ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003315
Applicant Name: ????? On 17 November 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature Approval Authority: ARCHIE L. DAVIS III Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003330
Applicant Name: ????? The Board recommended that the applicant be separated from the service with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The applicant was separated from the Army with an under other than honorable conditions discharge which was later upgraded to a general, under honorable conditions by the Army Discharge Review Board based on the length and quality of his service to include his combat service.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003355
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 060331 Chapter: 3 AR: 635-200 Reason: Court-Martial, Other RE: SPD: JJD Unit/Location: A Co, 2d Bn, 69th Armored Regiment, Fort Benning, GA Time Lost: 98 days, military confinement (031107-040212) Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 031212, failed to report to his designated place of duty on divers occasions, disobeyed a lawful order from a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003413
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 22 June 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003528
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 18 September 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003531
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003547
Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and document she submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit a change to the narrative reason for separation on the applicant's DD Form 214. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Personality...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003607
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The analyst also noted that the Army Discharge Review Board determined on 27 July 2011, that an administrative error was made and voted to change block 27 (Reentry Code) of the applicant's DD Form 214 to reflect Reentry Eligibility Code "3". The applicants statements alone do not overcome the governments presumption...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003699
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 December 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for going AWOL (081028-081103 and 080902-080909) stealing the cell phone of another Soldier, punching her in her jaw, and failure to report to his appointed place of duty on several occasions,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003703
Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge and or a change to the narrative reason for discharge on the applicant's DD Form 214. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003746
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: NIF Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 971009 Chapter: 14-12c(2) AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: HHD, 68th Corps Spt Bn, Fort Carson, CO Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. The analyst acknowledges the independent document (list of active medications) prescribed to the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003801
Applicant Name: ????? On 18 March 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Online Application, dated 28 February 2012 w/self-authored statement; medical documents, dated July 2009, 23 June 2010, and 21 June 2010; DD Form 214 for service under current review.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003810
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended separation with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 10 July 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003822
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of commission of a serious offense-abuse of illegal drugs for wrongfully using marijuana (090608-090707),for which he received an Article 15, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003846
Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003847
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003851
Applicant Name: ????? On 16 November 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", and the separation code is "JKK."
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003892
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 December 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for resisting arrest, providing alcohol to a minor, and failing to report to his designated place of duty on seven occasions, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. By the unsatisfactory performance, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003923
Applicant Name: ????? On 14 October 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Online application, dated 22 February 2012; Benefits at Separation Chart; DD Form 214 for service under current review.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003941
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 January 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for receiving a Company Grade Article 15, two Field Grade Artilce 15's, a positive urinalysis and serveral negative counselings, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. However, the separation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003948
Applicant Name: ????? Furthermore, notwithstanding the propriety of the applicant's discharge, the analyst found that someone in the discharge process erroneously entered on the applicant's DD Form 214, block 24, character of service as uncharacterized, the analyst noted that the applicant was no longer in entry-level status (ELS) and the separation authority approved the applicants discharge as general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature Approval Authority: ARCHIE L....
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003957
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 040826 Chapter: 15-3a AR: 635-200 Reason: Homosexual Act RE: SPD: JRA Unit/Location: 401st MP Co, Fort Hood, TX Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 040122, in that while at FOB Ironhorse, Iraq, between 1 August 2003 and 30 August 2003, violated a lawful general order, to wit: General Order Number 1A, United States Central Command, dated 19 December 2002, by...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003984
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 070706 Discharge Received: Date: 070727 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: C Co, 1-6 IN Rgt, Baumholder, Germany Time Lost: 121 days, AWOL (070108-070508), surrendered. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of that prior to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004064
Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", and the separation code is "JKK."
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004106
On 5 March 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander recommended separation with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 29 April 2010, the separation authority reviewed the administrative separation action and directed that the applicant be processed under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 14-12c, by reason of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004110
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 17 April 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue and documents submitted...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004117
Applicant Name: ????? On 4 September 2007, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, indicated that he unconditionally waived an administrative separation board as part of the court-martial plea agreement (070322), and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 7 September 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004118
Applicant Name: ????? However, upon reviewing the applicant's DD Form 214, the analyst found that someone in the discharge process erroneously entered on the applicant's DD Form 214, at block 12b the year of the "Separation Date This Period" as "2003." Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated 21 February 2012 with self-authored statement; DD Form 214 for service under current review.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004128
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 6 April 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of patter of misconduct for failing to report to formations on multiple occasions, being counseled without change in his lateness, and being charged with wrongfully possessing marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004149
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, "I have started a family and i (sic) am wanting to re join (sic) the army. The DD Form 214, indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, by reason of in lieu of trial by court-martial, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004209
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he has served his country honorably during the time he was on active duty. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated 17 February 2012; DD Form 214 for service under current review.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004212
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004215
Applicant Name: ????? On 29 October 2009, the applicant reviewed and concurred with the findings of the Entrance Physical Standard Board (EPSB) proceedings, and requested to be discharged from the Army. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004217
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 2 August 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3b, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual admission with an honorable discharge. The analyst noted that the applicant was in entry level status (ELS) at the time the unit commander initiated separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3b, AR...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004218
Applicant Name: ????? On 16 August 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief full in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004241
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, In Lieu Of Trial By Court-Martial, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Furthermore, notwithstanding the propriety of the applicant's discharge, the analyst found that someone in the discharge process erroneously entered on the applicant's DD Form 214, block 27, re-entry code as 3. In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined the re-entry code...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004244
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 14 October 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he was found drunk on duty (100823) and was arrested for driving under the influence (100529), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 1 November 2010, the separation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004248
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct (drug abuse), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct for wrongfully using illegal drugs, with a characterization of service of general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004253
Applicant Name: ????? On 27 July 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004254
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 2 July 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor commission of a serious offense, for being AWOL over 30 days, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 16 July 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004274
Applicant Name: ????? The record contains a properly constituted NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), indicating discharge under the provisions of Chapter 8, Paragraph 8-26e(2), NGR 600-200, by reason of act or patterns of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions, and a reentry code of 3. At the time of discharge, the applicant had completed 2 years, 1 month, and 25 days of total military service in the period under review.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004330
Applicant Name: ????? On 29 November 2005, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004403
Applicant Name: ????? On 10 August 2010, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004410
On 25 November 2009, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200, sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004413
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issues submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The analyst acknowledges the applicants in-service...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004428
Applicant Name: ????? On 17 August 2011, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The analyst noted the applicants issue about his medical conditions; however, in review of the applicants entire service record, the analyst found that these medical conditions did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004479
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The applicants statements alone do not overcome the governments presumption of regularity and he has not provided any documentation or further evidence in support of his request to change his characterization of discharge or any...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004482
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, "While i (sic) was in the military i (sic) was a young man who didn't know much about my self or other but when i (sic) was released from the military it wasn't because i (sic) wasn't able to do what was required of my or that i (sic) refused to train. Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: NIF Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 030304 Chapter: 11 AR: 635-200 Reason:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004487
Applicant Name: ????? On 12 August 1998, the senior intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended the applicant's discharge be referred to an administrative separation board to consider whether the applicant should be separated from the Army. On 27 August 1998, the separation authority referred the applicant's discharge to a standing separation board to determined whether the applicant should be separated from the Army.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004490
Applicant Name: ????? He would greatly appreciate it if the Board could grant him his request. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Online application, dated 29 February 2012; Report of Mental Status Evaluation, dated 1 February 2010; Separation Orders, dated 27 May 2010; DD Form 214 for service under current review.