ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090018687
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue, and determined that the record does not support the applicants contention, and no evidence to support it has been submitted by the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090018697
Applicant Name: ????? Before initiating action to separate him from the Army, the command ensured the applicant was appropriately counseled about the deficiencies, which could lead to separation. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090018699
The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090018718
Applicant Name: ????? On 17 December 2001, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090018750
Applicant Name: ????? Further, the evidence of record shows that the applicant consulted with legal counsel and indicated that he understood that he would receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and did not submit a statement in his own behalf, when he was afforded the opportunity during the separation proceedings. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: None submitted by the applicant.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090018777
Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military record, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090018808
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 December 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs for wrongful use of phencyclidine, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090018908
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 April 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he was convicted by a Summary Court-Martial on (080417) for being AWOL from (071222-080123), and on (070825), he received a Field Grade Article 15 for being AWOL from (070713-070820), with a general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090018957
Applicant Name: ????? On 24 July 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition, in which the applicant was diagnosed with adjustment disorder with disturbance emotions and conduct on 23 June 2008 and was re-evaluated on 16 July 2008 with the same diagnosis with an honorable discharge. Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019020
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: None submitted by the applicant.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019028
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 April 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he wrongfully used marijuana on two separate occasions, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 19 May 2005, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019031
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: The applicant submitted two character reference letters in support of his records review.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019035
Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicants discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019037
Applicant Name: ????? The regulation requires an uncharacterized discharge for separation under this Chapter. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019052
Applicant Name: ????? By the unsatisfactory performance, the applicant diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable characterization of service. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019096
On 17 June 2004, the separation authority approved the conditional waiver request, waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 214, unit commander's memorandum dated 15 June 2004, character reference letter. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019098
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 28 October 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he engaged in numerous acts of misconduct that has included being drunk on duty on more than one occasion; numerous failures to report to work, failure to follow lawful orders, occasional absenteeism, and substandard...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019106
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: None submitted by the applicant.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019123
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the applicants length and quality of his service to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019132
Applicant Name: ????? On 25 January 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, these accomplishments do not provide the Board a basis upon which to grant relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019138
The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies. The analyst noted the applicant's issue that his discharge was based on one isolated incident in 18 months of service, with no other adverse action; and that he is currently trying to see about reenlisting on active duty so that he can finish his term. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019145
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (drug abuse) with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)" and the separation code is "JKK."
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019152
Applicant Name: ????? On 26 July 2005, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board. On 18 October 2005, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of other than honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019263
Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-120, by reason of unacceptable conduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Having examined all the circumstances, the analyst determined that the applicant's single incident of misconduct did indeed adversely affect the quality of his service, and was prejudicial to good order and discipline.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019405
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: None submitted by the applicant.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019419
Applicant Name: ????? The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct" and the separation code is "JKQ", and the reentry code is "RE 3". Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019430
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019432
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 March 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for failing to go at the time prescribed to her appointed place x 3 (070410, 070711, and 080117), absenting herself from her unit 070830 and did remain so until 070830, and disobeying a lawful order from a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019436
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: The applicant submitted a DD Form 149 dated 28 August 2009, a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period of service ending 7 August 2006, and a DD Form 31 (Request and Authority for Leave) dated 5 May 2006.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019439
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019489
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Each case is decided on its own merits when an applicant submits a DD Form 293 requesting a change in discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019510
Applicant Name: ????? On 3 September 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019552
Applicant Name: ????? However, the analyst considered the applicants available military records (i.e., DD Form 214, which shows the separation authority; reason and characterization; separation code and the reentry eligibility code ) during the initial portion of the enlistment under review, and based on the afforementioned document the analyst determined that this service was not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an upgrade to the characterization of discharge. Additionally,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019581
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 August 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for testing positive for THC (060428 and 030711), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 9 August 2006, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and submitted a statement in his...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019608
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 081118 Discharge Received: Date: 081219 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Company B, 369th Signal Battalion, Fort Gordon, GA. Time Lost: AWOL x 1 from (080904-081021) for a total of 48 days. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019638
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019642
Applicant Name: ????? There is no evidence that the applicant was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019646
On 4 March 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an Administrative Separation Board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 22 August 2008, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed that...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019874
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states: "The reason why I would like my discharge characterization changed to a general is because I believe that with a general code I will be able to better myself and provide a better future for my family. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019879
The regulation also directs that commanders will not take action prescribed in this Chapter in lieu of disciplinary action; requires that the diagnosis concludes the disorder is so severe that the Soldiers ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired; and states that separation for personality disorder is not appropriate when separation is warranted under Chapter 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, or 15; Army Regulation 604-10 or Army Regulation 635-40. The narrative...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019908
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial with an uncharacterized discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019915
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 24 May 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for his inability to manage his financial affairs in excess of $7,637.52; and has interfered with his ability to perform his military duties in a satisfactory manner; which resulted in an arrest warrant being issued for him by Bell...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019978
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 September 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct; in that she lacked the motivation to pass the push up event on the final APFT; she had stated orally and in writing that she no longer had the motivation nor the desire to continue training; she refused to be a new...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019979
Applicant Name: ????? On 7 August 2002 , the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019980
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019982
Applicant Name: ????? After being separated from the Army, I realize that being a soldier is what I truly want to do with my life. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019985
On 6 November 2006, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 22 November 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019996
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he was discharged on one incident in his 22 months of service and was characterized as a pattern of misconduct, and he would be very appreciative, if he could reenlist in the US Army.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090020004
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 25 October 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he wrongfully used marijuana on or between (010728-010828); and was AWOL from (010706-010826), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 25 October 2001, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090020006
On 26 March 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The record contains a Military Police Report dated 7 September 2008. b. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW...