ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120001362
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 100128 Discharge Received: Date: 100211 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: A Co, 64th Bde Spt Bn, Fort Carson, CO Time Lost: 62 days total. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120001367
When he returned from Iraq, his mood changed and he became a different person who made a few mistakes. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct (serious offense), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: Spouse Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated 27 January 2011; DD Form 214 for service under current review; VA...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120001372
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 April 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of commission of a serious offense for being convicted of using a controlled substance, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 18 April 2001, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120001375
Applicant Name: ????? On 16 May 2002, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The applicant also contends his misconduct was a single incident.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120001401
Applicant Name: ????? The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the applicant produced any evidence, to support a change to the characterization of service granted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120001457
Applicant Name: ????? On 12 March 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct Drug Abuse and the separation code is "JKK" with a reentry eligibility (RE) code "4."
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120001709
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214, indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-drug abuse, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The burden of proof remains with the applicant to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120001716
On or about 30 June 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies. There are many Soldiers with the same condition that complete their service successfully.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120001761
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for wrongfully using spice, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120002539
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he served in combat during a prior period of service and suffered from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and major depression. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 February 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for lack...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120002595
Applicant Name: ????? On 5 April 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, in review of the applicant's entire service record, the analyst found that this medical condition did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120002846
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows on 22 June 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of commission of a commission of a serious offense for receiving a Company Grade Article for 15 being disrespectful in language toward a superior noncommissioned officer (100106); receiving a vacation of suspension for assaulting a military policeman (100316); receiving a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120002916
Applicant Name: ????? On 24 August 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120003159
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, "I have documented service connected PTSD. His DD Form 214, indicates he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, AR 635-200, by reason of personality disorder, with an honorable characterization of service. The DD Form 214, shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, AR 635-200, by reason of personality disorder, with a fully honorable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120003319
Applicant Name: ????? On 23 January 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board per his pre-trial agreement, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 12 February 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120003345
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant contends that because she was sexually assaulted on active duty and rated as 100% disabled by the Department of Veterans Affairs for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder her discharge should be upgraded to honorable. However, in review of the applicant's entire service record, the analyst found that this medical condition did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120004312
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant, states in effect, that his Purple Heart award is not listed on his DD Form 214 and that he is requesting an upgrade of his discharge to honorable in order to use his educational benefits. On 19 December 2011, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120006234
Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, in review of the applicant's entire service record, the analyst found that this medical condition the applicant is claiming did not overcome the reason for discharge and the characterization of service granted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120007306
Applicant Name: ????? On 16 November 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and submitted a statement in his own behalf. Additionally, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120008098
On 22 February 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant's separation from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200, also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Entry Level Performance...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120017639
On 20 January 2011, the applicant's unit commander notified him he was initiating action which could result in separation from the Army with a general discharge under honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 14, for patterns of misconduct: possession of a vehicle which had been reported stolen, violation of two lawful orders given by his company commander, on divers occasions failing to go to his appointed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120022819
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). The applicant states he was awarded the MSM in 1990 for his meritorious service on the occasion of his retirement from active duty, but the award was omitted from his DD Form 214. The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review.