Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001434C070206
Original file (20050001434C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:  				
	 

	BOARD DATE:                              	27 OCTOBER 2005
	DOCKET NUMBER:  			AR20050001434


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Mr. Carl W. S. Chun

Director

Mr. Jessie B. Strickland

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. Melvin Meyer

Chairperson

Mr. Allen Raub

Member

Ms. Linda Simmons

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:  

1.  The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) dated 29 July 1979, be corrected to reflect that he entered active duty on 1 May 1975.

2.  The applicant states that his DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects that he entered active duty on 14 November 1975 instead of 1 May 1975.

3.  The applicant provides a photocopy of his DD Form 214 dated 29 July 1979.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which occurred on 1 August 1982.  The application submitted in this case is dated 20 January 2005. 

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  He enlisted in the Oklahoma Army National Guard (OKARNG) on 26 March 1975 for a period of 4 years.  He served in the OKARNG until 14 November 1975, when he enlisted in the Regular Army in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for a period of 4 years.

4.  On 29 July 1979, he was honorably discharged at Fort Polk for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his discharge shows that he entered active duty on 14 November 1975, that he had 4 months and 26 days of prior active service, that he had 1 month and 12 days of prior inactive service and that he had a total of 4 years, 1 month and 12 days of total active service. 

5.  On 30 July 1979, he reenlisted for a period of 3 years and training as an animal care specialist.  He completed his training and remained on active duty until he was honorably discharged in the pay grade of E-4 on 1 August 1982, due to completion of required service.  He had served 3 years of his last enlistment and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his discharge reflects all of his prior service that is reflected on his DD Form 214 dated 29 July 1979.
6.  Army Regulation 635-5 serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides, in pertinent part, that the DD Form 214 will be prepared to reflect all periods of service up until the effective date of separation that is documented in the individual’s records.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that he entered active duty on 1 May 1975 has been noted and found to be without merit.  He initially enlisted in the OKARNG on 26 March 1975.  While he may have entered active duty on 1 May 1975 to attend his initial entry training, he was returned to his unit in Oklahoma and was discharged before he enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 November 1975 and entered active duty.

2.  Therefore, lacking evidence to show that he entered active duty on 1 May 1975 and remained on active duty until his discharge on 29 July 1979, there appears to be no basis to grant his request. 

3.  It is also noted that the applicant received service credit for the period he served in the OKARNG prior to his enlistment in the Regular Army and it is properly reflected on his separation documents.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

5.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 1 August 1982; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 31 July 1985.  However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___MM  _  ___AR __  ___LS___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




		_____Melvin Meyer_________________
		        CHAIRPERSON





INDEX

CASE ID
AR20050001434
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED
20051027
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
19820801
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR 635-200, CH 2
DISCHARGE REASON
ETS
BOARD DECISION
(DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
AR 15-185
ISSUES         1.110.0000
189/CORR 214
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001434C070206

    Original file (20050001434C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) dated 29 July 1979, be corrected to reflect that he entered active duty on 1 May 1975. Therefore, lacking evidence to show that he entered active duty on 1 May 1975 and remained on active duty until his discharge on 29 July 1979, there appears to be no basis to grant his request. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 1 August 1982; therefore, the time...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010844

    Original file (20100010844.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 5 January 1979 to show his entry date as 1 June 1974. The applicant's records show he enlisted in the OKARNG for a period of 6 years on 25 July 1975. The DD Form 214 he was issued for this period of active service shows the following entries: * item 15 (Date Entered Active Duty (AD) This Period) shows "77 07 21" * item 9d (Effective Date (of Separation This Period) shows "79...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007305

    Original file (20130007305.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Despite this, there is no documentation in his record that shows he elected to participate in the RCSBP after receiving his 15-year letter. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provides a means for those who have qualified for Reserve retirement, but who are not yet age 60 [upon which they would be eligible to begin drawing retired pay, upon request, and to participate in the SBP], to provide an annuity to their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014877

    Original file (20110014877.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 January 1980, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed the issuance of an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. Given the voluntary nature of his discharge request and his record of unsatisfactory participation in the OKARNG, his argument that his discharge should be upgraded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067376C070402

    Original file (2002067376C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant entered active duty on 9 October 1968 as a Second Lieutenant, Medical Services Corps (MSC), USAR. Orders Number A-03-005301, USAR Personnel and Administration Center (USARCPAC), dated 10 March 1982, effective 18 June 1982, ordered the applicant to active duty in the rank of captain (sic) for a period of 4 years.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020024

    Original file (20140020024.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 2656-6 (SBP Election Change Certificate), dated 29 September 2011 * letter, dated 22 August 2012, from the U.S. Army (USA) Human Resources Command (HRC) * Orders Number 189-27, dated 18 August 1992, issued by the Oklahoma Army National Guard (OKARNG) * DD Form 2656-7 (Verification for Survivor Annuity), dated 10 August 2012 * certificate of death * certificate of marriage * Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service Form W-4P (Withholding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059779C070421

    Original file (2001059779C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The request was approved and the applicant was discharged under honorable conditions from the OKARNG on 23 October 1979, the same date he was ordered to active duty at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 23 October 1979 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072743C070403

    Original file (2002072743C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 August 1997, the OKARNG issued a NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) honorably discharging the applicant from the OKARNG as a SGT, pay grade E-5, by reason of the individual's request. The investigation further substantiated that: the applicant submitted false information on his application for Army National Guard federal recognition in January 1987 by stating “No” to the question, “Have you ever been arrested or convicted by a civil court of other than minor...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002554

    Original file (20140002554.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show continuous, uninterrupted active duty service from 28 January 1975 through 26 July 1982 and his status as a Vietnam era veteran. The applicant provides: * self-authored statement, dated 31 January 2014 * DD Form 214 for the period ending 28 July 1977 * DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 July 1982 * DA Form 1569 (Transcript of Military Record), dated 21 September 1983 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066044C070421

    Original file (2001066044C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He submits copies of: OMD Pamphlet 600-5, AFTM Program, chapter 2 and 6; Position Description, AFTM Unit Maintenance NCO; State of Oklahoma Military Department Orders 114-13, dated 14 June 1982; and State of Oklahoma Military Department Orders 15-18, dated 23 January 1984, to substantiate his case. The applicant had requested answers from the Board to include; non-review of pertinent evidence/documentation in the orders submitted. It states that Army National Guard (ARNG) AFTM personnel...