ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005436
On 17 July 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant consulted with legal counsel and requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and had over 6 years of total active and reserve military service at the time of initiation of separation action. Board Vote: Character Change: 5 No...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005440
Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(1) by reason of misconduct , with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason specified by...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005443
Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 27 May 2009 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial/AR-635-200 Chapter 10/KFS/RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: C Co, 447th Signal Battalion, 15th Signal Brigade Fort Gordon, GA f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 20 March 2008, 6 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 4 months, 19 days h. Total Service: 4 months, 19 days i. On 18 May 2009, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005446
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 3 August 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason misconduct (serious offense). However, after examining the applicants record of service, his military records, the documents and the issues submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005448
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the Discussion and Recommendation that follows, the Board determined that the characterization of service was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 15 April 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005449
The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to honorable. The applicant requested a general, under honorable conditions discharge. After examining the applicants record of service, his available military records, and the issues submitted with the application, there are several mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge to general, under honorable conditions for the following reasons: a.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005451
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 August 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130005451 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The reasons for separation, including the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005452
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates on 20 September 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs for wrongfully possessing spice. On 15 October 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005467
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates on 18 March 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for testing positive for illegal drugs (060530) and AWOL. On 31 March 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005476
On 9 January 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. In fact, the applicants two Article 15 actions and numerous negative counseling statements justify a pattern of misconduct.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005477
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 1 May 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130005477 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005478
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable and a change to his reentry eligibility (RE) code. The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 20 September 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (serious offense) for driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005486
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 May 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130005486 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The applicant requests an upgrade of his...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005487
He completed 5 years, 3 months, and 24 days of active duty service. The evidence contained in the applicants service record shows that on 21 November 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense for being AWOL 17 September 2005 through 10 February 2006. On 23 January 2007, the separation authority approved the recommendation of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005493
On 18 January 2000, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions and did not submit a statement on his behalf. On 7 February 2000, the separation authority approved the conditional waiver request, waived further rehabilitation and directed the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005502
It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as uncharacterized. However, Soldiers being processed for separation are assigned reentry codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005504
Specifically for the following offenses: a. falsifying an official document, to wit: DD Form 689 (Individual Sick Slip) b. going AWOL (110922-110927) 2. On 24 February 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 7 March 2012, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005554
The applicant requests to upgrade his characterization of service from general, under honorable conditions to fully honorable and a change to the narrative reason for his separation. The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 28 October 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason misconduct (serious offense), specifically for the following...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005569
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from under other than honorable conditions to honorable. On 22 November 1999, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions 4. The record of evidence does not show the applicants discharge was upgraded or he had submitted a prior application requesting an upgrade.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005582
The applicant requests his general, under honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 22 May 2012, the separation authority directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Further, when the discharge was initiated, the applicant was notified by the unit commander that he was recommending the applicant receive a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005583
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 22 September 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense. On 27 September 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005584
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 24 May 2012 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Misconduct (Serious Offense), AR 635-200, Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, JKQ, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: A Co, 3d Bn, 1st AHB, 1st CAB, Fort Riley, KS f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 19 March 2008, 6 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 4 years, 2 months, 6 days h. Total Service: 4 years, 2 months, 6 days i. Based on the above misconduct, the unit commander recommended a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005591
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 25 September 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130005591 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the narrative reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. POST-SERVICE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005593
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 2 October 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130005593 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Discharge Received: Bad Conduct Discharge c....
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005596
On 11 January 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005601
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 8 October 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason misconduct (serious offense). On 17 October 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicable Army regulation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005628
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 18 September 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct. The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005648
Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 23 March 1998 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Misconduct, 14-12c(2), JKK, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: C Btry, 2-320th FA, 101st Abn Div (AASLT), Fort Campbell, KY f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 21 December 1995, 4 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 2 years, 3 months, 2 days h. Total Service: 5 years, 10 months, 24 days i. On 17 March 1998, the separation authority directed the applicants discharge with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005650
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the Discussion and Recommendation that follows, the Board determined that the characterization of service was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. On 10 July 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army policy states that an under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005662
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Army Reserves and entered the Regular Army on 6 May 2004, and was released upon completion of required active duty service on 8 November 2008. EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD: Discharge orders, dated 17 November 2010. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005664
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 October 2010, for a period of 4 years and 23 weeks. On 16 November 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with an uncharacterized separation of service. It further states that a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005728
The applicants service record shows that on 25 May 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance. SUMMARY OF ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING: Type of Hearing: Record Review Date: 11 September 2013 Location:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005733
On 2 February 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. However, after examining the applicants record of service, his military records, and the documents and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005737
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates on 14 December 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for wrongfully using cocaine. On 28 December 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005749
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 25 October 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130005749 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The evidence contained in the applicants...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005750
THE APPLICANTS REQUEST AND STATEMENT: 1. On 21 November 2008, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed an under other than honorable conditions discharge. However, the Army Discharge Review Board considered the applicant for a possible upgrade as instructed in pertinent part by Department of Defense Instruction 1332.28 which stipulates that a request for review from an applicant without an honorable discharge shall be treated as a request for a change to an...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005820
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 28 August 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130005820 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005879
The record shows that on 9 January 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, for misconduct-commission of a serious offense, specifically for the following offenses: a. On 13 February 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005881
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a DD Form 293. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005883
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 September 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130005883 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Discharge Received: Under Other Than...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005885
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. On 10 June 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant contends that he had good service which included serving in Iraq and earning an ARCOM.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005893
The record indicates the applicant was separated from the Army for homosexual admission, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Discharge received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 15 July 2005 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Homosexual Conduct (Admission), AR 635-200, Chapter 15-3b, JRB, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: Finance Management Company, 101st Soldier Support Battalion, Fort Campbell, KY f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 9 September 2003, 4 years g....
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005896
Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 5 October 2012 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: NIF e. Unit of assignment: 2-334th Regiment (BCT), Granite City, IL f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 20 July 2010, terminal date of Reserve obligation 21 January 2013 g. Current Enlistment Service: 2 years, 2 months, 16 days h. Total Service: 7 years, 8 months, 3 days i. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army 3...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005898
IN THE CASE OF: Ms. BOARD DATE: 16 October 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130005898 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The DD Form 214 indicates she was released...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005901
On 11 May 2012, the separation authority, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, for a pattern of misconduct. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. Army Regulation 635-200,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005905
He was ordered to active duty for initial entry training on 10 January 2006. The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates on 27 October 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005908
Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 15 August 2002 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial, AR 635-200 Chapter 10, KFS, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: B Co, 1st Bn, 13th Armored Rgmt, Fort Riley, KS f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 25 September 2001, 3 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 0 years, 10 months, 21 days h. Total Service: 0 years, 10 months, 21 days i. On 26 July 2002, the separation authority approved the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005909
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 9 October 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130005909 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005914
Based on the above misconduct, the unit commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge, and advised the applicant of his rights. Army Regulation 635-200 specifically requires the separation authority to state on the record that the misconduct from a previous enlistment was not considered for the purpose of characterization, the absence of such a statement makes the record irregular and the Army Discharge Review Board must consider this as an issue of fact when...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005929
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 4 August 2005 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Misconduct, AR 635-200, 14-12c(2), JKK, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: HHC, 82d Airborne Division, Fort Bragg, NC f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 16 September 2004, 3 years and 21 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 0 years, 10 months, 19 days h. Total Service: 0 years, 10 months, 19 days i. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes), in effect at...