ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026600
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. When separation for unsuitability was warranted an honorable or general discharge was issued as determined by the separation authority based upon the individual's entire record. After a review of the applicant's record of service, it is evident that the quality of service did not meet the standards of acceptable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026602
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It states for Item 14, list formal in-service (full-time attendance) training courses successfully completed during the period of service covered by the DD Form 214. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026604
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 August 1974. _____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026612
The applicant's records show he was commissioned as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army in the rank of second lieutenant on 13 May 1979. Item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) of his DD Form 214 shows he entered active duty on 13 June 1983. The evidence of record clearly shows he entered active duty on 13 June 1983.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026614
His military personnel record shows he was born on 12 August 1969 and enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 February 1987 at the age of 17 years, 6 months, and 1 day. Service of Soldiers separated because of unsatisfactory performance under this regulation will be characterized as honorable or under honorable conditions. Evidence shows his separation was based upon unsatisfactory performance as a Soldier, which included numerous counseling statements and NJP.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026619
He further states, in effect, the applicant is entitled to CRSC because he has received a 10 percent (%) disability rating percentage from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for the injury to his toe, which was incurred when an ammunition trailer, an "instrumentality of war," fell on his foot. Counsel provides a DA Form 8-275-3 that shows the applicant was admitted to the 93d Evacuation Hospital at 1530 hours on 6 February 1970 for a laceration to his left great toe. Department of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026621
A newspaper article states the attack was "enemy fire" and this proves he was in combat. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20100009656 on 9 September 2010. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The newspaper article does not show and the applicant has not provided any evidence that he was at the Officers' Club when it came...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026624
It is in the interest of justice to consider this case because: * It involves long-term institutional discrimination * It requires promotion and assignment data and statistics for proof * The National Guard Bureau (NGB) was often unresponsive to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and misdirected and/or delayed replies for many months * Key witness testimony was delayed * Counsel was delayed due to his own disability * The State Senator has concerns about discrimination within the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026625
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026627
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 July 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100026627 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's record shows that on 10 August 2000 he was notified that he had been considered for promotion to major for the second time and he had not been selected. It is presumed that when the applicant was promoted to major he was notified of his selection at the last address he furnished the Army.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026628
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 February 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100026628 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026630
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 February 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100026630 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026631
The applicant's DD Form 214 shows: a. on 18 February 2005, she was released from active duty; b. she completed 1 year, 1 month, and 15 days of creditable active duty service during this period; c. she served overseas for a total of 11 months and 19 days; d. she was awarded the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal; and e. she served in Kuwait and Iraq from 3 February 2004 to 21 January 2005. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Iraq Campaign Medal is awarded to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026632
There is no evidence in the applicant's military record that shows he was present or one the more than 40 Americans injured during a bombing at the La Belle discotheque in 1986. His service medical record is not available for review. The assessment, dated 5 October 2010, stated his problems started in 1986 when he was injured at the bombing at LaBelle Discotheque in Berlin.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026633
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. _______ _ x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100026633 3 ARMY...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026635
Based on the evidence of record, the applicant served in Operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm during the period 1 September 1990 to 25 March 1991. While the applicant did not specifically request correction to his DD Form 214 to show his foreign service tour in Kuwait/Saudi Arabia, it would be appropriate to do so based on his foreign service tour recorded on the DMDC Desert Shield/Storm Data Base. Based on the applicant's service in Saudi Arabia in support of Operations Desert Shield and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026636
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. The applicant provides his DD Form 214, effective 19 December 2010, and Army Good Conduct Medal orders, dated 22 October 2006. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 13 of his DD Form 214, effective 19 December 2010, the Army Good Conduct Medal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026639
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Purple Heart and that an Army Commendation Medal Certificate be issued to him. He also provides an award certificate, dated 12 August 2004, wherein it shows Permanent Order Number 04-225-111 issued by 167th Corps Support Group awarded Sergeant P____ S____ the Army Commendation Medal for exceptionally meritorious service in support of OIF for the period 13 November...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026640
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 January 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100026640 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states she was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days she earned and was entitled to. In view of the above, the applicant's records should be corrected to show she is entitled to receive 62 days of PDMRA with all appropriate allowances to be used within a 12-month period commencing on the date of this Board's notice.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026641
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he served on active duty from 30 October 1962 through 23 October 1965 and award of the Legion of Merit (LOM). The evidence of record confirms he served on active duty from 30 October 1962 through 21 October 1965 for a period of 2 years, 11 months, and 23 days for which he issued a DD...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026645
On 18 June 1968, he was discharged from active duty in pay grade E-1 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212, for unfitness, with a UD. On 24 May 1977, the ADRB upgraded his UD to a general discharge under the Department of Defense (DOD) Special Discharge Review Program (SDRP). Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 3-7a, states an honorable discharge is a separation with honor.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026646
The applicant states: * He was to receive the Army Good Conduct Medal from Headquarters and Company A, 709th Maintenance Battalion, 9th Infantry for his year of service with them during the Vietnam War * He participated in the Akron, Coronado, Emporia, and Great Bend campaigns in Vietnam from June 1967 through March 1968 * The 9th Infantry Division was heavily involved in the Tet offensive during February and March 1968 * It was a hectic time in the jungle and delta * They were told their...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026648
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he received three awards of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) and to show his service in Korea with Company B, 2d Supply and Transport Battalion, 2d Infantry Division. The applicant's record contains two orders awarding him the AAM and his DD Form 214 shows he was twice awarded the AAM. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026651
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant was separated on temporary records that are still the only ones available for review. On 17 February 1978 and 6 November 1980, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's requests to upgrade his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026652
His record shows he served in Republic of Vietnam from 21 May 1967 through on or about 16 May 1968 and was awarded the CIB during this period of service. Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026653
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Decorations and Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows his unit in Vietnam was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation during his period of assignment. As a result, the Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026658
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was discharged from active duty on 15 August 1985 instead of 1984. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026661
The applicant states that he served on the Army ship Corpus Christi Bay in Vietnam for 9 months and his DD Form 214 does not reflect any service in Vietnam. His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD reflects no foreign service or service in Vietnam. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to establish the dates he served in Vietnam there is no basis to grant the applicants request at this time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026672
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 DECEMBER 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100026672 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026674
The applicant requests his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 January 1996 be corrected to show his two tours of duty in Korea. His record does contain the DD Form 214 for the period 31 July 1975 to 7 December 1978 requested by the applicant. The evidence confirms he served two tours of duty in Korea, of which 1 year, 2 months, and 15 days were covered by his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 January 1996.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026676
When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. The applicant contends that his under other than honorable conditions discharge should be upgraded because he was young and did not know any better. __________X_________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026677
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 February 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100026677 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states she was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days she earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026678
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), for the period ending on 28 February 1978 to show the: * Army Commendation Medal (1st Oak Leaf Cluster) * Meritorious Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal 2. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026680
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 February 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100026680 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states she was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days she earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026682
The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026686
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026688
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 February 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100026688 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states she was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days she earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026693
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests transfer of his DA Form 67-9 (Officer Evaluation Report (OER)) for the period 21 May 2006 through 31 October 2006 to the restricted portion of his official military personnel file (OMPF). The applicant provides a memorandum for record from the investigating officer; the OER in question; a memorandum, subject: Notification of Potential Adverse Administrative Action; extracts...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026694
The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026697
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD) to an under other than honorable conditions discharge. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026702
The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026703
The applicant requests that his discharge be upgraded. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel: a. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a UD was normally considered appropriate at the time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026705
The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026706
The applicant requests that his date or rank (DOR) for captain (CPT) be adjusted from 24 September 2007 to 28 March 2007, the date he became eligible for promotion. The official stated the applicant's State promotion occurred on 19 July 2007 and he received Federal recognition on 27 September 2007 [sic]. The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to 1LT on 28 March 2005.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026707
Item 25 (Separation Authority) of his original DD Form 214 shows the entry "Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(1)." Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table, dated 8 September 2005, shows that when the SPD code is "JFF," the Department of the Army directive authorizing the separation program or specific...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026708
The applicant states she was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days she earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026709
She states when she extended her enlistment on 27 February 2009 she was eligible for a $15,000 critical skill enlistment bonus, but the bonus number was never requested via iMARC by the reenlisting officer or the Montana Army National Guard (MTARNG) Incentive Manager. The evidence of record shows the applicant executed a contract extending her enlistment in the MTARNG. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026710
On 10 January 1962, by personnel action, the applicant requested release from active duty, if eligible, based on erroneous order to active duty from the Standby Reserve. There is no evidence he served on active duty between the date he was released from active duty on 20 February 1962 and the date he was ultimately discharged from the USAR on 31 May 1964 upon completion of his military service obligation. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026711
The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026713
The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.