Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019419
Original file (AR20090019419.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2009/11/05	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, on his DD Form 149, that there was no offense of any kind in his record, nor did an offense involving another soldier happen.  He is requesting that the separation code JKQ be corrected and that he wants to reenlist as an active duty soldier for the armed forces.  

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 991207
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 991223   Chapter: 14-12c       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKQ   Unit/Location: HQ & HQ Company, 1-501 Parachute Infantry Regiment, Fort Richardson, AK 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 990826, operated a passenger car, while drunk and in a reckless manner on or about (990730); reduction to Private (E-2); forfeiture of $714.00 pay per month for two months, one month suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (000123); and extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG).

Article 15, 990909, willfully disobeyed a lawful command from LTC, a superior commissioned officer on or about (990816); reduction to Private (E-1); forfeiture of $479.00 pay per month for two months; extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG). 

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  22
Current ENL Date: Reenl/990125    Current ENL Term: 3 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	0 Yrs, 10 Mos, 29 Days ?????
Total Service:  		4 Yrs, 3 Mos, 11 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	RA 950913-990124/HD
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 91B10 Medical Specialist   GT: 104   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Alaska (960404-991223)   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: AAM, GCMDL, NDSM, ASR, OSR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 7 December 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he received two Field Grade Article 15's, one for driving under the influence and one for violating an order by the Post Commander, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. 
       
       The record contains an approved Bar to Reenlistment dated 10 September 1999; a Military Police Report in reference to his offense of failing to stop for a stop sign and failing to use lights on a vehicle in hours of darkness dated 30 July 1999, and a Alcoholic Influence Report dated 30 July 1999. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. 

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance. 
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he would like to have his separation code corrected and that he is currently wanting to reenlist as an active duty soldier for the armed forces.  The narrative reason for separation is governed by specific directives.  The applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200.  The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct" and the separation code is "JKQ", and the reentry code is "RE 3". 
       
       Army Regulation 635-5, Separation Documents, governs preparation of the DD Form 214 and dictates that entry of the narrative reason for separation, entered in block 28, separation code, entered in block 26, and RE Code, entered in block 27 of the form, will be entered exactly as listed in tables 2-2 or 2-3 of AR 635-5-1, Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes.  The regulation further stipulates that no deviation is authorized.  There is no provision for any other reason to be entered under this regulation. 
       
       Further, if the applicant desires to reenlist, he should contact the local recruiter to determine his eligibility to reenlist.  Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes.  
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 
       
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 25 August 2010         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: None submitted by the applicant.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20090019419
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007720

    Original file (AR20090007720.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Except for the foregoing modification to the applicant's separation authority and the separation code, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100018553

    Original file (AR20100018553.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 January 2000, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the board that the applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007576

    Original file (AR20120007576.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 23 July 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (Commission of a Serious Offense) for disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer, willfully disobeying a superior commissioned officer, disrespect toward a noncommissioned officer, disobeying a lawful order from a...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080013694

    Original file (AR20080013694.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 19 July 1999, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Further, notwithstanding the propriety of the applicant's discharge, the analyst found that someone in the discharge process erroneously entered on the applicant's DD Form 214, block 24, character of service as “Honorable.” In view of this clerical error, the Board is...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016083

    Original file (AR20110016083.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant contends that he was released from the military, because his son burnt his hand, and after having surgery, he lossened the bandages. On 20 September 1999, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012049

    Original file (AR20090012049.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 25 May 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of commission of a serious offense for wrongful use of a controlled substance (990513-990412), failure to be at the appointed place of duty x2 (990416 and 980803), AWOL x2 (980210-980310 and 971123-971203), and charges of communicating a threat, unlawful entry,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110021558

    Original file (AR20110021558.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 August 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for testing positive for cocaine (990216), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 24 August 1999, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120013273

    Original file (AR20120013273.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The analyst recommends that an administrative change be made to block 25, separation authority to read AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, and block 26, separation code to JKQ, as it was approved by the separation authority. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: Change the authority for separation to AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c with a corresponding SPD code of JKQ.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110003868

    Original file (AR20110003868.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 7 August 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he violated a lawful general regulation by drinking underage on several occasions, committing assault, violating a unit policy regarding curfew, and being drunk and disorderly, with a general, under...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011890

    Original file (AR20090011890.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 November 1999, the applicant waived his right to consult with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 13 December 1999, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. RE Code: Grade Restoration: No...