ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015236
However, her DD Form 214 indicates that she was released from active duty training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200 by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. The evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in entry-level status, was released from active duty for training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. Certification Signature Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015237
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 June 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor wrongful use of amphetamines and d-methamphetamines (020405-020422), with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 26 June 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015238
Upon receiveing records, commander stated the Army can't fix issue because Army didn't cause it. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge, the re-entry code, and the characterization of service were proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Issue a new DD Form 214 Colonel,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015239
It indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-27f, NGR 600-200, by reason of unsatisfactory participation with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) Code of " 3." Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-91 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard. Board Discussion, Determination, and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015533
The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service in lieu trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015558
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015565
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 June 2007, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSB) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards, she was diagnosed with congenital scoliosis , and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the condition existed prior to service. The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015569
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived his right to an administrative separation board and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015573
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 12 January 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for being counseled numerous times for substandard performance; received a Summarized Article 15 for disobeying a lawful order (980925); and received a Field Grade Article 15 for driving drunk (981221), with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015575
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 021022 Chapter: 5 AR: 635-200 Reason: Personality Disorder RE: SPD: JFX Unit/Location: HHC, 2-3 IN Bn, Fort Lewis, WA Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 020805, dereliction of duty (020717), reduction to E-4, extra duty for 45 days and restriction for 45 days (FG). His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, by...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015583
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015591
Total Service: 06 Yrs, 6Mos, 20Days DD Form 214 incorrectly show's in item 12a "Date entered AD This Period" as year 1998, month 09, and day 23, based on enlistment contract found in the available record item 12a should read year 1998, month 09, and day 02. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015595
On 26 January 2007, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015596
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015597
Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 2 No change 3 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Issue a new DD Form 214 Colonel, U.S. Army Change Characterization to: President, Army Discharge Review Board Change Reason to: Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015599
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 10 August 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015600
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 15 July 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for failure to report numerous times, disobeyed NCOs numerous times, communicated a threat, dereliction of duty, conspired to commit larceny and committed larceny, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 24...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015601
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015606
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 7 March 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious for wrongful use of cocaine on two separate occasions, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015608
Applicant Name: ????? Hanson believed that I had no use for the Army and pushed for a Field Grade Article 15 and a separation from the Army for the damage to Sgt Shields vehicle. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 November 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for failure to repair on several occasions, forged a sick call...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015909
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board , and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 4 February 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015922
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 26 April 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor having been arrested for wrongful possession of marijuana (000202), with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015924
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 10 May 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious for AWOL (070126-070501) and wrongful use of marijuana, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 17 May 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015928
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 6 July 1995, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015940
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than an honorable discharge, and did submit a statement in his own behalf. On 16 December 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015943
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. While the applicant's misconduct is not condoned, the analyst found that the length and quality of the applicant's service; to include his combat service, and the indepenent documentation submitted by the applicant mitigated the discrediting entries in his service record. Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the Board that the applicants...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016061
The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service. The regulation also directs that commanders will not take action prescribed in this chapter in lieu of disciplinary action; requires that the diagnosis concludes the disorder is so severe that the Soldiers ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired; and states that separation for personality disorder is not appropriate when separation is warranted under chapter 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016063
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Issue a new...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016064
Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue she submitted as to the propriety of her discharge, the analyst determined that the applicants available record of service during the period under review as a U.S. Army Reserve officer is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to her discharge from the Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016067
Applicant Name: Application Receipt Date: 2007/11/08 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 061122 Chapter: 5-11 AR: 635-200 Reason: Failed Medical/Physical/Procurement Standards RE: SPD: JFW Unit/Location: B Co, 232d Medical Training Bn, Fort Sam Houston, TX Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NOne Counseling Records Available: Yes...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016068
Applicant Name: ????? The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, Paragraph 8-26b(3), NGR 600-200, by reason of failure to meet medical procurement standards, with service uncharacterized. For Soldiers ordered to IADT for one continuous period, it terminates 180 days after beginning training.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016070
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 October 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for repeated acts of disrespect toward NCOs and for failure to obey lawful orders multiple times, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016097
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 03 Mos, 00 Days ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 15 February 2008 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016100
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the Applicant II. On 14 June 2006, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the Board that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016102
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5-18, AR 635-200, by reason of physical condition, not a disability with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5-18, AR 635-200, by reason of, Physical Condition, Not A Disability with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016111
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on (date not in file), the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military life, refusal to participate in training, and for lack of motivation, with an uncharacterized discharge. On 16 May 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016121
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 19 January 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016123
Applicant Name: ????? On 17 October 1994, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a general under honorable conditions discharge. By her unsatisfactory performance, the applicant diminished the quality of her service below that meriting a fully honorable characterization of service.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016126
Applicant Name: ????? On 25 March 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Issue a new DD Form 214 Colonel, U.S. Army Change Characterization to: President, Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016132
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 19 April 2007 , the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016348
Applicant Name: ????? On 15 Septemeber 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016415
Applicant Name: ????? On 19 March 2007, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016417
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 June 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for wrongful use of cocaine (020206-020219), wrongful use of amphetamines and d-methamphetamine (030101-030103) and wrongful use of marijuana X 2 (020121-020219 and 021204-030103), with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016419
When you review my records you will see what I have done while I was in the Army. Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 04 Mos, 14 Days ((Includes 88 days of excess leave (070223-070521)) Total Service: 19 Yrs, 07Mos, 17 Days The Applicant re-enlisted multiple times during the period under review (871003-070521) and received a single DD Form 214 covering that period. The DD Form 214 indicates that the Applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016421
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See attached DD Form 293 submitted by the Applicant. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016464
Applicant Name: ????? On 31 March 1997, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the Board that the Applicants characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016468
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 October 1995 , the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor pattern of misconduct: received Field Grade Article 15 for the wrongful use of cocaine, as well as getting counseled for failure to report, disobeying orders, and disturbing the peace after hours with a general under honorable conditions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016528
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 December 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military environment, repeated APFT failure, and for lack of motivation, with an uncharacterized discharge. The applicant waived her right to consult with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016529
On 13 October 2004, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The evidence of record shows the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge. Yes No Counsel: N/A Witnesses/Observers: N/A Exhibits Submitted: N/A VIII.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016533
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: None Exhibits Submitted: None VIII.