ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120023020
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 16 June 1978, a board of officers convened to consider the applicant for administrative discharge based on his civil conviction. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120023021
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his foreign service in Iraq during his first deployment. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Iraq Campaign Medal is awarded to members who have served in direct support of OIF. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 as follows: * deleting the current entry...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120023024
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120023025
She was not married to the FSM at the time when the DD Form 1883 was to be submitted; therefore, she had no control over the paperwork. Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120023030
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. He was told he would be trained in MOS 91B and could later request training in MOS 91T. On 1 February 1977, the separation authority approved his discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, and directed he receive an Under Other than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120023034
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 August 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120023034 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Notwithstanding the applicant's contention and his sincerity, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120023035
Following counseling, the applicant submitted a voluntary written request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial. In his request for discharge, he indicated he understood that by requesting discharge, he was admitting guilt to the charge against him or of a lesser included offense that also authorized the imposition of a discharge under other than...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120023037
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests her social security number (SSN) on all of her military records be changed to the new SSN she was issued on 21 November 2012 by the Social Security Administration. _______ _ X ______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120023038
The applicant provides: * a self-authored memoir of what occurred before, during, and after his Saigon trip * a statement of support from another individual * Congressional correspondence * DD Form 214 * Honorable Discharge Certificate * Discharge orders from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) * Letter of appreciation * Court Order for change of name * Statement in support of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) claim * Letter from the National Personnel Records Center CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120023044
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 July 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120023044 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. This form further shows his character of service as under other than honorable conditions and he was issued a Bad Conduct Discharge Certificate. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterized the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120023047
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his social security number (SSN) as "xxx-xx-4xxx." All of his service personnel records show his SSN as "xxx-xx-5xxx." However, the evidence of record shows the SSN of "xxx-xx-5xxx" was used exclusively when he enlisted in the USAR and RA, when he was released from active duty, and when he was discharged from the USAR.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120023048
There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120023050
The last time he returned he was given orders not to leave the boat. A Memorandum for Record, dated 10 December 1980, states the following facts: a. the applicant had enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 January 1975 for 3 years; b. he had 33 days time lost prior to being reported AWOL on 6 August 1977; c. he was dropped from the rolls of the Army on 3 September 1977; d. there was no report of his return to military control; e. there were no charge sheets in his personnel records; f. the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120023052
The applicant provides: * An internet printout titled "The 23rd Infantry Regiment Korean War Years" * Statement from a former unit member * DD Form 214, ending on 22 April 1953 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), ending on 1 November 1988 * Special Orders (SO) Number 201, Combat Infantryman Badge * Enlisted Roster, dated 31 July 1952, K Company, 23rd Infantry CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's complete military records are not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120023056
The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 14 February 1986, the separation authority, a major general, approved the applicant's request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, and directed the issuance of an under other than honorable conditions discharge and reduction to pay grade E-1. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120023057
The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged with a BCD on 17 May 1994. a. Thus, the applicant's contention that his second period of service was honorable is not supported by the evidence of record. ___________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120024493
The applicant requests that he be granted an exception to policy (ETP) for tuition reimbursement under the Federal Tuition Assistance (FTA) Program. Since the applicant tried to correct the issue 30 days into the school year, there were no funds "obligated" on the DA Form 2171 (Request for Tuition Assistance Army Continuing Education System) contract to make payment. If the tuition assistance Request Authorization is approved the Soldier will be notified by email.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120024627
The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect his correct Social Security Number (SSN), Date of Birth (DOB) and the date of his release from active duty (REFRAD). At the time of his induction, his SSN was recorded in his records as having the last four digits of 7820 and his DOB was recorded as 19 August. His records show the last four of his SSN as 7820 and were incorrectly reflected as 7280,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000018
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000050
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The analyst noted the applicant's issue about his desire to upgrade his discharge for the purpose of being about to join the Army National Guard or Army Reserves.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000068
Chapter 3, Section IV, establishes policy and procedures for separating members with a dishonorable or bad conduct discharge; and provides that a Soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial; and that the appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed. After a thorough review of the applicants records and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000075
He contends his misconduct was a single incident during 53 months of service with no other adverse action. On 21 May 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant contends his misconduct was a single incident during 53 months of service with no other adverse action.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000078
Applicant Name: ????? On 16 February 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waive consideration of my case by an administrative separation board, contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000080
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 30 October 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor wrongfully using marijuana (080824-080923) and sleeping on post as a sentinel in Iraq (080526), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 6 November 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000083
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 16 August 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for showing a pattern of misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000088
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 15 February 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for displaying a lack of motivation self-discipline and continued unsatisfactory performance, refusing to train multiple times, disobeying a direct order, being a training distracter, failing to adapt to military standards and should not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000089
Applicant Name: ????? The evidence of record shows that the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (serious offense)", and the separation code is "JKQ."
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000092
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 10 October 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for violating a unit general order, multiple offenses of failing to report, disobeying noncommissioned officers, and showing disrespect towards commissioned officers, with a general, under honorable conditions...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000276
Applicant Name: ????? On 11 February 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", the separation code is "JKK", and the reentry code is "RE 4".
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000338
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 23 August 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct,(serious offense), for her arrest for aggravated assault (101008) and arrest for disorderly conduct and possession of alcohol by a minor (110728), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000362
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 January 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason pattern of misconduct for, failing to report, disobeying a lawful order and disrespecting a noncommissioned officer, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000381
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states: "I am a mother now and would like to be able to get the benefits I could get if I had an honorable discharge, like medical. The unit commander recommended approval of the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The analyst noted the applicant's issue about her current characterization of service having an effect on her ability to find a good job later.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000382
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review, the documents, and the issues he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Accordingly, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000386
Applicant Name: ????? On 26 August 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000391
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 December 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (drug abuse) for, wrongful use of marijuana between on or about (090611-090710), with a general, under honorable conditions. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000406
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he served a total of 6 years 8 months and 17 days as an infantry Soldier. The evidence of record shows that the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Furthermore, the analyst acknowledges the applicant's in service accomplishments as stated in his application.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000424
Applicant Name: ????? The evidence of record shows that the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions b. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000490
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, through his counsel that the discharge he received is too harsh, he requests clemency in the form of an upgrade of his discharge to general, under honorable conditions and a change to the reason for the discharge as well. In fact, the applicants special-court martial adjudged a bad conduct-discharge that was properly adjudged as affirmed by the US Army Court of Criminal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000495
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The applicants record does not contain the DD Form 458 (Charge Sheet), his request in writing for discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial, or the unit commander's documentation recommending approval of the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge, and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process. The DD Form 214, indicates the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000641
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000751
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214, indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13-2f, AR 635-200, by reason of physical standards, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: ?????
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000811
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 2 March 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for disrepecting a Field Grade Officer, being derelict in the performance of his duties, disrespecting a noncommissioned officer, and for leaving his appointed place of duty, with a honorable discharge. On 28 March 2007, the separation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000883
Applicant Name: ????? On 19 December 2000, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000887
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 110526 Discharge Received: Date: 110715 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: HHC, 12th CAB, Ansbach, Germany Time Lost: AWOL for 67 days (110211-110419), apprehended. The unit commander recommended approval of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 21 June 2011, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000916
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct (drug abuse), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct (drug abuse), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120001077
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that she is requesting an upgrade of her discharge due to an injustice and inequity in her discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available military records, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicants discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120001080
Applicant Name: ????? On 17 December 2010, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board, and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The record shows that on 17 December 2010, the separation approving authority (GCMCA) indicated in his memorandum that in the foregoing board action pertaining to the applicant, after careful consideration of her case, the findings and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120001161
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The analyst did note the applicant's request for a change to the narrative reason for separation on his DD Form 214, block 28 and found that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120001175
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 6 April 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for wrongfully using a controlled substance, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Moreover, the analyst acknowledges the applicant's in service accomplishments and his combat...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120001348
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he requests his discharge be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions with an RE code of "3" so he can rejoin the military. The analyst also noted the applicant's request to change his RE code; however, Soldiers being processed for separation are assigned reentry (RE) codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.