ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010076
The regulation also directs that: commanders will not take action prescribed in this chapter in lieu of disciplinary action; requires that the diagnosis concludes the disorder is so severe that the Soldiers ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired; and states that separation for personality disorder is not appropriate when separation is warranted under chapter 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, or 15; Army Regulation 604-10 or Army Regulation 635-40. Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010077
I received only 15 days of restriction because the Company Commander said it was reasonable self-defense. The second article 15 resulted from an incident which took place one month after I was discharged from the hospital. Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 31 August 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (you received a Company...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010078
Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 8 Mos, 7 Days ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010080
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 2 June 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct (failure to adapt), with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010081
Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 980325 Discharge Received: Date: 980417 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial By court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: B Company, 3rd Battalion, 67thy Armor, Fort Hood, TX 76544 Time Lost: AWOL, for a total of 61 days, from (971112-980111). Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010082
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 14 October 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l3, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance (despite numerous counselings, both written and verbal, she continue to show lack of respect to both commissioned and noncommissioned officers, she repeatedly failed to follow instruction from supervisors and accept responsibility for her actions),...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010083
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 03Mos, 02Days ????? The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 20 July 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010084
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 03 Mos, 20 Days ????? On 14 March 2004, the separation authority approved the applicant's request to waive his right to an administrative separation board, and directed that the applicant be separated with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 31 July 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010086
Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKK (i.e., misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs.) That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, Paragraph 12c(2) by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010087
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010089
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 14 June 2006, the separation authority approved the findings and recommendation of the administrative separation board, waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The Board does not condone the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010206
Current ENL Service: 3 Yrs, 4 Mos, 16 Days ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: Secretarial Authority under Chapter 5, AR 635-200 Other: None RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None XI.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010208
Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKA (i.e., misconduct-pattern of misconduct.) That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, Paragraph 12b by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E....
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010209
However, on 9 August 2005, AHRC-PAP-E550 Orders D-08-590224, DA, US Army Human Resources Command, 1 Reserve Way, St. Louis, Missouri, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve/Active Guard Reserve, effective date: 12 August 2005, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. However, on 9 August 2005, AHRC-PAP-E550 Orders D-08-590224, DA, US Army Human Resources Command, 1 Reserve Way, St. Louis, Missouri, discharged the applicant from the United States Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010210
Current ENL Service: 1 Yrs, 6 Mos, 16 Days ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010211
Application Receipt Date: 060720 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Army Regulation 635-200, provides that a soldier is in an entry-level status if the soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicants record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010212
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct with an uncharacterized separation of service. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicants record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E....
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010213
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: Secretarial Authority under Chapter 5, AR 635-200. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010214
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010215
Evidence of record shows that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance with an honorable characterization of service. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the narrative reason on the DD Form 214 to current standards Physical Standards, with a corresponding separation (SPD) code of "LFT." Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010216
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue he submitted, the analyst found several mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the characterization of service to general under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010217
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 03 Mos, 04 Days ????? That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c (1) by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense/AWOL, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 10 May 2007 Lieutenant...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010218
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 16 October 2001, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010219
Current ENL Service: 3 Yrs, 9 Mos, 29 Days The applicant net active service this period on the DD Form 214, item 12c is incorrect; should be: 3 Years, 9 Months, 29 Days, the applicant was AWOL, for 14 days, however, the DD Form 214 item 29 (Time Lost) does not reflect this period of AWOL. Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 12 April 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010364
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 27 July 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense/abuse of illegal drugs, (you wrongfully used cocaine and you absented yourself from your unit from 5 May 2005 to 14 June 2005), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010365
Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 7 Mos, 9 Days ????? The unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol or other drug abuse rehabilitation failure, with an honorable discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 20 July 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010368
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 03Mos, 29Days ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 20 July 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010369
Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 1 Mos, 13 Days ????? Army policy states that a general discharge, under honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate, but an honorable discharge may be granted in meritorious cases. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 1 August 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010370
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 20 February 1995, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance (receiving two Article 15's, several counseling statements for failing to report to duty on time and leaving her appointed place of duty and dereliction of duty), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010372
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 20 July...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010373
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 9 July 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010374
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 10Mos, 22Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 8 November 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (numerous instances of misconduct, to include assault on his wife and child on 19 April 2001, rendering false official statements to his (1SG) when asked about purchasing alcohol for another Soldier...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010377
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 02Mos, 01Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 30 August 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpatterns of misconduct (on 18 August 1999, received a company grade Article 15, for violation of a lawful order by consuming alcohol while on mission status, failure to report and violation of a lawful command, received a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010379
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 04 Mos, 27 Days ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 14 March 2005, the separation authority wavied further rehabilitative requirements and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010383
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 10 May 2007 Lieutenant...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010385
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service-in lieu of court-martial with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010386
Current ENL Service: 04 Yrs, 00 Mos, 06 Days ????? On 10 May 2005, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) accepted the applicant's resignation, approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board, and directed that the applicant be separated from the Army with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, the applicant's DD Form 214 shows that upon separation from the service, she received an honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010387
Application Receipt Date: 060725 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. However, the record does contain a properly constituted NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service in the New York Army National Guard), which the applicant was unavailable for signature. The Analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicants record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010390
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 3 August 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense (you were drunk on duty), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010392
Current ENL Service: 0 Yrs, 10 Mos, 11 Days ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 11 March 2005, the separation authority approved the findings and recommendations of the board and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010448
Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-178 govern procedures for the administrative separation of enlisted personnel of the Army National Guard and Army Reserve. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, Paragraph 8-26e (2) (a), NGR 600-200, by reason of acts or patterns of misconduct with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions and the analyst presumed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010449
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 19 January 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (failure to report to your appointed place of duty at the time prescribed, disobey and disrespect towards a commissioned officer, and the above behavior resulted in you receiving two Company Grade Article 15's, and several negative counseling...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010450
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010451
Current ENL Service: 0 Yrs, 8 Mos, 3 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 14 April 1995, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense/abuse of illegal drugs (you were found to have illegal drugs and drug paraphernalia in your barracks room), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010452
On 6 May 1999, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010453
Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-178 govern procedures for the administrative separation of enlisted personnel of the Army National Guard and Army Reserve. Therefore, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remains both proper and equitable. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 11...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010454
Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 051031 Discharge Received: Date: 051221 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: 82nd Replacement Detachment, 82nd Paratrooper Support Battalion, 82nd Airborne Division, Fort Bragg, NC 28310 Time Lost: AWOL, for a total of 190 days from (13 April 2005 to 19 October 2005). Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010455
A Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when his separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010456
On 30 April 2003, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010457
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 21 July 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 12-1, AR135-178, and paragraph 8-26e (2), NGR 600-200, by reason of misconductacts or patterns of misconduct (violation of NGR 600-5, paragraphs 6-5(c)1, inappropriate professional and person conduct and 6-5(c)2, moral or professional dereliction, as substantiated in the AR 15-6 investigation report of findings...