AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01000
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01000 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive medical continuation (MEDCON) orders for the period 17 Sep 11 to 30 Jul 12; or in the alternative she receive Incapacitation (INCAP) Pay for the period she was released from MEDCON orders. In accordance with AFRCI 36-3004, Incapacitation...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01001
His wing commander agreed that he should be restored 10 days of leave and approved a Special Leave Accrual (SLA) request. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that he was deployed on Contingency Exercise Deployment (CED) orders prior to starting his already- approved ten days of use/lose leave for FY12. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01003
Members of the Board considered this application on 3 December 2013. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPSIT, dtd 1 March 2013 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-01003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01016
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-01016 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , , be corrected to show that his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01021
He would like to clear his record and his discharge upgraded to honorable based on the career he had prior to the incident. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01022
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant retired from active duty almost three years prior to the effective date of the provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill program that allow...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01026
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01026 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect his active duty service commitment (ADSC) as of 9 February 2012, the date he submitted his original Post-9/11 GI Bill transfer of educational benefits (TEB) request. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01043
In Accordance With (IAW) Public Law 10 United States Code (USC) 12315, Reserves: Duty with or without pay, any Reserve may be ordered to active duty or other duty: 1) with the pay and allowances provided by law; or 2) with his consent, without pay. According to the applicants travel voucher, his orders were never amended to extend him at Beale nor were his activation orders cancelled and reissued to reflect the new start date of 3 Dec 11. Therefore, we recommend the applicants orders...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01046
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01046 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01051
In cases which include guilty pleas, the military judge ensures the accused understands the meaning and effect of his plea and the maximum punishment that could be imposed if his guilty plea is accepted by the court. It also indicates that a BCD is more than merely a service characterization; it is a punishment for the crimes the individual committed while a member of the armed forces. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01054
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. However, there is no documentation in the applicants official military personnel record to verify he was assigned to a unit that received...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01058
Members of the Board considered this application on 17 December 2013. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, NGB/A1PP, dated 7 March 2013 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-01058 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01059
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01059 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The decedent is awarded the following awards and decorations: 1. Based on a review of his official military personnel records, he should have been awarded the following awards during his service from 6 Jun 41 to 10 Jun 42: BSM, PWM, PUC w/2 BOLC,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01065
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01065 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Medal (AM). The applicant previously submitted a request to AFPC/DPSIDR in 2005, requesting the AM; however, at that time he did not provide any documentation verifying his award of the AM; therefore, they denied his request. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01070
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-01070 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01078
After a thorough review of the applicants military personnel records, the Air Force Personnel Center Directorate of Assignments verified the applicant served at Ben Hoa Air Base, Republic of Vietnam, from 10 November 1972 to 3 January 1973, for 1 month, 25 days; and, at Ching Chuan Kang Air Base, Taiwan from 23 February 1973 to 22 February 1974, for one year; for a total foreign service of 1 year, 1 month, and 25 days. DPSID states they after a thorough review of the applicants master...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01082
On 6 Nov 13, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) denied relief to the applicant indicating that there was insufficient evidence to support his claim. Although the applicant has provided a Chronological Record of Medical Care indicating that he was seen for low back pain at an Urgent Care Clinic, his medical condition did not restrict him from the sit-up and abdominal circumference components, nor was there documentation from the commander invalidating the contested FA. In this...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01087
The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation. The applicants last eight FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 26 Nov 13 79.00 Satisfactory 26 Jul 13 77.20 Unsatisfactory 1 Mar 13 EXEMPT EXEMPT 31 Dec 12 23.75 Unsatisfactory *10 Sept 12 64.67 Unsatisfactory 27 Feb 12 78.30 Satisfactory *15 Nov 11 68.20 Unsatisfactory *12 May 11 63.00 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01101
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-01101 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , , be corrected to show that the narrative reason for his 14 April 1998 entry-level...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01102
A1PP states that according to the NGB Form 22, the applicant was separated with a general, under honorable conditions discharge due to misconduct. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01104
The applicants last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 1 Jun 2012 Exempt Exempt *24 May 12 66.00 Unsatisfactory *2 Mar 12 67.88 Unsatisfactory 5 Jan 10 75.35 Good 3 Dec 08 76.85 Good* Contested FA On 6 Dec 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), due to a lack of supporting documentation from the applicants primary care manager and commander. ________________________________________________________________ AIR...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01106
On 21 Oct 98, the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals approved the finding of guilty and the sentence and the BCD was executed on 19 Feb 99. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denying the applicants request due to untimeliness or on its...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01109
We note the BCMR Medical Consultant states that had the applicant indeed completed a MEB in 2004 and was found unfit by a PEB, his case would have been referred to SAFPC for a final disposition. In this respect, we note that the applicant in PD2009-00221 was initially referred to the PEB for asthma, mild persistent and found unfit for continued military service and separated with a 10 percent disability rating, whereas in the case before us, there is no evidence the he was unable to perform...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01112
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01112 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 6H, which denotes (Air National Guard (ANG) pending discharge in accordance with ANGR 39-10 involuntary) be changed to an eligible code. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01113
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01113 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His physical disqualification discharge be changed to a disability discharge. Item 23 of his NGB Form 22, National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record of Service, indicates the authority and reason for his discharge was paragraph 3.14 of AFI...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01117
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01119
On 19 Aug 2013, the applicant was again requested to sign the addendum and no response was received within the allotted time. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01120
The applicant requested to separate for Pregnancy and has provided no facts warranting a change to her narrative reason for separation. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in establishing the narrative reason of her separation as Pregnancy. Based on the evidence of record, it appears the applicants separation for Pregnancy was consistent with the substantive...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01122
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application is described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request for award of the AFAM (1OLC). Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice in regards to the applicants overall...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01123
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01123 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Item 7a, Place of Entry into Active Duty; be changed to Lackland AFB, TX. His DD Form 214 shows Place of Entry Into Active Duty (PLEAD) and Home of Record (HOR) as Bartlett, IL. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01130
AFBCMR BC-2013-01130 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , be corrected to show that on 31 August 2009, he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits to his dependents. Executive...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01132
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-01132 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01137
On 15 Oct 87, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the action and, after consulting with legal counsel, waived his right to submit a statement in response to the action. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Applicant's Master Personnel Records Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 1 May 13.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01140
________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Upon his divorce, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) advised him to fax a copy of his original divorce decree and a completed copy of DD Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage. On 11 January 2013, DFAS received a DD Form 2656-1 from the applicant requesting to change his SBP election, due to divorce, from spouse and child coverage to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01154
DPSIT states the applicant does not provide evidence that he was a victim of an error or injustice. In December 2012, the applicant submitted his application for TEB, but he was ineligible because he had an approved retirement on file. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-01154 in Executive Session on 16 December 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member ,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01162
The time he was retained in the Inactive Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS) from 1 Mar 99 through 9 Nov 05 be removed. When discharged, the applicant received separation pay and was transferred to the NNRPS for a period of three years. If the Board approves, the applicants record should be corrected to show a 1 Mar 02 to 9 Nov 05 break in service and reappointment into his new position on 10 Nov 05.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01174
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01174 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 14 July 2011, 02 Feb 2012, and 31 Mar 2012 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01175
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was appropriately administered and within the discretion...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01186
A complete copy of the BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit F. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations and the BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation were forwarded to the applicant on 19 Jul 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit G). Furthermore, in view of the fact the applicant was furnished two letters of reprimand (LOR) and a referral enlisted performance report (EPR) as a direct result of the contested FAs, the majority...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01195
On 22 Feb 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and received a composite score of 68.00 resulting in an unsatisfactory fitness score. The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 23 Sep 2013 88.50 Satisfactory 28 Mar 2013 94.67 Excellent *22 Feb 2013 68.00 Unsatisfactory 23 Aug 2013 88.10 Satisfactory 02 Feb 2013 100.00 Excellent * Contested FA On 15 Nov 13 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01196
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: On 5 Jul 10, he transferred his educational benefits to his dependents, making sure each dependent was awarded three months to lock them in. He confirmed via the Department of Defense (DoD) Information System and all three dependents were properly listed and the action was complete. However, in looking at the Submit Transfer Request form at the time of his application, there is no indication that...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01199
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-01199 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01206
The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants military service record, are contained in the evaluation provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denying the applicants requests for the AFGCM w/1S&1BOLCs, SAEMR w/2BSS, and the AFEM w/4BSS. The applicants DD Form 214 reflects award of the AFEM w/2BSS. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01215
On 4 Dec 02, the discharge authority concurred with the recommendation for discharge and the applicant was discharged with a general (under honorable conditions) character of service and a reason for discharge of conduct prejudicial to good order in Feb 03. A complete copy of the NGB/A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He submits a personal statement describing some of the harassment...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01220
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01220 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)) and separation program designator (SPD) code of JBK (expiration of term of service) be changed...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01226
He appeared before his commander for disciplinary proceedings under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and was charged with, and found guilty of, two violations of Article 92: (1) dereliction of duty by willful failure to refrain from claiming reimbursement for taxi expenses, and (2) dereliction of duty by negligent failure to refrain from claiming reimbursement for taxi expenses. The applicant alleges injustice in that he was not negligent in the dereliction of his duty to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01229
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of a Letter of Evaluation; his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty; Request and Authorization for Separation; and three character references. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01234
Grade Determination for Non-Prior Service (NPS) Enlistees, enlistment in the grade of E-3 is authorized when the applicant meets the following criteria: a. Presents General Billy Mitchell Award certificate showing successful completion of the Civil Air Patrol (CAP) training program. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01239
On 25 Mar 75, the discharge authority approved the general discharge without P&R. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. In the interest of justice we considered upgrading the discharge on the basis of clemency; however, based on the lack of post service information we are not persuaded that an upgrade of the characterization of his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01251
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant did not provide any documentation, nor are there are no documents in the applicants personnel file, which substantiate his...