Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011546
Original file (AR20130011546.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
      IN THE CASE OF:  	Ms. 

      BOARD DATE:  	15 January 2014

      CASE NUMBER:  	AR20130011546
___________________________________________________________________________

Board Determination and Directed Action

1.  After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the applicant’s characterization of service was proper and equitable and voted not to change it.  However, the Board found the narrative reason for the applicant’s discharge is now inequitable based on the current standard.  

2.  The record indicates the applicant was separated from the Army for homosexual admission, with an uncharacterized discharge.  The record does not contain any aggravating factors as defined in AR 635-200.  

3.  Accordingly, the Board voted to grant partial relief in the form of a change to the narrative reason of the applicant’s discharge to “Secretarial Authority,” under the provisions of Chapter 5-3, AR 635-200, with a corresponding SPD Code of “JFF,” and a reentry code (RE) of “1.”



      
      
      Presiding Officer
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case.

THE APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND STATEMENT:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of her discharge from uncharacterized to honorable, a change to the reentry (RE) code and to the narrative reason for the discharge.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that her request is based on the repeal of the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy that was in effect at the time of her discharge.

DISCHARGE UNDER REVIEW INFORMATION:

a. Application Receipt Date:		17 June 2013
b. Discharge received:			Uncharacterized
c. Date of Discharge:			25 April 2008
d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE:		Homosexual Admission, AR 635-200, Chapter 15-3b 						JRB, RE-4
e. Unit of assignment:			D Co, 2nd Bn, 10th IN, Fort Leonard Wood, MO
f. Current Enlistment Date/Term:  	20 February 2008/ADT, NIF
g. Current Enlistment Service:  	2 months, 6 days
h. Total Service:			3 months
i. Time lost:				None
j. Previous Discharges:		ARNG-080126-080219/NA										     (Concurrent Service)
k. Highest Grade Achieved:		E-1
l. Military Occupational Specialty:	None
m. GT Score:				NIF
n. Education:				HS Graduate
o. Overseas Service:			None
p. Combat Service:			None
q. Decorations/Awards:		None
r. Administrative Separation Board: 	No
s. Performance Ratings:		None
t. Counseling Statements:		None
u. Prior Board Review:			No
SUMMARY OF SERVICE:

The applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard on 26 January 2008, for a period of 8 years.  She was 19 years old at the time of entry and a high school graduate.  On 20 February 2008, she entered active duty for training (ADT).  When her discharge proceedings were initiated she was attending training at Fort Leonard Wood, MO.  The record does not contain any evidence of acts of valor or meritorious achievements.

SEPARATION FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES:

1.  The applicant’s record does not contain the discharge packet that normally provides the facts and circumstances related to the discharge.  However, the record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant’s signature.  

2.  The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3b, AR 635-200, for homosexual conduct (admission), with an uncharacterized separation of service.  The DD Form 214 shows a Separation Program Designator (SPD) of JRB and a reentry (RE) code of 4.  

3.  The service record does not contain any evidence of unauthorized absences or time lost.  

EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD:

There are no counseling statements or UCMJ actions in the available record.

EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT:

The applicant provided an online application.

POST-SERVICE ACTIVITY: 

None were provided with the application.

REGULATORY AUTHORITY:

1.  Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 15 stated that active homosexuality was incompatible with military service and provided, in pertinent part, for the separation of members who actively engaged in homosexual conduct or who, by their statements, demonstrated a tendency to engage in homosexual conduct.  

2.  The Regulation stated that when the sole basis for separation was homosexuality, a discharge under other than honorable conditions may be issued only if such characterization was warranted in accordance with Chapter 3, Section III, and if there was a finding that during the current term of service the Soldier attempted, solicited, or committed a homosexual act by using force, coercion or intimidation; with a person under 16 years of age; with a subordinate in circumstances that violate customary military superior subordinate relationships; openly in public view; for compensation; aboard a military vessel or aircraft; or in another location subject to military control if the conduct had, or was likely to have had, an adverse impact on discipline, good order, or morale due to the close proximity of other Soldiers of the Armed Forces.  

3.  In all other cases where no aggravating factors were present, the type of discharge would reflect the character of the Soldier’s overall record of service. 

4.  AR 635-200, paragraph 3-9 also provides that a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service.

DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The applicant’s request for an upgrade of the characterization of her discharge and a change to the narrative reason for separation was carefully considered.  However, after examining the applicant’s available record of service, his military records, the issue and documents submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  

2.  The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to her discharge from the Army.  However, the record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and government regularity is presumed in the discharge process.  

3.  The DD Form 214 also indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3b, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual conduct (admission), with a characterization of service of uncharacterized. 

4.  A Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.  The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary period.  Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when his separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status.  
      
5.  A general, under honorable conditions discharge is not authorized under ELS conditions and an honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty.  The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant’s record and the former Soldier’s service did not warrant an honorable discharge.  

6.  Furthermore, current law and regulations now allow Soldiers who are homosexual to serve openly.  Former Soldiers that were discharged under the old policy may request a change to the reason for their separation invoking the current standard.  The Board considers any aggravating factors and in their absence, will change the narrative reason for the discharge to Secretarial Authority.  The applicant’s available record does not indicate the presence of any aggravating factors.  

7.  In view of the foregoing, it appears the narrative reason for the applicant’s discharge is now inequitable based on the current standard.  Therefore, recommend the Board grant partial relief in the form of a change to the narrative reason for separation to “Secretarial Authority,” under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-3, AR 635-200, with a corresponding SPD Code of “JFF,” and a reentry code (RE) of “1.”  The characterization of service was found to be proper and equitable.

SUMMARY OF ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING:

Type of Hearing:  Records Review     Date:  15 January 2014     Location:  Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  NA 

Counsel:  None

Witnesses/Observers:  NA 

Board Vote:
Character Change:  NA	No Change:  NA
Reason Change:	5	No Change:  0
(Board member names available upon request)

Board Action Directed:
Issue a new DD Form 214:		Yes
Change Characterization to:	NA
Change Reason to:			Secretarial Authority
Change Authority for Separation:	AR 635-200, Chapter 5-3
Change RE Code to:		1
Grade Restoration to:		NA
Other:					Separation Program Designator (SPD) code to ‘JFF.’
















Legend:
AMHRR - Army Military Human Resource Record	FG - Field Grade	IADT – Initial Active Duty Training	 	RE - Reentry
AWOL - Absent Without Leave	GD - General Discharge	NA - Not applicable	SCM- Summary Court Martial
BCD - Bad Conduct Discharge	HS - High School	NIF - Not in File	SPCM - Special Court Martial
CG - Company Grade Article 15	HD - Honorable Discharge	OAD - Ordered to Active Duty	UNC - Uncharacterized Discharge  
CID - Criminal investigation Department	MP – Military Police	OMPF - Official Military Personnel File	UOTHC - Under Other Than                           			               Honorable Conditions


ADRB Case Report and Directive (cont)		AR20130011546



Page 3 of 5 pages


ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (ADRB)

CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE



1


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130016363

    Original file (AR20130016363.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the applicant’s characterization of service was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it. The record indicates the applicant was separated from the Army for homosexual admission, with an uncharacterized discharge. The service record indicates that on 16 June 2003, the unit commander...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004673

    Original file (AR20130004673.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of a change to the narrative reason of the applicant’s discharge to “Secretarial Authority,” under the provisions of Chapter 5-3, AR 635-200, with a corresponding SPD Code of “JFF,” and a reentry code (RE) of “1.” Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. On 12 March 2004, the separation authority approved the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130010329

    Original file (AR20130010329.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the applicant’s characterization of service was proper and equitable and voted not to change it. The evidence of record shows the applicant while in entry level status, was discharged for admitting to being homosexual without any aggravating factors as defined in AR 635-200 in effect at the time. The...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110025156

    Original file (AR20110025156.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, through legal counsel that in light of the changes in military policy regarding homosexual speech and conduct that have occurred since the applicant's discharge, the Board should: change the applicant's narrative reason for discharge from Homosexual Conduct (Admission) to Secretarial Authority and change his reentry code from RE-4 to RE- 1J. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001027

    Original file (AR20130001027.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 10 May 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130001027 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the narrative reason for the applicant’s discharge is now inequitable based on the current standard. The evidence of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110020264

    Original file (AR20110020264.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 September 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3b, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual admission with an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110016714

    Original file (AR20110016714.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? A Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Army Regulation 635-200, also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when her separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016649

    Original file (AR20110016649.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 1 September 2004, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived her right to an administrative separation board, contingent upon her receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than an honorable discharge and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. The Board will consider any aggravating factors and in their absence, will change the narrative reason for the discharge to Secretarial Authority.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001383

    Original file (AR20130001383.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the applicant’s characterization of service was proper and equitable and voted not to change it. The record indicates the applicant was separated from the Army for homosexual admission, with an uncharacterized discharge. POST-SERVICE ACTIVITY: The applicant did not provide any with the application.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130006362

    Original file (AR20130006362.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the applicant’s characterization of service was proper and equitable and voted not to change it. The record indicates the applicant was separated from the Army for homosexual admission, with an uncharacterized discharge. AR 635-200, paragraph 3-9, also provides that a separation will be described as...