misconduct, serious offense and the separation code is "JKQ." The records show the proper discharge and separation authority...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012499
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. He completed 5 years, 6 months, and 3 days of active duty service. On 17 March 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012512
On 10 June 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. The service record confirms the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012522
He had been in Iraq for a yearhe had no time to take it all in. On 28 February 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided DD Form 214 for service under current review and statement regarding educational counseling, dated 6 March 2006.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012562
He received a negative counseling statement, dated 22 April 2011 for being recommended for separation under Chapter 13. However, after examining the applicants record of service, his military records and the issues submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit a change to the narrative reason for separation. However, Soldiers being processed for separation are assigned reentry codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012639
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the examiners Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge to be both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 7 February 2001 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial, AR 635-200, Chapter 10, KFS, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012664
On 2 November 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 15 November 2007, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, for a pattern of misconduct, a Separation Program Designator code (SPD) of JKA and an RE code of 3. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012666
On 15 August 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. On 4 January 2007, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012670
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the United States Army Reserve on 31 January 2008, for a period of 8 years. The evidence of record shows that on 14 April 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, for missing at least 9 training assemblies within a one year period and failing to provide a valid excuse for his absences, with...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012676
The evidence contained in the applicants service record shows that on 22 July 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense, for wrongfully using cocaine, an illegal drug. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012757
Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 12 January 2005 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial, AR 635-200, Chapter 10, KFS, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: A Btry, 1st Bn, 41st FA Rgt, Fort Stewart, GA f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 30 July 2002, 3 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 2 years, 4 months, 2 days h. Total Service: 2 years, 4 months, 2 days i. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The record shows the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012765
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The record shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 April 2010, for a period of 3 years and 19 weeks. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, for misconduct (drug abuse), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012786
Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The evidence of record shows the applicant, while in training status, was diagnosed by competent medical authority with an adjustment disorder with depressed mood. However, Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012811
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 17 May 2013 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Condition, Not a Disability, AR 635-200, Paragraph 5-17, JFV, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: B Co, 309th MI Bn, 111th MI Bde, Fort Huachuca, AZ f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 30 July 2012, 3 years, 34 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 0 years, 9 months, 18 days h. Total Service: 0 years, 9 months, 18 days i. On 10 May 2013, the separation authority directed the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012891
On 8 May 2013, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions and did not submit a statement on his behalf. However, after examining the applicants record of service, his military records, and the documents and issues submitted with the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012900
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. The evidence shows that on 19 November 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, for commission of a serious offense, abuse of illegal drugs, specifically for wrongfully using marijuana (120430-120530). Army policy...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012903
Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. The applicable Army regulation states there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization. However, Soldiers being processed for separation are assigned reentry codes based on their service records or the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012908
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that in an undated memorandum, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct (serious offense), specifically for: a. failing to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty on several occasions (091128, 100626, 100629, and 100927); b. disrespecting an NCO on several occasions (100123,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012911
On 1 May 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. The record confirms the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012913
Two negative counseling statements, dated 12 March 2012 and 13 March 2012, for driving under the influence of alcohol and being recommended for involuntary separation. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided with her self-authored statement, DD Form 214 for service under current review; certificate showing she completed an intensive outpatient program on 27 August 2012; a college official acceptance notification, dated 20 March 2013; and course schedule, dated 9 July...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012932
She was discharged as a SPC/E-4. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. However, Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130013036
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 25 April 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130013036 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and notwithstanding the examiners Discussion and Recommendation that follows, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the applicants length and quality of his...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130013070
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 22 December 2003 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial, AR 635-200, Chapter 10, KFS, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: A Co, 1st Bn, 81st AR Regiment, Fort Knox, KY f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 27 August 2001, 4 years g....
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130013078
Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 1 February 2010 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial/AR-635-200 Chapter 10/KFS/RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: C Co, 551st Signal Battalion, Fort Gordon, GA f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 17 June 2008, 3 years and 27 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 11 months, 7 days h. Total Service: 11 months, 7 days i. On 10 January 2010, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130013082
The applicant requests to upgrade the characterization of his service from under other than honorable to fully honorable. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 October 2008, and reenlisted on 4 November 2010, for a period of 6 years. On 12 December 2012, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130013086
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 16 April 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130013086 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The separation authority waived further...