Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2012/02/16 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he would like an upgrade of his discharge for the purpose of receiving veteran's preference without problems, job achievement, and personal satisfaction.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 081208
Discharge Received: Date: 081229 Chapter: 14-12c(1) AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (AWOL) RE: SPD: JKD Unit/Location: HHC AR Bde, Fort Riley, KS
Time Lost: AWOL x 2 for a total of 42 days; 36 days (080902-080908), mode of return unknown; 6 days (081028-081102), mode of return unknown.
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 081209, AWOL (081027-081031), leaving his appointed place of duty (081111), stealing the cellular telephone of another Soldier valued at $100.00 (081030), assaulting another Soldier (081030), failure to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty x 4 (081103, 081112, 081121, and 081125), reduction to E1; forfeiture of $673.00 pay per month for two months; extra duty for 45 days; and restriction for 45 days, (FG).
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 19
Current ENL Date: 071115 Current ENL Term: 03 Years 25 Weeks
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 01 Mos, 03 Days ?????
Total Service: 01 Yrs, 01 Mos, 03 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E2 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 74D10/Chemical Ops Specialist GT: 110 EDU: GED Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 8 December 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for going AWOL (081028-081103 and 080902-080909) stealing the cell phone of another Soldier, punching her in her jaw, and failure to report to his appointed place of duty on several occasions, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights.
On 18 December 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
On 19 December 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
The applicant's record contains a Police Desk Blotter, dated 8 January 2011.
The analyst noted that on the applicant's DD Form 214 block 25, "Separation Authority" reads "AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(1)," block 26 "Separation (SPD) Code " reads "JKD," and block 28 "Narrative Reason For Separation," reads "Misconduct (AWOL)."
However, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, which the separation (SPD) code is "JKQ."
The applicant's record contain a Military Police Report, dated 30 October 2008.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
The applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By his misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.
The analyst noted the applicant's issue about receiving veteran's preference without problems, job achievement, and personal satisfaction. However, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Post-9/11 or Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board. Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.
Furthermore, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.
Additionally, notwithstanding the propriety of the applicant's discharge, the analyst found that someone in the discharge process erroneously entered on the applicant's DD Form 214, block 25, separation authority as AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(1), block 26, separation code as JKD," and block 28 "narrative reason for separation, as "misconduct (AWOL)." In view of the foregoing, the analyst recommends to the Board that an administrative correction be made to block 25, separation authority to AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, block 26, separation code to JKQ, and block 28 "narrative reason for separation, to " misconduct (serious offense)," as approved by the separation authority.
Except for the foregoing modifications the analyst determined that the characterization of service was both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 25 July 2012 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 and DD Form 214 for the period of service under review.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief.
Additionally, notwithstanding the propriety of the applicant's discharge, the board found that someone in the discharge process erroneously entered on the applicant's DD Form 214, block 25, separation authority as AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(1), block 26, separation code as JKD," and block 28 "narrative reason for separation, as "misconduct (AWOL)." Accordingly, the Board voted to change block 25, "Separation Authority" to read "AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c," block 26 "Separation (SPD) Code " to read "JKQ," and block 28 "Narrative Reason For Separation," to read "Misconduct (Serious Offense)."
Except for the foregoing modifications to the applicant's Separation Authority, Separation (SPD) Code, and Narrative Reason for Feparation, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
X. Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: Misconduct (Serious Offense)
Other: The Board voted to change block 25, "Separation Authority" to read "AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c," block 26 "Separation (SPD) Code " to read "JKQ," and block 28 "Narrative Reason For Separation," to read "Misconduct (Serious Offense)."
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
XI. Certification Signature
Approval Authority:
ARCHIE L. DAVIS III
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder
?
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20120003699
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 4 of 4 pages
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110008112
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for being AWOL and numerous failures to report, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 30 July 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090016574
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012573
The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12c(1), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct with a general, under honorable conditions separation of service. However, records show the separation action was initiated under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12, AR 635-200, misconductcommission of a serious offense, which according to AR 635-5-1, Separation Program Designator (SPD)/Reentry (RE) Codes Cross-Reference Table,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007720
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Except for the foregoing modification to the applicant's separation authority and the separation code, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100018798
Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, Department of Veterans Affairs Decision Letter, and DD Form 214 for the period of service under review. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board found that someone in the discharge process erroneously entered on the applicant's DD...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120013273
Applicant Name: ????? The analyst recommends that an administrative change be made to block 25, separation authority to read AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, and block 26, separation code to JKQ, as it was approved by the separation authority. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: Change the authority for separation to AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c with a corresponding SPD code of JKQ.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006416
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with general, under honorable conditions discharge. However, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Chapter 14,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006646
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 August 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for being found guilty by a Summary Court-Martial for multiple charges of wrongfully using cocaine, ecstasy and methamphetamine (050822), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023686
Applicant Name: ????? On 6 February 2001, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an Administrative Separation Board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002170
On 13 October 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 24 January 2004, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(1), AR 635-200, for misconduct, a Separation Program Designator code (SPD) of JKD and an RE code of 3. Army...