ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006169C071116
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board per his offer to plead guilty (pretrial agreement), dated 9 January 2004, and did not submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 6 February 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006169C071116
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board per his offer to plead guilty (pretrial agreement), dated 9 January 2004, and did not submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 6 February 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006169aC071121
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 22 January 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense (wrongful use of marijuana, wrongful possession of marijuana, and wrongfully introduced illegal drugs onto a military installation), with an under other then honorable conditions discharge. On 6 February 2004, the separation authority...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006172
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he had been a dedicated and hard working Soldier throughout his career with the Army. On 1 March 2004, the separation authority approved the discharge with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006193
Time Lost: AWOL x 1 for 185 days (060105-060708). Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006195
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006199
Current ENL Service: 1 Yrs, 6 Mos, 15 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 29 March 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense in that he wrongfully used marijuana, a controlled substance with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 27 April 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006217C071116
Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKK (i.e., misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs). c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s available records for the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents he submitted, the analyst finds no facts that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge and recommends that relief be denied in this case. That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006217C071116
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKK (i.e., misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs). c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available records for the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents he submitted, the analyst finds no facts that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge and recommends that relief be denied in this case.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006217aC071121
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's DD Form 293 and attached documents. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKK (i.e., misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs). That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 14, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006646C071116
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006646C071116
Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 020920 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Time Lost: Absent without leave for a total of 415 days (010627-020815). It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board Discussion,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006646aC071121
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006966C071116
Application Receipt Date: 070517 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-91 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006966C071116
Application Receipt Date: 070517 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-91 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006972C071116
On 27 March 2003, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Yes No Counsel: Witnesses/Observers: Exhibits Submitted: No VIII.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006972C071116
On 27 March 2003, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Yes No Counsel: Witnesses/Observers: Exhibits Submitted: No VIII.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006972aC071121
On 27 March 2003, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Yes No Counsel: Witnesses/Observers: Exhibits Submitted: VIII.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006982C071116
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 28 January 1993, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct (he cannot or will not to adapt military life, he cannot meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful completion of training because of lack of ability, motivation, and self discipline. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006982C071116
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 28 January 1993, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct (he cannot or will not to adapt military life, he cannot meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful completion of training because of lack of ability, motivation, and self discipline. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006982aC071121
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 28 January 1993, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct (he cannot or will not adapt military life, he cannot meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful completion of training because of lack of ability, motivation, and self discipline. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006987C071116
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issues he submitted, the analyst found that the characterization of service granted is inequitable. The applicant was charged with AWOL and while still in an entry-level status voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial. Yes No Counsel: Witnesses/Observers: None Exhibits Submitted: The applicant...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006987C071116
On 19 March 2004, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial. On 20 August 2004, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The applicant was charged with AWOL and while still in an entry-level status voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006987aC071121
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issues he submitted, the analyst found that the characterization of service granted is inequitable. The applicant was charged with AWOL and while still in an entry-level status voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial. Yes No Counsel: Witnesses/Observers: Exhibits Submitted: VIII.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070007000C071116
Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. Yes No Counsel: Witnesses/Observers: Exhibits Submitted: None VIII. Board Decision The discharge was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The characterization of service was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The narrative reasons were: Equitable Inequitable DRB voting record: Change 0 No change 5 - Character Change 0...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070007000C071116
On 12 July 2005, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents he submitted, the analyst recommend that the applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded to general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070007000aC071121
Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents he submitted, the analyst recommend that the applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070007235C071116
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 25 January 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense (use of an illegal drug-cocaine), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 28 January 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070007235C071116
The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 28 January 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070007235aC071121
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 25 January 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense (use of an illegal drug-cocaine), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 28 January 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070007320C071116
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070007320C071116
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070007539aC071121
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070008309
On 9 March 2005, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the former service member was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070008309aC071121
On 9 March 2005, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the former service member was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the former service member's record of service during the period of enlistment...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070008579
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (drug abuse), with a characterization of service of uncharacterized. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKK (i.e., misconduct- drug abuse).
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070008905aC071121
The unit commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Discussion, Determination, and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009433
Applicant Name: ????? On 4 October 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. The applicant, as a soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009435
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009440
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 26 March 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military life due to an adjustment disorder, with an uncharacterized discharge. On 27 March 2001, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be separated from the Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009443
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 September 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense, for breaking restriction, for being AWOL repeatedly and for failure to report (050601-050605, 050615-050627, 050630-050701, 050714-050715, 050803-050804, 050822-050823), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 12...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009456
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 October 1996, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor commission of a serious offense (wrongfully used marijuana between (961212-960716) and damaged another soldier's private property while engaged in a physical altercation, used provoking words and assaulted two unknown males, and were drunk...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009624
Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009629
Applicant Name: ???? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009630
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: I received an other than honorable discharge in lieu of court martial for going AWOL. Since I have left the army I divorce my husband, obtained a 2 year associated degree in Paralegal studies and have had 2 children.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009634
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service in lieu trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009635
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009638
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009641
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009642
Applicant Name: ????? On 5 June 2006, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Furthermore, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3 and a reason of "Physical Condition, Not a Disability" as stipulated by Army Regulation 635-5-1, no other reason is authorized based on the diagnosis.