ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001381C070206
The applicant's DD Form 214 shows in Block 12a he entered active duty on 27 November 1990. Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program), in effect at the time of the applicant's discharge, provides, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001387C070206
On 26 February 2002, the applicant was placed on the temporary disabled retired list (TDRL) due to chronic low back pain and recurrent instability of the right shoulder. He was rated in accordance with diagnostic codes 5210 and 5295, and that at the same time his Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) showed shoulder abduction was limited to 70 degrees and that he had a history of recurrent dislocations, weakness and instability. He was medically evaluated, the PEB was properly adjudicated and he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001387C070206
Rea M. Nuppenau | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 26 February 2002, the applicant was placed on the temporary disabled retired list (TDRL) due to chronic low back pain and recurrent instability of the right shoulder. He was medically evaluated, the PEB was properly adjudicated and he was separated in accordance with the guidelines in effect at the time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001399C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 October 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001399 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant's military service records do not contain orders for the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001399C070206
The applicant's military service records do not contain orders for the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states, in pertinent part that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing: a. award of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001403C070206
The applicant requests that Item 4a (GRADE, RATE, OR RANK) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) be changed from MSG (Master Sergeant) to 1SG (First Sergeant). e. DD Form 363A (Certificate of Retirement) showing his rank as First Sergeant. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001403C070206
The applicant requests that Item 4a (GRADE, RATE, OR RANK) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) be changed from MSG (Master Sergeant) to 1SG (First Sergeant). e. DD Form 363A (Certificate of Retirement) showing his rank as First Sergeant. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001409C070206
The applicants military records are not available to the Board for review. On 9 January 1946, the applicant requested award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing award of the Combat Infantryman Badge; b. showing award of the Bronze Star Medal; c. showing award of two bronze service stars, to be affixed to the European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal; and, d....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001409C070206
The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing award of the Combat Infantryman Badge; b. showing award of the Bronze Star Medal; c. showing award of two bronze service stars, to be affixed to the European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal; and, d....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001413C070206
The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The available evidence shows that the applicant was trained as a coast artilleryman, and that although he served in an infantry unit in the European Theater of Operations during World War II, there is no evidence that he had an infantry MOS, or that he served as an infantryman in active ground combat. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001413C070206
The available evidence shows that the applicant was trained as a coast artilleryman, and that although he served in an infantry unit in the European Theater of Operations during World War II, there is no evidence that he had an infantry MOS, or that he served as an infantryman in active ground combat. Records show the applicant should have discovered the error or injustice now under consideration on 28 January 1946, the date of his separation from active duty. Evidence shows that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001414C070206
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 10 September 1987, the applicant submitted a request for discharge under the provisions of Army regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5, due to his inability to overcome a locally imposed bar to reenlistment. Accordingly, he was honorably discharged on 29 October 1987, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5b, due to a locally imposed bar to reenlistment.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001414C070206
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 10 September 1987, the applicant submitted a request for discharge under the provisions of Army regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5, due to his inability to overcome a locally imposed bar to reenlistment. DISCHARGE REASON BOARD DECISION (DENY) REVIEW AUTHORITY ISSUES 1.110.0200 191/rsn/auth 2.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001419C070206
The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, and the Combat Infantryman Badge. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Air Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 5 January 1968...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001419C070206
The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, and the Combat Infantryman Badge. There are no orders in the applicants service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Air Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 5 January 1968...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001421C070206
Discharge proceedings were initiated against the applicant to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 for misconduct (conviction by civil court). Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The narrative reason for separation used in the applicant’s case is correct and was applied in accordance with the applicable regulations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001421C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 August 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001421 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Discharge proceedings were initiated against the applicant to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 for misconduct (conviction by civil court). Army Regulation 635-200,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001431C070206
The applicant requests that his reentry (RE) code on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from 4 to 3 in order that he can enlist in the Arizona Army National Guard. On 28 July 1998 the separation authority approved the applicants request and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001431C070206
The applicant requests that his reentry (RE) code on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from “4” to “3” in order that he can enlist in the Arizona Army National Guard. On 28 July 1998 the separation authority approved the applicant’s request and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions. On 10 November 2004, the Army Discharge Review Board in a majority decision, granted the applicant’s request, and directed that his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001434C070206
The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) dated 29 July 1979, be corrected to reflect that he entered active duty on 1 May 1975. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 1 August 1982; therefore, the time for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001434C070206
The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) dated 29 July 1979, be corrected to reflect that he entered active duty on 1 May 1975. Therefore, lacking evidence to show that he entered active duty on 1 May 1975 and remained on active duty until his discharge on 29 July 1979, there appears to be no basis to grant his request. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 1 August 1982; therefore, the time...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001440C070206
In effect, the applicant requests that the order revoking the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award) be expunged from the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). There is no evidence contained in the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) showing that he was disqualified for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award). | |DISCHARGE REASON | | |BOARD DECISION |GRANT | |REVIEW AUTHORITY | | |ISSUES 1.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001440C070206
In effect, the applicant requests that the order revoking the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award) be expunged from the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant provides no evidence. There is no evidence contained in the applicants Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) showing that he was disqualified for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001441C070206
Carol Kornhoff | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his Enlistment Contract be corrected to show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 December 2004. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his Reenlistment Contract to include his previous military service and to show that he was not enlisted...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001441C070206
A review of the available records shows that the applicant's Reenlistment Contract also fails to show his previous military service upon reenlistment. The applicant has submitted sufficient evidence to show that it was his intention to enlist in the Regular Army for 3 years and 00 weeks on 20 December 2004. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his Reenlistment Contract to include his previous military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001451C070206
The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 10 February 1977 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001451C070206
The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded. On 26 January 1977, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed that he be furnished a discharge under other than honorable conditions. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 10 February 1977 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001456C070206
A review of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the following entries: Item 12a (Date Entered AD This Period): "1979 10 26"; Item 12b (Separation Date This Period): "1998 01 31"; Item 12c (Net Active Service This Period): "0018 03 05"; Item 12d (Total Prior Active Service): "0003 09 00"; and Item 12f (Foreign Service): "0002 11 26". Guidance for completing the Record of Service is as follows: Item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty (AD) This Period): Enter the beginning date of the enlistment...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001456C070206
Army Regulation 635-5, effective 1 October 1979 (and in effect at the time of the applicant's first immediate reenlistment on active duty), ended the need to prepare a DD Form 214 for enlisted members who are discharged for immediate reenlistment. Evidence of records shows that the applicant's DD Form 214, with an effective date of 31 January 1998, was not prepared in accordance with the governing Army regulatory guidance to show the applicant's beginning date of the continuous period of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001460C070206
Counsel requests the applicant's discharge be upgraded to Honorable. Counsel states the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) already upgraded the applicant's discharge from Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) to General. Following an administrative separation board hearing at which the applicant testified, he was properly separated with a UOTHC discharge by reason of misconduct.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001460C070206
Counsel states the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) already upgraded the applicant's discharge from Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) to General. Upon conclusion of the hearing, the board of officers recommended the applicant be separated with a UOTHC discharge. Following an administrative separation board hearing at which the applicant testified, he was properly separated with a UOTHC discharge by reason of misconduct.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001461C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 October 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001461 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. There is no evidence which shows the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001461C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 October 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001461 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. There is no evidence which shows the applicant served in an infantry MOS or served in active ground combat while an assigned member of an infantry company in Vietnam. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001464C070206
The issue in this case stems from the fact that the document on file in the applicant's OMPF contains neither her acknowledgement nor the appropriate statement required by Army Regulation 600-37 that she refused to acknowledge the disqualification. In fact, the applicant’s record indicates that she was a successful Soldier and was promoted during the period the statement indicates she was disqualified from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001464C070206
The applicant requests that a document denying her award of the Army Good Conduct Medal be expunged from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The issue in this case stems from the fact that the document on file in the applicant's OMPF contains neither her acknowledgement nor the appropriate statement required by Army Regulation 600-37 that she refused to acknowledge the disqualification. In fact, the applicants record indicates that she was a successful Soldier and was promoted...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001465C070206
The applicant served in the Regular Army from 3 June 1998 to 31 January 2001. On 16 January 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of chapter 14, Army Regulation 635-200, for a pattern of misconduct. On 21 January 2001, the applicant was separated with a GD.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001465C070206
The applicant served in the Regular Army from 3 June 1998 to 31 January 2001. On 16 January 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of chapter 14, Army Regulation 635-200, for a pattern of misconduct. On 21 January 2001, the applicant was separated with a GD.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001466C070206
The applicant requests reinstatement to the pay grade of E-6, removal of a “Relief for Cause” noncommissioned officer evaluation report (NCOER) and promotion consideration to the pay grade of E-7. He indicated that she should not be promoted, that she had reached her full potential, that she had failed to meet suspenses of assigned taskings, that she placed her own well-being over that of fellow soldiers and that she had not performed to standards at her current grade. The evidence...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001466C070206
The applicant requests reinstatement to the pay grade of E-6, removal of a Relief for Cause noncommissioned officer evaluation report (NCOER) and promotion consideration to the pay grade of E-7. He indicated that she should not be promoted, that she had reached her full potential, that she had failed to meet suspenses of assigned taskings, that she placed her own well-being over that of fellow soldiers and that she had not performed to standards at her current grade. The basis for any...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001467C070206
Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Army Service Ribbon, the Army Overseas Service Ribbon, the Army of Occupation Medal (Germany), the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge (Carbine) and the Cold War...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001467C070206
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Army Service Ribbon, the Army Overseas Service Ribbon, the Army of Occupation Medal (Germany), the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge (Carbine) and the Cold War Recognition Certificate. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) provides that item 26 of the DD Form 214 will...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001468C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 November 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001468 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 17 September 1980, the applicant's commander initiated action to separate him under the Army's expeditious discharge program (EDP). Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001468C070206
Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. On 17 September 1980, the applicant's commander initiated action to separate him under the Army's expeditious discharge program (EDP). Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 7 October 1980; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001473C070206
The applicant requests that his military records be corrected to show the third digit of his Social Security Number (SSN) is 4 instead of 8. 2. The applicant provides an Honorable Discharge Certificate from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), dated 21 June 1971; a DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record), dated 22 June 1965; and several service personnel records. However, in the absence of evidence from the Social Security Administration verifying his SSN has always had a third digit of "4," there is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001473C070206
The applicant requests that his military records be corrected to show the third digit of his Social Security Number (SSN) is “4“ instead of “8.“ 2. The applicant provides an Honorable Discharge Certificate from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), dated 21 June 1971; a DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record), dated 22 June 1965; and several service personnel records. The applicant’s DD Form 4, dated 22 June 1965, shows the third digit of his SSN is “8.” He enlisted in the USAR on 22 June 1965 for a period...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001475C070206
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (Army Regulation 15-185, paragraph 2-8), effectively shortens that filing period, has determined that the 3 year limit on filing to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. The applicant’s contention that his overall record of good...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001475C070206
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 22 April 1984, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations). The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (Army Regulation 15-185, paragraph 2-8),...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001476C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show award of the Good Conduct Medal, the Army Achievement Medal with First Oak Leaf Cluster, and the Kuwait Liberation Medal. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded a second award of the Army Achievement Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001476C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show award of the Good Conduct Medal, the Army Achievement Medal with First Oak Leaf Cluster, and the Kuwait Liberation Medal. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded a second award of the Army Achievement Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001483C070206
The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicants record contains a Certification of Military Service from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), dated 7 July 1998 which confirms the applicant was a member of the Regular Army during the period 13 December 1949 to 28 October 1955. The applicants military personnel file contains no orders, or other documents indicating he was ever wounded in action, or recommended for or awarded the...