Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015231
Original file (AR20070015231.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  

Application Receipt Date: 071031	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See enclosed DD Form 293  and supporting documents submitted by the Applicant


II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   ?????

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 050316
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 050429   Chapter: 14-12C(2)    AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: HQs Co, 2nd Bn, 37th Armor Regiment, APO AE 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 050118  wrongfully using cocaine, marijuana, and overindulgence in intoxicating liquor incapacitated for the proper performance of duties reduction to E-1; forfeiture of $288 for 2 months, one month suspended; restriction and extra duty for 45 days (FG).

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  20
Current ENL Date: 031218    Current ENL Term: 3 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	1 Yrs, 4Mos, 12Days ?????
Total Service:  		3 Yrs, 8Mos, 28Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	HD 010802-031217 
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 92G10 Food Service Spc   GT: 87   EDU: AA Degree   Overseas: Iraq   Combat: Iraq 030511-040717
Decorations/Awards: AAM-3, PUC, AGCM, NDSM, GWOTEM, GWOTSM, ASR, OSR-2

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Corona, CA
Post Service Accomplishments: Received AA from Riverside Community College

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on March 16, 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—for wrongful use of cocaine and marijuana, with a general under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge.  On April 1, 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.  

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue and documents he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  By his misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance. Furthermore, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “4.”  An RE code of “4” can not be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 080912         Location: Washington DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 1    No change 4
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
Issue a new DD Form 214  					         Colonel, U.S. Army
Change Characterization to: 			         President, Army Discharge Review Board 
Change Reason to:  
Other: NA										
RE Code: 									 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA 
       	
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20070015231
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080010829

    Original file (AR20080010829.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the Applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the characterization of service to fully honorable. However, the board found that the reason for discharge was fully supported by the record and voted not to change it.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100020954

    Original file (AR20100020954.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 26 May 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for testing positive for the use of cocaine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008149

    Original file (AR20060008149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 05 Mos, 28 Days ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 13 May 1993, the separation authority approved the findings and recommendations of the board and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006031

    Original file (AR20060006031.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 28 March 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense (abuse of illegal drugs, wrongful use of cocaine on divers occasions 1 December 2004-16 January 2005, wrongful possession of cocaine 13 January 2005, and conspiracy to wrongfully possess a controlled substance 13 January 2005), with an under...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016384

    Original file (AR20080016384.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011546

    Original file (AR20060011546.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060005710

    Original file (AR20060005710.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 4 March 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense (abuse of illegal drugs "cocaine"), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007059

    Original file (AR20100007059.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 13 December 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090009687

    Original file (AR20090009687.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 5 April 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of serious offense in that he wrongfully used cocaine x2 (051125-051128 & 060114-060117), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 9 May 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006082

    Original file (AR20090006082.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 14 March 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...