ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015469
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that Paragraph 1-19, AR 635-200, details the appropriate separation authority based on the type of discharge possible and the procedure used for separation. The separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Decision The discharge was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015472
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015476
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 31 January 1997, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (he received a Company Grade Article 15 for violation of Article 91, numerous derogatory counseling statements and has peformed below the standards of this unit), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015478
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 01 Mos, 29 Days Item 12c on DD Form 214, net active service this period is incorrect, should read 01 Yrs, 01 Mos, 29 Days. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 28 November 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015482
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 20 January 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (disrespected a noncommissioned officer X 3, on or about (040416, 050128, 050503); disrespected and disobeyed a noncommissioned officer on or about (050128); left her place of duty, and disobeyed a noncommissioned officer on or about (051011)), with...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015489
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015667
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293, with attachments. The unit commander's recommendation to separate the applicant with an under other than honorable conditions discharge and the separation approving authority documentation directing the applicant's discharge from the Army is not a part of the available records and the analyst presumed Government regularity in the discharge process. Certification Signature and Date Approval...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015813
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015815
That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, AR 635-200, paragraph 5-11, by reason of failed medical/ physical/ procurement standards, with an uncharacterized separation of service . Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the narrative...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015823
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant stated, "I would like to change the reenlistment code R4 to R3 so I could reenlist and serve my country. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 23 October 1997 the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015830
There is no place in the army for disrespect to superiors, but my actions did not warrant a General discharge after serving over 4 years and nearly completing my enlistment. Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 6 April 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (Article 15 for disrespecting and assaulting a superior commissioned officer,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016041
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 16 August 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (you received a Field Grade Article 15 for failure to report, disobeying a lawful order from a noncommissioned officer, failure to pay just debt, disrespectful towards a superior commissioned officer, disobeyed a command, used provoking speeches and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016047
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 2 November...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016050
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016053
Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-91 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard. The applicants record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the State of Michigan Army National Guard. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E....
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016054
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 04 Mos, 25 Days ????? The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt. Yes No Counsel: Yes [redacted] Witnesses/Observers: No Exhibits Submitted: The applicant submitted several additional documents in support of his personal appearance hearing.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016203
This document indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-26e, NGR 600-200, by reason of acts or patterns of misconduct with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of "3." c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available military records for the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents he submitted, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016207
Current ENL Service: 1 Yrs, 1 Mos, 27 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 21 December 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense/abuse of illegal drugs (on 17 September 2004 you tested positive for marijuana, for which you received a Field Grade Article 15), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 5...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016210
Current ENL Service: 4 Yrs, 8 Mos, 6 Days ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016218
The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to fully honorable and a change to the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 23...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016219
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he Request that my Discharge be upgraded to a General Discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016234
On 15 December 2005, the separation authority disapproved the applicant's conditional waiver of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him being retained in the United States Army. On 24 February 2006, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016235
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 8 December 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for use of illegal drugs-cocaine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016236
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 10 December 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for having received a Field Grade Article 15 for wrongful use of cocaine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 18 December 2004, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016239
On 30 January 2006, the separation authority approved the discharge with characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016240
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in her own behalf. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016241
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and documents submitted by the Applicant. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016242
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016278
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 1 December 2005, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 27 December...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016333
Application Receipt Date: 061127 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: XI. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 21 December 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016442
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 8 July 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for using cocaine (040731-040803), AWOL x 2 (040731-040803 and 040206-040211), and operating a motor vehicle while impaired (020701), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 22 July 2005 the applicant consulted with legal counsel. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016450
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016533
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 22 November 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-for wrongfully using marijuana and AWOL between 5 October 2004 and 7 October 2004, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 18 January 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016534
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016535
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant's military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issues he submitted, the analyst recommends that the applicant's characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the Board that the applicant's characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. Yes...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016536
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016541
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 14 October 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct/commission of a serious offense (violation of Brigade Policy Memorandum # 17, 2 times, drinking under age, failure to repair x 4, disobeyed a non-commissioned officer and making a false statement), with a general, under honorable conditions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016565
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 August 2006, the applicant was charged with one specification of leaving his appointed place of duty on or about 3 August 2006; two specifications of willfully disobeying a lawful order from a superior noncommissioned officer on or about 29 July 2006 and on or about 3 August 2006; two specifications of disrespect towards superior noncommissioned officers, on or about 29 July 2006 and on or about 3 August 2006. The analyst...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016762
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 12 June 1997, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (received a Field Grade Article 15 for larceny and breaking restriction, a Battery Grade Article 15 for dereliction of duty, and a Summarized Article 15 for disobeying a written order. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016763
Chapter 3, Section IV, establishes policy and procedures for separating members with a dishonorable or bad conduct discharge; and provides that a soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial; and that the appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016780
Application Receipt Date: 061207 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 04 Mos, 16 Days ????? On 30 July 2004, the separation authority approved the discharge and directed that the applicant be separated from the Army with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016796
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by an Administrative Separation Board, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. Records also show that the applicant was processed for discharge using Chapter 12, AR 135-178, however his DD Form 214 shows the "Separation Authority" as AR 635-200, Paragraph 14-12c (2), with a "Separation Code" of JKK, a "Reentry Code of "3", and the "Narrative Reason for...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016798
Yes No Counsel: No Witnesses/Observers: No Exhibits Submitted: None VIII. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to fully honorable and a change to the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 21 May 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016811
The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. Army regulation states that when the sole basis for separation is homosexuality, a discharge under other than honorable conditions may be issued only if such characterization is warranted in accordance with chapter 3, section III, and if there is a finding that during the current term of service the Soldier attempted, solicited, or committed a homosexual...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060017132
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents. Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 08 Mos, 07 Days ????? His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial court-martial, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060017137
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 05 Mos, 06 Days ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh, and as a result it is inequitable. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060017139
On 24 February 1999, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060017153
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant's available military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issues he submitted, the analyst recommends that the applicant's characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service in lieu of court-martial, with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060017185
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 7 July 1995, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct, with an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a soldiers service will be uncharacterized when her separation is initiated while the soldier is in entry level status. Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060017195
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293 and supporting documents. Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 05Mos, 20Days The applicant was retained beyond his ETS date of (910622), at the convence of the government. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service-in lieu of court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.