Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026612
Original file (20100026612.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  17 May 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100026612 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 12 June 1986 to show he entered active duty on 13 May 1979, the date of his commissioning from the Tuskegee Institute.

2.  The applicant states the absence of this information on his DD Form 214 is denying his children educational benefits to which they are entitled.  In a self-authored statement, he further states:

	a.  He was commissioned in 1979, but he was given an educational delay [from entering active duty] for the purpose of attending law school.

	b.  The reason he is requesting correction of his DD Form 214 is because his child is being denied benefits provided to other children whose parents were commissioned in 1979, just like he was, but who did not receive an educational delay.

	c.  The State of Alabama has thus far denied his entitlement for his children, because his DD Form 214 reflects his initial entry into the Army as 1983, as opposed to 1979 when he was commissioned.

	d.  If credited with the 4 years and 1 month of inactive service, his DD Form 214 would show he entered active duty in 1979 as an Alabama resident.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* letter, U.S. Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center, dated 23 May 1980
* letter, U.S. Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center, dated 6 October 1980
* letter, U.S. Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center, dated 17 June 1982
* form letter, Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center, dated September 1981
* DA Form 2496 (Disposition Form), dated 26 May 1983
* photocopy of a "While You Were Out" message slip, undated
* photocopy of an envelope addressed to the applicant from the Macon County Board of Registrars
* photocopy of an unidentified registration document citing the applicant's address as the Tuskegee Institute, AL
* three third-party letters of support

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he was commissioned as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army in the rank of second lieutenant on 13 May 1979.  He was promoted to the rank of first lieutenant on 5 June 1982.

3.  On 13 June 1983, he was ordered to active duty for 3-year term as a Judge Advocate General (JAG) officer.  He attended the JAG Officer Basic Course at Fort Lee, VA, and was subsequently assigned to Fort Bragg, NC.  He was promoted to the rank of captain on 1 January 1984.

4.  On 12 June 1986, he was honorably released from active duty at the expiration of his term of service and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement).  

5.  Item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) of his DD Form 214 shows he entered active duty on 13 June 1983.

6.  Item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) of his DD Form 214 shows he completed 3 years of total active service during this period of active duty.

7.  On 19 July 1991, he was honorably discharged in the rank of captain.

8.  He provides:

	a.  two letters from the U.S. Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center, dated 23 May 1980 and 6 October 1980, respectively.  These letters approve his application for renewal of his educational delay.  Both letters are addressed to his postal address in Baton Rouge, LA;

	b.  a letter from the U.S. Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center, dated 17 June 1982.  This letter serves as his promotion notification to first lieutenant and is addressed to his postal address in Baton Rouge, LA;

	c.  a form letter from the Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center, dated September 1981, addressed to his postal address in Baton Rouge, LA;

	d.  a DA Form 2496, dated 26 May 1983.  This form is a request for orders and shows he served in the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group for a period of 4 years and 1 month prior to being ordered to active duty.  His home of record is shown as his postal address in Baton Rouge, LA;

	e.  a photocopy of an undated "While You Were Out" message slip;

	f.  a photocopy of an envelope addressed to him from the Macon County Board of Registrars;

	g.  a photocopy of an unidentified registration document citing his address as the Tuskegee Institute, Alabama; and

	h.  three third-party letters of support, each one attesting to his attendance at the Tuskegee Institute prior to his commissioning in 1979.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.  It is important that information entered on the form be complete and accurate.

10.  Chapter 2 of Army Regulation 635-5 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states that extreme care is used when completing item 12 (Record of Service) since post-service benefits, such as final pay, retirement credit, and so forth are based on this information.   A breakdown of entries in item 12 is as follows:

	a.  Item 12a shows the beginning date of the continuous period of active duty for issuance of this DD Form 214.

	b.  Item 12b (Separation Date This Period) shows the Soldier's transition/
separation date.  This date may not be the contractual date if the Soldier is separated early, voluntarily extends, or is extended for make-up of lost time or retained on active duty for the convenience of the government.

	c.  Item 12c shows the amount of service this period, computed by subtracting item 12a from item 12b.  Lost time under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 972, and non-creditable time after the expiration term of service date, if any, are deducted and such time will be identified in item 18 (Remarks).

	d.  Item 12d (Total Prior Active Service) shows the total amount of prior active service and is obtained from previously-issued DD Forms 214.  It shows the total amount of prior active military service less lost time, if any.  If not applicable, enter "00  00  00."

	e.  Item 12e (Total Prior Inactive Service) shows the total amount of inactive service, and is obtained from previously-issued DD Forms 214 and other source documents detailing a member's inactive service.  It shows the total amount of inactive military service, if any.  If not applicable, enter "00  00  00."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his DD Form 214 for the period ending 12 June 1986 should be corrected to show he entered active duty on 13 May 1979, the date of his commissioning from the Tuskegee Institute.

2.  The evidence of record clearly shows he entered active duty on 13 June 1983.  Army regulations state that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  His DD Form 214 accurately reflects his periods of service, to include his inactive service; therefore, there is no basis for granting relief in this case.

3.  The applicant is advised that his appointment letter, dated 13 May 1979, establishes his entry into the U.S. Army Reserve and lists his school as the Tuskegee Institute.  This document should serve as sufficient proof he entered the U.S. Army Reserve in 1979.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100019706



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100026612



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001659C070205

    Original file (20060001659C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the Home of Record (HOR) currently reflected in his Official Military Personnel File be changed from Baton Rouge, Louisiana (LA), to Dallas, Texas (TX). He states that his Selective Service Local Board Number, City, State and Zip Code is reflected as Ennis, Texas; that his enlistment contract shows that his recruiter was located in Dallas, TX; and that the letter from the University of North TX indicates that he resided in Dallas, TX, 3 months before his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055062C070420

    Original file (2001055062C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that her home of record (HOR) be changed from Louisiana to Texas. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that she was recruited and completed all the initial paperwork for her enlistment in the Army while living in Texas and only departed from Louisiana in a courtesy ship status to enter active duty because she was visiting her father. The evidence of record confirms that 7075 Modesto Avenue, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70811 was entered in the applicant’s enlistment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025401

    Original file (20100025401.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides several service record documents. His record contains a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) that shows in item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) the highest rank/grade he held during his period of active service was SP4/E-4 with a date of rank of 17 December 1971, based on Special Orders Number 4, issued by Headquarters, 1st Cavalry Division, dated in 1972. The documents submitted by the applicant to substantiate his request to change his rank/grade as shown on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014067

    Original file (20090014067.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was awarded the AFSM for his service in direct support of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding to item 13 of his DD Form 214 the Armed Forces Service Medal and Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012885

    Original file (20110012885.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * orders awarding superior performance pay * orders awarding the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar * award certificate and a narrative for award of the Bronze Star Medal * page 1 of a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) - Bronze Star Medal * award certificate for the Army Commendation Medal * DA Form 2166-7 (Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Evaluation Report) * Permanent Orders 245-1 - Meritorious Unit Commendation * Permanent Orders 9-8 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017821

    Original file (20110017821.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although a copy of the applicant's appointment order is not contained in her available file, the orders that brought her on active duty as a commissioned officer show her HOR as Columbus, GA. Additionally, her ORB lists her HOR as GA. 2. There is no evidence and she has not provided any to show that at the time of her appointment her HOR was listed as Tuskegee, AL. 3. _______ _ _X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140008067

    Original file (AR20140008067.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, to have her DD Form 214 corrected to show her period of service was from 18 August 1999 through 23 March 2008. The evidence shows she completed her ADT from 18 August - 9 December 1999 and she continued to serve in the USAR until she was discharged on 23 March 2008; however, only active duty periods of service are recorded on the DD Form 214.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00744

    Original file (MD03-00744.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Board first conducts a documentary record review prior to any personal appearance hearing. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (E and F).The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018152

    Original file (20110018152.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (AD)) to show her AD service during Hurricane Katrina Relief Operations. Her record contains a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 8 December 2011, that corrected her DD Form 214 for the period ending 8 December 2005 to show in: * item 12a the entry "2005 09 04" * item 12c the entry "0000 03 05" 7. It states for: a. item 12a, enter the beginning date of the enlistment...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013926

    Original file (AR20070013926.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 135-178 provides for the separation of members of the Army National Guard and Army Reserve when it is determined that a service member is unqualified for further military service by reason of unsatisfactory performance. An enlisted member separated for misconduct which includes unsatisfactory participation will normally be furnished a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions in accordance with...