ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011175
Based on the above misconduct, the unit commander recommended an honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge and advised the applicant of his rights. On 16 April 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The Army Discharge Review Board is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011179
On 27 March 2013, the separation authority directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. An RE Code of 3 indicates the applicant requires a waiver prior to being allowed to reenlist.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011205
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. On 9 November 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011350
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 31 January 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130011350 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The characterization of service for...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011381
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 18 October 2006, for a period of 3 years and 19 weeks. On 17 April 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011446
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 7 April 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130011446 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony, and notwithstanding the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the applicants length and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011546
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the applicants characterization of service was proper and equitable and voted not to change it. The record indicates the applicant was separated from the Army for homosexual admission, with an uncharacterized discharge. AR 635-200, paragraph 3-9 also provides that a separation will be described as...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011555
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 3 February 2003 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Misconduct, AR 635-200, Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), JKK, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: 984th Military Police Company, 759th Military Police Battalion, Fort Carson, CO f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 21 March 2001, 5 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 1 year, 10 months, 13 days h. Total Service: 1 year, 10 months, 13 days i. The evidence contained in the applicants...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011568
Discharge Received: Uncharacterized c. Date of Discharge: 5 May 2008 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial, Chapter 10 KFS, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: A Co, 2d Bn, 13 IN Rgt, Fort Jackson, SC f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 9 June 2006/ADT, 19 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 6 months, 10 days h. Total Service: 9 months, 28 days i. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard on 21 February 2006, for a period...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011572
The applicant states, in effect, he would like to reenlist in the military. Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 1 June 2010 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure, AR 635-200, Chapter 9, JPD, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: Bravo Battery, 4th Battalion, 1st Field Artillery, Fort Bliss, TX f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 20 January 2009/3 years, 18 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 1 year, 4 months, 12 days h. Total Service:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011574
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable and a change to the narrative reason. The record shows that on 16 November 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, for misconduct (serious offense), specifically for the following offenses: a. On 21 November 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011780
Based on the above pattern of misconduct, the commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 13 December 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a DD Form 293, dated 21 June 2013, a DD Form 214, and a undated document showing he received a fifty percent rating based on a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011812
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 4 April 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130011812 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing her testimony and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge to be proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Prior Board Review:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011815
The applicant requests an upgrade of his uncharacterized discharge to honorable and a change to the narrative reason for separation to include the reentry eligibility (RE) code. EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD The record contains a counseling statement, dated 8 April 2013, recommending separation action under Chapter 11, AR 635-200. It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011823
Based on the above pattern of misconduct, the commander recommended an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 9 September 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of, under other than honorable conditions. The applicant was separated on 17 September 2011, under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14-12c(1), for misconduct (AWOL), with an, under other than honorable conditions discharge,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011855
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Army Reserve on 4 December 2000 for a period of 8 years. The available evidence in the record indicates that on 26 August 2008, DA HQs, Army Reserve Medical Command, Pinellas Park, Florida, Orders Number 08-239-00012, discharged the applicant from the Army Reserve, effective 2 September 2008, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The record contains a properly constituted order which indicates the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011883
The applicant requests to change the narrative reason for separation from misconduct (drug abuse) to reflect, at a minimum, misconduct only. The evidence shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, for misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs, specifically for testing positive for the drug THC on 23 April 2010. On 1 July 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011896
Overseas Service: None p. Combat Service: None q. Decorations/Awards: AAM-3, NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR r. Administrative Separation Board: No s. Performance Ratings: No t. Counseling Statements: Yes u. On 22 January 2013, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, after examining the applicants record of service, his military records, the document and the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011904
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 May 2011, for a period of 3 years and 23 weeks. On 18 July 2012, the separation authority, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was separated on 3 August 2012, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, for a pattern of misconduct, with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011911
The evidence shows that on 27 October 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, for commission of a serious offense, specifically for participating in the consumption and/or usage of cocaine. On 19 November 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011912
Based on the above misconduct, the unit commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge and advised the applicant of his rights. On 19 July 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicable Army regulation states there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by an isolated incident provides the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011924
On 15 March 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14-12b, pattern of misconduct. Based on the above pattern of misconduct, the commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge. CSM J, stated in effect, he recommended the applicant receive an honorable discharge instead of a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011929
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldiers separation specifically allows such characterization. The DD Form 214 shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, for misconduct (drug abuse), with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011951
Based on the above pattern of misconduct, the commander recommended an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 9 September 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The applicant was separated on 17 September 2011, under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14-12c(1), for misconduct (AWOL), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge, an...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011964
Prior Board Review: None SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The record shows the applicant enlisted in the US Army Reserve on 26 February 2001, for a period of 8 years. On 25 February 2005, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Soldiers being processed for separation are assigned reentry codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011970
Discharge received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 19 December 2011 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Misconduct (Serious Offense), AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, JKQ, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: B Co, 88th BSB, Fort Polk, LA f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 19 November 2010, 4 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 1 year, 1 month, 1 day h. Total Service: 3 years, 8 months, 1 day i. The DD Form 214 indicates that on 19 December 2011, the applicant was discharged under the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011971
On 18 March 2010, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. After examining the applicants record of service, his military records, the documents and the issues submitted with the application, there are several mitigating factors to merit a partial upgrade of the applicant's discharge to general, under honorable conditions for the following reasons: a. The service record...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011994
On 23 April 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14-12b, a pattern of misconduct. On 23 April 1999, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf; waived his right to an administrative separation board and requested to be separated with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 19 May 1999, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011999
IN THE CASE OF: Ms. BOARD DATE: 19 March 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130011999 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. On 28 February 2013, the separation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012024
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 2 April 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130012024 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on service of sufficient length, the applicant was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012069
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 9 May 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130012069 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the examiners Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. He was discharged as a SPC/E-4. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012076
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable. The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates on 14 January 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (serious offense) for absenting himself from his unit from (080727-080912), beginning date of AWOL period should be 27 June 2007. On 6...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012080
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 21 February 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130012080 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the Discussion and Recommendation that follows, the Board noted that the government introduced a document into the discharge process that is limited use evidence. On 15 May 2013, the separation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012157
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 2 April 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130012157 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the characterization of service was improper because the applicant was not in an entry level status. The reasons...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012160
The evidence shows that on 21 September 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, for misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs, specifically for: a. Wrongfully using marijuana (110515-110616) b. On 26 September 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012174
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 27 January 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130012174 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge to be both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. However, in review of the applicants...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012183
On 27 November 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. However, after examining the applicants record of service, his military records, the documents and the issues submitted with the application, there are insufficient...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012202
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 27 August 2008 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Misconduct (Serious Offense), AR 635-200, Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, JKQ, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: 82nd Financial Management Company, 82nd Special Troops Battalion, Fort Bragg, NC f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 13 July 2006, 6 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 1 year, 9 months 14 days h. Total Service: 7 years, 11 days/block 12c on the applicants DD Form 214...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012213
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the US Army Reserve on 7 November 2007, attended initial active duty training and received an honorable characterization for his IADT service. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012220
The applicant was separated on 8 June 2009, under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14-12c, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge, an SPD code of JKQ, and an RE code of 3. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldiers separation specifically allows such characterization. The Army Discharge Review Board is authorized to consider post-service factors in the re-characterization of a discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012232
The board recommended the applicants discharge with characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. On 2 December 2011, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicants service record contains documentation that supports a diagnosis of several in-service medical conditions; however, a careful review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012234
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates on 23 November 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for being absent without leave (AWOL) for an extended period of time. The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012243
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates on 5 March 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-drug abuse for wrongfully using cocaine. On 11 March 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012250
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 27June 2006 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Misconduct (Drug Abuse), AR 635-200, Chapter 14 paragraph 14-12c(2), JKK, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: 71st Chemical Company, 8th Special Troops Battalion, Schofield Barracks, HI f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 1 April 2004, 6 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 2 years, 2 months, 27 days h. Total Service: 2 years, 2 months, 27 days i. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012256
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. On 20 October 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, the service record does not support the applicants contention, and no evidence to support it has been submitted to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012260
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. On 23 August 2011, the separation authority, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, for a pattern of misconduct. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012281
On 30 August 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, after examining the applicants record of service, his military records, and the document and issues submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The records show the proper discharge and separation authority...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012282
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the overall quality of the applicants service and his combat service, and as a result it is inequitable. On 23 April 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012284
The DD Form 214 indicates that on 9 May 2012, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, for misconduct (drug abuse), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 also indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012293
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. On 7 April 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14-12c(2), for misconduct, abuse of illegal drugs Specifically, for wrongfully using MDMA (Ecstasy) on or between 1 January 2010 and 4 January 2010. The applicant contends that he had good...