Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001399C070206
Original file (20050001399C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  13 October 2005
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050001399 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Mr. Carl W. S. Chun

Director

Mr. David S. Griffin

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. Ted S. Kanamine

Chairperson

Mr. Patrick H. McGann

Member

Ms. Carol A. Kornhoff

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the award of the Special Forces Tab be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 14 March 1972.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the award was not authorized at the time of his release from active duty.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of Department of the Army, United States Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School, Fort Bragg, North Carolina Permanent Orders 236-1, dated 23 August 2004.  These orders announce the award of the Special Forces Tab to the applicant for a date of service of 
27 November 1970.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which occurred 
on 14 March 1972, the date he was released from active duty.  The application submitted in this case is dated 16 January 2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant's military records show that he enlisted on 20 October 1969 for a period of 3 years.  He successfully completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded the military occupational specialty 05B4S (radio operator).

4.  On 14 March 1972, the applicant was released from active duty due to Phasedown Release Programs.  He had completed 2 years, 4 months and 
25 days of active service that was characterized as honorable.

5.  A review of the applicant's records shows that he is entitled to additional awards, which he did not request and are not listed on his DD Form 214.

6.  There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Good Conduct Medal.  There also is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by his chain of command from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Records do not show indiscipline or lost time.  His records do not contain any adverse information and he received conduct and efficiency ratings of “excellent” throughout his service.

7.  The applicant's military service records do not contain orders for the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states, in pertinent part that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  After 27 June 1950 to the present time, the current standard for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal is 3 years of qualifying service, but as little as one year is required for the first award in those cases when the period of service ends with the termination of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that award of the Special Forces Tab should be added to his DD Form 214.

2.  The applicant is entitled to award of the Special Forces Tab.

3.  In the absence of evidence showing disqualification, the applicant is entitled to the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service from 20 October 1969 to 14 March 1972 ending with termination of a period of Federal military service.

BOARD VOTE:

___cak__  ___phm__  ___tsk___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing:

	a.  	award of the Special Forces Tab; and

	b.  award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period of service from 
20 October 1969 to 14 March 1972.





__________Ted S. Kanamine______
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20050001399
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
20051013
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001399C070206

    Original file (20050001399C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records do not contain orders for the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states, in pertinent part that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing: a. award of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010204

    Original file (20130010204.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 31 (Foreign Service), he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 5 April 1971 through 16 February 1972; b. item 38 (Record of Assignments), he was assigned as a medical specialist and light weapons leader to the U.S. Army Vietnam Individual Training Group; c. item 38, he served as a medical specialist (Special Forces) in duty MOS 91B4S from 11 August 1969 through at least 1 August 1973 when he was assigned to the Special Forces...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022484

    Original file (20110022484.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show award of the Parachutist Badge and Ranger Tab. Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 4 November 1971 through 1 November 1974 and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013281

    Original file (20100013281.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings at most of his active duty assignments and that his OMPF is void of derogatory information or a unit commander disqualification that would have precluded him from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for his qualifying honorable active duty service from 20 February 1969 through 5 December 1970 and to add this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002655C070206

    Original file (20050002655C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB), and Marksman Qualification Badge with Machine Gun Bar (M-60). As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the AGCM, for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 24 July 1969 through 26 January 1972. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001564

    Original file (20150001564.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * Parachutist Badge * Special Forces (SF) Tab * one additional Bronze Star Medal * Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award) with “V” Device * Air Medal * all unit awards he may be eligible to receive 2. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012137

    Original file (20100012137.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214; a Special Forces Training Group Certificate of Training; 5th Special Forces Group Orders for the Combat Medical Badge, a Letter of Commendation; U. S. Army Vietnam General Order Number 3892 (for the Meritorious Unit Commendation); Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) Number 45, dated 1969 (DAGO 45, 1969) (for the Presidential Unit Citation); DAGO 59, 1969, for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084952C070212

    Original file (2003084952C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It is the Board’s feeling that he was not awarded the Good Conduct Medal due to administrative oversight and he is therefore entitled to this award for the period 17 March 1971 through 14 April 1972 and to have this award shown on his DD Form 214. He was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal for the period 17 March 1971 through 14 April 1972, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and 3 bronze service stars to be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003370

    Original file (20140003370.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states a bar is authorized for wear for each period of active Federal service as a member of the U.S. Army outside of the continental limits of the United States for the specific time frames and areas of operation cited in Army Regulation 670-1 or appropriate Department of the Army message. He served a qualifying period of service for award of two overseas service bars; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show 5. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105721C070208

    Original file (2004105721C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show award of the Bronze Star Medal. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows the following awards and decorations: Air Medal, Army Commendation Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, and Combat Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...