Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006982aC071121

Application Receipt Date: 070518

Prior Review    Prior Review Date: None

I.  Applicant Request
Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change

Issues: See applicant's DD Form 293 and attached document.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Yes    No        Tender Offer:        

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits

III.  Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge:    Date: 930203
Discharge Received:     Date: 930219
Chapter: 11    AR: 635-200
Reason: Entry Level Status
RE:     SPD: JGA
Unit/Location: Company B, 122nd Aviation Regiment, 8th Transportation
Brigade, Fort Eustis, VA 23604-5470

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 930120-Without authority, absented
himself from unit on or about (930103 until 930105), (Company Grade).

Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
DOB:  710329
Current ENL Date: 920813    Current ENL Term: 6 Years       
Current ENL Service: 00  Yrs, 06 Mos, 07 Days      
Total Service:  00  Yrs, 06 Mos, 07 Days      
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E2
Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No
MOS: None   GT: 88   EDU: College Transcript   Overseas: None   Combat:
None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR
V.  Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record:
Current Address:
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

      a.  Facts and Circumstances:
      The evidence of record shows that on 28 January 1993, the unit
commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under
the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level
performance and conduct (he cannot or will not adapt military life, he
cannot meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful completion of
training because of lack of ability, motivation, and self discipline.  He
was given ample opportunity to improve, with no satisfactory results.  This
will signiicantly effect his ability to function efectively in the
military), with an uncharacterized discharge.  He was advised of his
rights.  The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the
impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own
behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the
service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  On 9 February 1993,
the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed
that the applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized separation of
service.

      b.  Legal Basis for Separation:
      Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the
separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 11, of this regulation, in
effect at the time, provided, for the separation of personnel due to
unsatisfactory performance, conduct, or both, while in an entry level
status.  This provision of regulation applied to individuals who had
demonstrated that they were not qualified for retention because they could
not adapt socially or emotionally to military life, or because they lacked
the aptitude, ability, motivation or self discipline for military service,
or that they had demonstrated characteristics not compatible with
satisfactory continued service.  The separation policy applies to Soldiers
who cannot meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful completion
of training because of lack of aptitude, ability, motivation or self-
discipline.  The regulation requires uncharacterized service for separation
under this chapter.





      c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
      After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during
the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents he
submitted, the analyst noted from the evidence of record that the applicant
received an uncharacterized separation while in an entry-level status
(ELS).  The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as
entry-level status, with the description of service as uncharacterized.
Army Regulation 635-200, provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in
entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.  The
purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary
period.  Soldiers who are found to lack the necessary motivation,
adaptability, self-discipline, ability, or attitude to become productive
Soldiers may be expeditiously separated while in entry-level status.  A
fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly
warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct
and/or performance of duty.  The analyst determined that no such unusual
circumstances were present in the applicant’s record and his service did
not warrant an honorable discharge.  Therefore, the analyst determined that
the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both
proper and equitable.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing:                  Date: 5 November 2007
Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No

Counsel:      

Witnesses/Observers:      

Exhibits Submitted:      



VIII.  Board Decision
The discharge was:                Proper           Improper
                                             Equitable        Inequitable

The characterization of service was:   Proper            Improper
                                             Equitable        Inequitable

The narrative reasons were:             Equitable        Inequitable

DRB voting record:                 Change 0    No change 5   - Character
                                   Change 0    No change 5   - Reason
                                   (Board member names available upon
request)

IX.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the
period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony, and considering
the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the
discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief.





















Case report reviewed and verified by: Mr. Kennneth McFarley, Examiner

X.  Board Action Directed
No Change
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: None
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes  Grade: None

XI.  Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority:

MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board

Official:


CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON            DATE:      
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006982C071116

    Original file (AR20070006982C071116.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 28 January 1993, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct (he cannot or will not to adapt military life, he cannot meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful completion of training because of lack of ability, motivation, and self discipline. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006982C071116

    Original file (AR20070006982C071116.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 28 January 1993, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct (he cannot or will not to adapt military life, he cannot meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful completion of training because of lack of ability, motivation, and self discipline. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000164C080324

    Original file (AR20060000164C080324.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized separation of service. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000153C080324

    Original file (AR20060000153C080324.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 2 January 1991, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct, with an uncharacterized discharge. The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000143C080324

    Original file (AR20060000143C080324.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 28 May 1997, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct, with an uncharacterized discharge. A Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012028

    Original file (AR20060012028.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 03 Mos, 29 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 10 January 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct, with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011598

    Original file (AR20060011598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 12 March 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct (your current emotional and mental state preclude you from successfully or effectively completing the training tasks for the course and adapting to the military environment), with an uncharacterized discharge. On 17 March 2003, the separation...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008911

    Original file (AR20060008911.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 11 December 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct (sociologically unfit and lack self-discipline, and desire needed to complete basic training), with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060007459

    Original file (AR20060007459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf dated 1 August 2005. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. Certification Signature and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010080

    Original file (AR20060010080.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 2 June 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct (failure to adapt), with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s...