ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010458
Current ENL Service: 3 Yrs, 7 Mos, 0 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 14 January 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (you were taken to the Korean National Police Station following a rock-throwing incident in Anjong-Ri, you were counseled for failing to repair x 2, received a CID Report establishing probable cause to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010459
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 11 Mos, 20 Days ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh, and as a result it is inequitable. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: None Other:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010460
Paragraph 5-17 provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, that interferes with assignment to or performance of duty. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010461
Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JFW (i.e., failed medical/physical procurement standards) with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3. b. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief. Certification...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010462
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 31 July 2007 Lieutenant...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010463
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 08 Mos, 19 Days ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010468
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 February 2006, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the condition existed prior to service. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010471
On 14 December 2005, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 1 August...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010474
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The Board determined that the applicant's overall length and quality of service, to include his combat service, mitigated the discrediting entries in his service record. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010475
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was release from active duty training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200 by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. The evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in entry-level status, was released from active duty for training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. The characterization of service for Soldiers...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010476
Application Receipt Date: 060728 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 17 December 2001, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010477
Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct with an uncharacterized separation of service. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when her separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry-level status. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010478
Current ENL Service: 1 Yrs, 5 Mos, 12 Days ????? The regulation also directs that: commanders will not take action prescribed in this chapter in lieu of disciplinary action; requires that the diagnosis concludes the disorder is so severe that the Soldiers ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired; and states that separation for personality disorder is not appropriate when separation is warranted under chapter 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, or 15; Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010482
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did submit a statement in his own behalf which was not found in the available record. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: Secretarial Authority under the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010487
Application Receipt Date: 060728 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 00Mos, 17Days ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010488
Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony, and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh, and as a result it is now inequitable. The Board determined that the applicant's overall length and quality of service to include his combat service, and his post service...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010490
On 30 September 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents he submitted, the analyst recommend that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010495
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. However, the applicants DD Form 214 indicates that she was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-13, AR 635-200 by reason of personality disorder, with an honorable characterization of service. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010503
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 07Mos, 22Days ????? The evidence of record shows that on 9 September 2004, DA, HQ, 70th Regional Readiness Command, Seattle, Washington, Orders 04-253-00010, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective date: 9 September 2004, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010545
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 11Mos, 28Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 21 October 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense (receiving a company grade Article 15 on 9 September 2002 for willful disobedience to a senior noncommissioned officer, and receiving a field grade Article 15 on 7 October 2002 for willful...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010640
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 23 May 2005, the separation authority approved the findings and recommendations of the administartive separation board, and directed that the applicant be seprated from the service with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, Paragraph 12b by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct, with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010896
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 04 Mos, 13 Days ????? A Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 1 August 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010974
Application Receipt Date: 060628 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010975
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an honorable discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the narrative reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it. Certification...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010978
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293. Therefore, it is recommended to the Board that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 21 June 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011345
The applicant was confined by military authority for 114 days, from (031125-040318), as a result of special court-martial sentence. Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 01 Mos, 07 Days ????? Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 22 August 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011435
Application Receipt Date: 060811 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 31 July 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011459
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 03 Mos, 20 Days ????? His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph-12c, AR 635-200 by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions and a reentry eligibility (RE) code of" 3." That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011476
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011477
Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 8 Mos, 20 Days ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011495
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 08 Mos, 05 Days ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 21 October 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011497
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 2 October 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (wrongful use of marijuana, failed to be at his appointed place of duty several times, made a false official statement, willfully disobeyed a lawful order, and in debt to AAFES), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The applicant...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011498
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011503
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. On 3 August 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 1 August 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011507
The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 18 October 1991, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011514
That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 3, AR 600-8-24, by reason of unqualified resignation (in lieu of Article 15), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the term of service under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011515
However, the evidence of record shows that on 31 August 2004, Orders 04-244-00022, DA, HQ, 81st Regional Readiness Command, Birmingham, Alabama, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective date: 31 August 2004, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E....
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011517
Application Receipt Date: 080801 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. It indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 8-26(o), NGR 600-200, by reason of unsatisfactory participation with a characterization of service of honorable and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of "1." Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-91 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011518
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 15 October 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (receiving a field grade Article 15 for assaulting a (SSG) on 9 September 2001, and being counseled on numerous occausions and failing to repond to the counseling), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 9 January 2002, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011519
Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 030807 Discharge Received: Date: 030827 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Troop B, 5th Battalion, 15th Cavalry, Fort Knox, KY 40121-5238 Time Lost: AWOL, for a total of 44 days, from (030620-030803). On 13 August 2003, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011520
Current ENL Service: 04 Yrs, 00 Mos, 19 Days ????? The unit and intermediate commanders recommended approval of the request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board does not condone the applicants...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011525
Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 2 Mos, 5 Days ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 1 August 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011526
Current ENL Service: 05 Yrs, 05 Mos, 00 Days ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011528
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 with nineteen (19) attachments. Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 960301 Discharge Received: Date: 960619 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Company A, 1st Battalion, 9th Cavalry Division, Fort Hood, TX 76545-5123 Time Lost: AWOL, for a total of 71 days from (15 November 1995 to 24 January 1996. Certification...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011529
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 1 September 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (you violated Article 87 of the UCMJ, by missing movement through neglect, by negligently not providing proper care for your children, and violated Article 86 of the UCMJ, by failing to report to your appointed placed of duty at the prescribed time)...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011530
Application Receipt Date: 060802 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 02 Mos, 27 Days ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011531
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293 and supporting document. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service-in lieu of court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011532
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 11 May 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense/abuse of illegal drugs (disobeying lawful orders, breaking restriction, failing to repair and your use of cocaine), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011534
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 08 Mos, 06 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record reveals that on 6 October 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood (her inability to participate in field exercises or perform special duties, non-availability for worldwide assignment or deployment to the needs of the Army due to her parental responsibilities and inability to provide a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011535
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 14 February 1996, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (specifically failure to obey a lawful order, AWOL, and failure to repair on multiple occasions), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of...