ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014317
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See enclosed DD Form 293 submitted by the applicant. Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 03 Mos, 06 Days ????? The separation authority (Commander 1st Armored Division), approved the conditional waiver submitted by the applicant's waiving his administrative separation board, and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014322
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: NA VIII.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014382
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 22 May 1997, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for testing positive for using a controlled substance on three different occasions, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014384
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Issue a new...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014392l
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014394
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 6 November 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014397
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(1) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicable Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014399
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant's chain of command's recommendation for approval of his request for discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge is not part of the available record and the analyst presumed Government regularity in the discharge process. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014405
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents he submitted, the analyst recommends that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed No...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014406
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 14 February 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct for AWOL x 2 (031218-040109) and (021215-030110); and was FTR on numerous occasions, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014410
Applicant Name: ????? I thank the Board for their time. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014569
Applicant Name: ????? His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service-in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014570
Applicant Name: ????? That NGB Form 22 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-26g (2), NGR 600-200, by reason of erroneous enlistment or extension, with service uncharacterized, and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) Code of "3." Further, the Soldier may be separated with service uncharacterized while in an enry-level status.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014572
The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014574
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 29 October 2004, the separation authority approved the unconditional waiver submitted by the applicant, and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014576
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 March 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for wrongful disobeying a superior commissioned officer (060403), fled apprehension (060403), and making a false official statement (060403), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014577
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c (2) by reason of misconduct (drug abuse), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKK (i.e., misconduct- drug abuse). The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c (2) by reason of misconduct-drug abuse, with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014753
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 7 March 1997, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014768
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct" and the separation code is "JKQ." Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014985
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 7 August 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for unwilling or unable to adjust to military life, lacks the motivation, self discipline, aptitude and desire to adjust to military life and has received numerous counseling and Article 15s, with an uncharacterized discharge. The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014987
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 23 May 2005, the separation authority approved the findings and recommendations of the administartive separation board, and directed that the applicant be discharged from the service with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph-12b, AR 635-200 by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct, with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014995
Applicant Name: ????? On 14 February 2006, The United States Army Court of Military Review affirmed the approved findings of guilty and the sentence. After a thorough review of the applicants record and the issues he submitted, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board that clemency is not warranted.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015104
Applicant Name: ????? On 21 December 2006, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015124
On 1 June 2006, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditions discharge, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 24 August 2006, the separation authority reviewed the request for conditional waiver of an administrative...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015125
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct with an uncharacterized separation of service. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015126
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 980822 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: HHC, 19th TAACOM, APO AP 96218 Time Lost: AWOL for 792 days (960614-980815), mode of return unknown. Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. His DD Form 214 indicates that...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015127
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 4 May 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015129
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 15 July 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015130
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015139
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 061130 Discharge Received: Date: 061208 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015142
The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Procedurally, the applicant was required to consult with defense counsel and to voluntarily, and in writing, request separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015150
Applicant Name: ????? On 15 March 1999, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015152
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015153
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 08Mos, 02Days Includes two period of AWOL (050328, and 050610-050706) Total Service: 02 Yrs, 08Mos, 11Days The applicant's DD Form 214 under review incorrectly show the applicant Date Entered AD This Period" as; year 2002, month 12, and day 17, should read as; year 2002, month 11, and day 20, as found on the applicant's enlistment contract. Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 10 August 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015154
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of her case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. On 16 April 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015156
The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge On 12 November 2004, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015157
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 021127 Discharge Received: Date: 030115 Chapter: 14 AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: HHD, 27th MSB, Fort Hood, TX Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 011106, Wrongful use of cocaine between (010821 and 010921), reduction to E-1, forfeiture of $521.00 pay per month for two months, and 45 days restriction, (FG). The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015159
At the time of release from active duty training, the applicant had completed 6 months and 13 days of active military service in the period under review. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. (2) In the course of the review of the applicants military records and the issue she submitted, the analyst determined that the applicant's characterization of service...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015160
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 09Mos, 06Days ????? The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) MARK E. COLLINS Issue a new DD Form 214 Colonel, U.S. Army Change Characterization to: President,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015162
The separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015177
Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Issue a new DD Form 214 Colonel, U.S. Army Change Characterization to: President, Army Discharge Review Board Change Reason to: Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015222
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 April 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor underage drinking and being drunk on duty and for having received several negative counseling statements, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015223
On 3 October 2001, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. The analyst determined that the overall length and quality of the applicant's service to include his post service accomplishments mitigated the discrediting entries in his service record. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015225
Applicant Name: ????? On 31 January 1997, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015227
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015228
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 22 February 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct for his discreditable involvement with military authorities and his history of domestic violence dating back to (050209), for which he is currently facing 7 counts of assault in U.S. District Court with a court date of (060403), with an under other...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015231
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On April 1, 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 1 No change 4 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015232
Army Regulation 635-200 states that a soldier is in an entry-level status if the soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a soldiers service will be uncharacterized when his separation is initiated while the soldier is in entry level status. The analyst recommends to the Board that the reason for discharge and the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015234
Applicant Name: ????? On 16 September 1992, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 5 No change 0 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Issue a new DD Form 214 Colonel, U.S. Army Change Characterization to: President, Army Discharge Review Board Change Reason to: Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015235
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12b by reason of misconduct- pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The specific facts and circumstances leading to the applicants discharge are not contained in the available records; however the record does contain a Memorandum of Notification Legal Sufficiency Review, dated 20 October 1992 which states the Commander,...