ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004492
Applicant Name: ????? On 7 July 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, contingent upon his receiving a characterization of service of no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004493
Applicant Name: ????? Furthermore, he states he would like to further his education. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004521
Applicant Name: ????? On 15 October 1998, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004526
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 15 August 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition for being diagnosed by competent medical authority with a mental condition, Dysthymic Disorder, which is a major depressive disorder, manifesting disturbance of emotional control sufficiently severe that his ability to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004532
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states: I wish to submit the following statement in support of my request for an upgrade to my character of service. Further, the analyst acknowledges the applicant's in service accomplishments as stated in his application which included his combat service.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004550
Applicant Name: ????? EF married the applicants sister-in-law and agreed that EF and his wife would live with the applicant and wife and that EF would pay $400 a month rent starting in September. After a thorough review of the applicants records and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004638
The applicant's record contains an approved Bar to Reenlistment, dated 18 August 2002. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization. This single incident of misconduct clearly diminished the quality of the applicant's service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004658
Applicant Name: ????? On 1 June 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The analyst determined that before initiating action to separate the applicant, the command ensured the applicant was appropriately counseled about the deficiencies, which could lead to separation.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004670
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: On 21 October 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition for being diagnosed by competent medical authority with an adjustment disorder with anxiety, which is incompatible with military service and recommended the applicants discharge with an entry level uncharacterized separation of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004672
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 11 August 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood for failing to provide an adequate family care plan and absenting herself (AWOL) from her unit and Fort Hood on three separate occasions, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 13 August 2008, the separation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004739
The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Online application and DD Form 214 for the period of service under review. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004742
Applicant Name: ????? On 3 March 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, the issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004770
Applicant Name: ????? On 7 July 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Online application, Recommendation for Award, dated 26 August 2009, Personnel Action, dated 21 February 2008, 12 July 2008, and 27 May 2009, DD Form 214 for the period of service under review.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004785
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 July 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military life by not being able to meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful completion of training because of lack of aptitude, ability, motivation, and self-discipline; demonstrated...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004789
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. In an undated memorandum, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004790
Applicant Name: ????? The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of regulation will normally be honorable, but will be uncharacterized if the Soldier is in an entry-level status. The analyst determined no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicants record and the applicant's service did not warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004791
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004803
Applicant Name: ????? On 16 November 2004, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an Administrative Separation Board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 18 January 2005, the separation authority approved the conditional waiver request, waived further...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004842
On 5 May 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 3 June 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004851
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 135-178 sets forth the policies, standards, and procedures to ensure the readiness and competency of the U.S. Army while providing for the orderly administrative separation of Army National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) enlisted Soldiers for a variety of reasons. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. c. Response to Issues,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004870
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 March 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct, for being arrested for disobeying a Command Policy and disrespecting noncommissioned officers for which he later received a Field Grade Article 15 (011107); Soldiers witnessed him wrongfully using illegal controlled...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004925
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 March 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for assaulting his spouse (070315); receiving a Company Grade Article 15 (070327) for three incidents of failure to report; and violating the no-contact order placed on him by his commander (070914 and 080121), with a general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004926
On 27 May 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge or a change to the applicant's...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004930
Applicant Name: ????? Service of Soldiers separated because of unsatisfactory performance for failure of the Army Physical Fitness Test will be characterized as honorable or general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated 15 February 2012; Picture depicting Commander's Coin; Certificate of Achievement, dated 1 September 2004; DD Form 214 for service under current review.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004952
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that his discharge is inequitable because; although, he was discharged for drug use the type of discharge generally given for this type of offense is a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 23 June 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant's discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005020
Applicant Name: ????? On 9 December 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The record shows that during a TA-50 inspection, the command discovered an illegal drug in his room and when questioned by CID, he was informed of his rights and he chose to provide a statement in which he admitted to wrongfully using an illegal drug.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005072
Applicant Name: ????? On 8 February 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005162
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200, states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. The analyst determined no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicants record and the applicant's service did not warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005173
The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the applicant produced any evidence, to support a change to the characterization of service granted. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated 12 July 2011 (but received 8 March 2012); Discharge Orders, dated 2 November 2010; DA Form 5960 (BAH...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005174
Applicant Name: ????? The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 149 dated 14 September 2011 in lieu of a DD Form 293.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005176
Applicant Name: ????? On 31 October 2007, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial CG Company Grade Article...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005232
Applicant Name: ????? I evidently did not understand the process that I was going through and had been waiting to be notified of a hearing from counseling services. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005299
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant further contends being in very stressful and depressing situations at the time of separation, he was having serious problems in his marriage and used drugs to deal with the problems. The applicant also contends another Soldier was caught for his third DUI and only got demoted from Specialist to PFC, extra duty and some rehab and right back to work with no other repercussions; for this reason his discharge was unfair and inequitable because it was a one...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005337
Applicant Name: ????? On 26 September 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant's discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature Approval Authority: ARCHIE L. DAVIS III Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005339
Applicant Name: ????? On 26 September 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant's discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005354
On 6 June 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditions discharge, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority further directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005370
Applicant Name: ????? On 23 October 2002, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 1 November 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005415
Applicant Name: ????? Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes if appropriate. Certification Signature Approval Authority: ARCHIE L. DAVIS III Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005420
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he was informed that upon his discharge as stated for medical reasons that his discharge or character of service would be honorable. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005455
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 December 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he went AWOL (110306-110909) and wrongfully used cocaine (101229), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 20 December 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005457
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he no longer uses medicine to control his existing prior to service (EPTS) condition and wants to return to the Army. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005566
Applicant Name: ????? On 27 May 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct," the separation code is "JKQ," and the reentry code is "RE 3."
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005640
Applicant Name: Application Receipt Date: 2012/03/08 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. In an undated memorandum, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005641
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant, states in effect, that she was separated from her US Army Reserve unit without due consideration given the circumstances at the time. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? The applicant's statements alone do not overcome the presumption of government regularity in this case and the application contains no documentation or further evidence in support of this request for an upgrade of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005646
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 080124 Discharge Received: Date: 080506 Chapter: 14-12b AR: 635-200 Reason: Pattern of Misconduct RE: SPD: JKA Unit/Location: HHC, 2nd Brigade Special Troops Battalion, 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division (Light Infantry), Fort Drum, NY Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 070730, failed to go to his appointed place of duty (070714), dereliction of duty; in that he failed to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005651
On 9 November 2007, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Army policy states that although an honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005767
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Recruiters can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes if appropriate.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005798
In the case of an ARNGUS or USAR Soldier on active duty (AD) or active duty training (ADT) who is to be discharged, the character of the period of service from which he/she is being discharged will be based solely on military behavior and performance of duty during the current period of service while actually performing AD or ADT. The DD Form 214 shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200 by reason of completion of required active service, with service...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005801
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states "Upon my Separation I was pregnant, and requested to get separated early based off the fact that my due date was my ETS date. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit a change to the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005805
On 9 June 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service...