ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054103C070420
The Board considered the following evidence: There is an administrative error on the applicant’s DD Form 4/1,4/3 and his DA Form 3286-63. The evidence of record shows he enlisted on 9 November 2000 for 3 years and 00 weeks.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054106C070420
There is an administrative error on the applicant’s DD Form 4/3. The evidence of record shows he enlisted on 09 November 2000 for 4 years and 00 weeks. That the applicant’s DD Form 4/3 dated 09 November 2000, item 20a be corrected to show that he enlisted for 4 years and 00 weeks.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054108C070420
There is an administrative error on the applicant’s DD Form 4/3. The evidence of record shows he enlisted on 9 July 1998 for 3 years and 00 weeks. That the applicant’s DD Form 4/3, dated 9 July 1998 item 20a be corrected to show that he enlisted for 3 years and 00 weeks.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054110C070420
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s requests for a discharge upgrade on 15 February 1973 and on 21 September 1981. However, the applicant’s discharge is an administrative separation, not a punitive separation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054116C070420
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Service members discharged for unsuitability would be furnished an honorable or general discharge. The record does not substantiate the applicant's contention that he was denied any training for which he had enlisted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054138C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The Board notes that the applicant signed documents stating that he understood that he was being separated as an alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054157C070420
The evidence of record shows he enlisted on 2 January 2001 for 3 years and 00 weeks, not 4 years and 00 weeks. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below. That the applicant’s DD Form 4/3 dated 2 January 2001, item 20a be corrected to show he enlisted for 3 years and 00 weeks.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054158C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054162C070420
The evidence of record shows he enlisted on 8 November 2000 for 4 years and 00 weeks, not 3 years and 00 weeks. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below. That the applicant’s DD Form 4/3 dated 8 November 2000, item 20a be corrected to show he enlisted for 4 years and 00 weeks.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054164C070420
The evidence of record shows he enlisted on 9 November 2000 for 4 years and 00 weeks, not 3 years and 00 weeks. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below. That the applicant’s DD Form 4/3 dated 9 November 2000, item 20a be corrected to show he enlisted for 4 years and 00 weeks.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054167C070420
The applicant requests in effect, that his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty DD Form 214, be corrected to show the awards of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and the Army Achievement Medal (AAM). There are no orders in the applicant’s record, which shows that he was awarded the AAM. There is no evidence in the applicant’s service record, which shows that he was awarded the AAM.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054176C070420
NEW EVIDENCE OR INFORMATION : Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in a memorandum prepared to reflect the Board's previous consideration of the case (AR1999032774) on 1 August 2000. It provides that, if a request for a reconsideration is received within one year of the prior consideration and the case has not been previously reconsidered, it will be resubmitted to the Board if there is evidence (including but not limited to any facts or arguments as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054181C070420
The applicant’s military records show that on 12 August 1994, he enlisted in the Army for 3 years in the pay grade of E-1. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. However, at the time of his separation he was incorrectly issued an RE-4 code instead of an RE-3 code, the code for which the applicable regulations indicate is appropriate for the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054182C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 28 August 1985, the appropriate authority approved his request for discharge and directed that an UOTHC discharge be furnished and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. On 12 February 2001, the Army Discharge Review Board advised the applicant that his request was past the 15 year statute and he should request an appeal of his discharge to the Army Board for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054199C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his Pay Entry Basic Date (PEBD) be corrected from 7 September to 9 April 1991, and that he be given the back pay this correction will necessitate. Army Regulation 135-101 provides the policy and sets forth the procedures for the Reserve appointment of Army Medical Department (AMEDD) officers with or without a concurrent call to active duty.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054203C070420
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states that Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) upgraded his discharge. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054214C070420
On 4 December 1981, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request and directed an UOTHC discharge. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 14 December 1983. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054223C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The evidence of record disclosed that the applicant rendered a sworn statement and an affidavit, both of which he knew to be false, indicating that a fraud investigator from MBNA America...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054289C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The Board also noted that he was almost 19 years old when he went AWOL and found no evidence that he was any less mature than other 19-year old soldiers who successfully completed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054294C070420
The applicant states that the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) upgraded his discharge but was unable to act on his request to be restored to active duty. He was given a separation program designator (SPD) code of KFS (voluntary discharge under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10) and a reentry code of 4. The Board notes that the ADRB had upgraded the applicant’s discharge to general under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054297C070420
The Board considered the following evidence: Since his hearing loss occurred during his honorable military service and he has no Article 15’s in his file, he is entitled to a separation for physical disability and a GCM. While he may have had some degree of hearing loss noted at the time of his separation, there is no indication in either the medical or personnel records that his hearing defect incapacitated him and prevented him from performing his duty.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054328C070420
Her records were subsequently submitted to the 1997 LTC promotion board and she was selected for promotion. The policy further provides that in order to be qualified for promotion to LTC an individual must have completed 7 years of TIG as a major and 50 percent of the CGSOC on or before the convening date of the respective promotion board. Based on the officer’s DOR for major she should have been considered for promotion by the 1996 promotion board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054329C070420
The PMS’s recommendation was then approved and the applicant was disenrolled from the ROTC effective 6 October 1999 with the understanding that he would be required to repay his ROTC scholarship. The Board is unable to verify the applicant’s contention that he was disenrolled from the ROTC due to conflicts between ROTC classes and nursing classes. However, while the Army gave the applicant a scholarship in return for his service in the Army after graduation, the military is currently...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054349C070420
Records available to the Board indicate the applicant served on active duty between 17 August 1966 and 14 February 1972. There is no evidence the applicant was ever awarded a Meritorious Service Medal or the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal as an individual decoration and as such there is no basis to correct his record to show those two awards. There is no evidence that he was ever awarded the Good Conduct Medal for his initial period of qualifying service (17 August 1966-16...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054353C070420
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 29 October 1985, the applicant accepted his an NJP for operating a motor vehicle, while drunk. On 5 December 1985, the applicant was honorably discharged in pay grade E-2, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14, for a pattern of misconduct with a HD.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054359C070420
A USAREC opinion, dated 22 June 2001, recommended that the applicant’s date of rank stand as presently noted and stated that the information provided by the applicant did not increase the amount of her constructive credit. A DA Form 5074-R, dated 9 January 2002, published by USAREC and provided to this Board with the 11 January 2002 advisory opinion, awards the applicant a total of 11 years, 3 months, and 22 days of entry grade constructive credit. It further indicated that the entry grade...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054368C070420
The second reviewer, after acknowledging the use of the unwarned statements in the LDI, goes on to state that he “believes that the contemporaneous statements provided by [the applicant] prior to [the required warnings] provide a more accurate description of what happened.” (Memorandum, MAJ M_____, Administrative Law Branch, Office of the Chief Counsel, NGB, 24 Nov 99, subject: Legal Review – Line of Duty Determination on [Applicant].) Further, the NGB transmittal of the applicant’s appeal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054377C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected by upgrading his undesirable discharge. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054413C070420
The information in block 29 of the applicant’s DD Form 214 indicates that he was wounded in action as a result of a shell fragment in both legs and is entitled to the award of the Purple Heart for that wound. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received on 28 October 1952 and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054414C070420
The Awards Branch, Total Army Personnel Command, has advised in similar cases that, during World War II, the Combat Infantryman Badge was normally awarded only to enlisted individuals who served in the following positions: On one hand, the applicant’s separation papers and the SGO files indicate the applicant was not wounded in action. In the face of this contradictory evidence, the Board will make the presumption that, since the applicant was medevaced for “light” wounds, his treatment...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054434C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Evidence of record also...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054435C070420
A DA Form 5261-R (SLRP-Addendum) contained in the record confirms the SLRP contractual agreement entered into by the applicant and the Army at the time of his enlistment. Section VIII of the SLRP addendum confirmed that the recruiter certified that the applicant was eligible for participation in the SLRP and that his enlistment MOS was on the HQDA approved list authorizing this option. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054437C070420
The applicant requests adjustment of his retirement points and correction of his records to show his retirement award. This form shows that the applicant was credited with the following service: a. by amending the DA Form 7301-R (Officer Service Computation for Retirement) of the individual concerned to show his Total Active Service as 22 Years, 02 Months and 16 Days; his Total Service For Basic Pay Purposes as 27 Years, 08 Months and 13 Days; and his Total Service For Percentage Purposes...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054438C070420
Counsel also states that the applicant has submitted records from the DVA showing that he was granted service connection for depression, headaches, and joint pain with a combined rating of 40 percent, and with the effective date being the date following his discharge from service. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion, it is concluded: The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054439C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054441C070420
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation From the Armed Forces of the United States) to show award of the Good Conduct Medal, the “Korean Defense Medal”, the Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar; item 28 (Most Significant Duty Assignment) to show 57th Field...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054442C070420
The record shows that the applicant was in Germany when her separation orders were published. She was also assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of RE-2 (Persons separated for the Convenience of the Government, under chapter 5 of Army Regulation 635-200, whose reenlistment is not contemplated). A soldier enlisted or ordered to active duty normally will be discharged or released from active duty on the date he or she completes the period for which enlisted or ordered to active duty.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054452C070420
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any) His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal and the Army Commendation Medal with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054465C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054482C070420
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 5 June 1992, charges were preferred for the AWOL offense.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054498C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains a copy of the Department of the Army (DA) Form 2339 (Application for Voluntary Retirement), submitted by the applicant and approved by the proper authority on 27 March 1990. It further indicates that retirement requests approved in lieu of PCS will not be withdrawn nor will the retirement date be changed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054499C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Despite the applicant’s contentions that he completed the legal specialist course and that he extended because of the uncertainty of when he could attend phase II of the legal specialist school; the facts in the record show that he extended under a rule for those requiring a reentry code waiver. Additionally, the Board could not determine what legal specialist class dates...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054500C070420
He participated in the SMP as member of the Louisiana State University ROTC and the ARNG from 24 August 1978 until his commissioning on 30 May 1980. Public Law (PL) 104-201, Section 507, dated 23 September 1996, amended the provisions of the law to provide service credit to officers commissioned from the ROTC Advanced Course program who also participated in the SMP, retroactive to 1 August 1979 when the SMP began. BOARD VOTE : _jh__ _tfb_ jtm__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054534C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054538C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. On 25 February 1985, the applicant was discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054545C070420
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his medical records be corrected to show that he incurred a service connected injury when he fell off a tank while serving in Germany in 1953. The physician stated that he would need the applicant’s medical records to record the injury on his physical examination, but locating and retrieving the applicant’s health records could take 12 to 14 weeks. Many of the physicians stated that there was evidence of an old back injury.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054559C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054569C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054570C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board is provided evidence and argument which shows that the applicant’s senior rater placed the applicant in the COM block based on erroneous information he was given by the applicant’s rater; that it was the SR’s desire to place the applicant ACOM. In this case the applicant’s record shows consistently above center of mass ratings prior to the disputed rating, and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054571C070420
As part of a scholarship enlistment in the ROTC program, an individual must sign a DA Form 597-3, which is the agreement between the Army and a potential ROTC cadet. If it is determined that the cadet will be ordered to active duty, the cadet will not be discharged, and Headquarters, Cadet Command will issue active duty orders. Nonetheless, the Board accepts that the applicant’s enlisted service in the Regular Army is equivalent to being called to active duty under the terms of his ROTC contract.