AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01257
He has been a good provider for his family and is involved in his community. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends the applicants service characterization be corrected to reflect honorable, the narrative reason for separation be changed to Secretarial Authority and SPD code to JFF. Although the applicant provides another reason for his discharge, his master personnel records show he was separated under the provisions...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01263
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01263 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 08 Mar 2010 be corrected in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 24 Feb 11 66.80 Unsatisfactory 04 Jan...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01267
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01267 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be promoted to the grade of technical sergeant (TSgt) (E-6) effective the first promotion cycle he tested without his 7- skill level. Members compete for promotion in the CAFSC they hold as of the promotion eligibility cutoff date (PECOD) for a...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01268
On 12 March 1997, the applicant requested an administrative discharge board. On 21 April 1997, his commander amended his 11 March 1997 notification memorandum by adding an additional reason for discharge (the applicants civilian arrest for firing a handgun at a civilian residence). ________________________________________________________________ _ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-01268 in Executive Session on 12 December 2013, under the provisions...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01275
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01275 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her nonselection for promotion to the grade of major while assigned to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) be removed. She will promptly provide her official transcripts to the appropriate office at AFIT and update her records to reflect...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01278
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01278 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation of Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards and reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow him to reenter military service. He contended he had...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01279
Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-01279 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , , be corrected to show that on 12 October 2011, he elected to decline coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan. Director Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01282
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01282 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be allowed to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to her dependent. However, the applicants request was for the TEB to her dependent. In this case, the applicant argues she was never briefed on the rules and regulations governing the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01283
The records show that the applicant and her former spouse were married on 7 Nov 64, and he declined SBP coverage prior to his 1 May 83 retirement. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01286
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. There is no documentation in the applicants file which indicates he was awarded the AFCAM. We took notice of the applicants complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01287
On 29 Oct 64, the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) determined the applicant was unfit for his duties due to his diagnosis of Schizophrenic reaction, paranoid type, moderate, chronic and recommended he be placed on the temporary disability retired list (TDRL). The PEB recommended the applicant be permanently retired with a compensable disability rating of 30 percent. At no time was the applicant boarded for PTSD.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01291
His referral EPR dated from 7 Nov 2009 through 6 Nov 2010 was a direct result of the contested FA failures. His referral EPR dated from 18 Jun 11 through 23 Mar 12 was a result of his FA failure and a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) dated 7 Mar 2012, issued for domestic violence. In reference to the EPR rendered 17 Jun 2011, DPSID found that based upon the legal sufficiency of the Article 15, and no evidence the nonjudicial punishment was ever set aside, they find that its mention in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01298
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01298 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to show that he was not required to use his civilian annual and sick leave for an injury that occurred while serving in Inactive Duty for Training (IDT) status. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01299
On 06 Oct 2011, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained a composite score of 71.00, unsatisfactory. The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 30 Apr 2013 72.00 Unsatisfactory *30 Nov 2012 60.22 Unsatisfactory 30 Mar 2012 90.33 Excellent 09 Nov 2011 83.67 Satisfactory *06 Oct 2011 71.00 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01302
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01302 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 09 Jan 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 09 Jan 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained a composite score of 70.88,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01305
The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 13 Jun 14, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. While the applicant has provided medical documentation indicating a medical condition precluded him from achieving a passing score in a non-exempt portion of the contested FA, he has not met with burden of proving it...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01309
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The lack of information on this program at the time of his retirement caused an injustice. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-01309 in Executive Session on 24 Sep 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01312
In support of her request, the applicant provides a counsels brief, copies of the paralegal interview, a request for reconsideration into the paralegal career field, paralegal accession disapproval, and letters of recommendation. Her legal counsel stated that four years is sufficient time to recoup its training investment in the Air Force; however, non-prior service ANG members are required to enlist for six years, not four, in accordance with ANGI 36-2002, Enlistment and Reenlistment in...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01329
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01329 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants military service records, are contained in the evaluation by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01340
The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 01 Apr 2013 85.00 Satisfactory 11 Oct 2012 100.00 Excellent *10 Aug 2012 81.00 Unsatisfactory 15 Feb 2012 95.75 Excellent 17 Jun 2011 86.00 Satisfactory * Contested FA On 24 Nov 13 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to Insufficient evidence to support contention. In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01341
Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01346
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 31 Mar 13, a copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachments, was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). However, considering that at the time of his original 12 Dec...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01360
On 24 Nov 2013, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to Insufficient evidence to support contention. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of removal of the 4 Oct 11 FA, due to insufficient evidence to support the applicants contention. Her records were administratively corrected to show that she was exempt from participating in the 7 Feb 12 FA, due to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01362
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01362 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be changed to a medical discharge. In support of her contentions that her medical conditions contributed to her misconduct, the applicant provides excerpts from her medical records that she believes describes her medical conditions after receiving the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01368
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01385
On 12 Jul 06, the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) notified the applicant that his request for the PUC, the RVCM, and the Air Force Overseas Ribbon-Short Tour (AFOSR-S) were denied. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01395
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01395 JOHN P. MAAS COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed to Anchorage, AK. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01398
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPFD evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The IPEB noted she was pending surgery and granted her a 30 percent disability rating. However, at the time of the TDRL reevaluation, the applicant had not had the surgery and her physicians at the time were no longer recommending surgery. A complete copy of the AFBCMR Medical Consultants evaluation, with attachments, is...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01400
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 6 Nov 13.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01406
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-01406 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01407
A Standard FM 600, Record of Medical Care, dated 1 Nov 2012, indicates the applicant visited the Medical Treatment Facility, for chest pain and shortness of breath. His medical provider diagnosed him with Acute Bronchospasm, secondary to overexertion in a cold environment with a documented sinus infection. In accordance with AFI 36-2905, dated 26 June 12, paragraph 10, If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01410
To support his appeal the applicant provides an AF FM 422, Notification of Air Force Members Qualification Status; multiple Standard FM 600s, Record of Medical Care, reflecting that he saw his Primary Care Manager (PCM) numerous times about neck and back pain starting from 11 Mar 10 to 12 Mar 2012; two memoranda from his radiologist indicating the applicant had a medical issue with his spine; and a Physician Discharge Summary. The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01413
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01413 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or, entry-level separation without characterization of service) and narrative reason for separation (Erroneous Entry), be changed to allow him to reenter...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01416
AFBCMR BC-2013-01416 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, be corrected to show that: a. The AF IMT Form 2030, USAF Drug and Alcohol Abuse Certificate, initialed, signed and dated 15 July 2006, be, and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01429
On 26 Sep 11, the appeal was denied by his commander, and on 29 Sep 11 by the appellate authority. The SFMIS database reflects that the applicant was charged with rape using force, adultery, and communicating a threat in 2011. Though never prosecuted before a court-martial for these offenses, the applicant was offered the opportunity to go to a court-martial; however, he elected to take the NJP instead and was found guilty of these offenses.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01431
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPRs), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-JFBE/CL recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The deceased former member retired on 31 May 96 and declined SBP coverage. The applicant became entitled to DIC...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01432
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. No other disqualifying condition was ever presented to AFRC/SG for review/adjudication. The AFRC/SG has conducted an exhaustive review of the applicants case and we are in agreement with the expressed rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01441
Members of the Board considered this application on 17 December 2013. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPSIT, dtd 26 March 2013 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-01441 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01442
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-01442 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01445
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a letter dated 17 July 12 from his medical provider at the Joint Defence Facility Pine Gap Medical Clinic, referring him to a neurosurgeon/spinal surgeon and referenced an MRI done in 09 revealed disc spinal cord impingement; a letter dated 11 Sept 12 indicating a medical evaluation between an off-base neurosurgeon and the applicant for neck and back pain; and a second letter dated 14 March 13 from his medical provider stating, "Mr. Smith...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01461
from the Unit CC. On 16 Dec 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to Insufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422 and medical documents to support the request. While the applicant has provided the results of this medical review, indicating that he had a medical condition precluding him from achieving a passing score, this in and of itself, does not convince us the contested FAs should be invalidated. Moreover, we find no...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01465
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01465 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 27 Sep 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 22 Jan 14 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01466
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial, stating, in part, that the applicant's case file reflects that she was denied a participation waiver by the AFRC/SG staff for the period of time in question. While the form is not signed, the Air Force Reserve Surgeon General (AFRC/SG) notes that the applicant was submitted for a participation waiver; however, her request was denied. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01468
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01468 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Re-entry (RE) code of 4E, Ineligible Due to Insufficient Grade Grade is A1C or Below, on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Discharge or Release from Active Duty, be upgraded to allow him to reenlist in the Air Force Reserve. The applicants grade...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01472
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01472 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His compensable disability rating of 20 percent be increased to 40 percent. On 28 Jul 10, the applicant was discharged from active duty, under the provisions of AFI 36-3212, Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, and Separation,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01478
He has no knowledge of receiving any package, 20-year letter with instructions pertaining to RCSBP, or retirement information in the mail or email at that time. §1448, he was automatically enrolled into Option A, "Decline to Make an Election Until Age 60" effective 28 August 2001. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01492
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01492 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: USAFA/A1A recommends denying the applicants request to change his RE code. The applicants attorney states the applicant did not have the right to counsel at his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01494
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01494 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of K13 (Completed Extended Enlistment) be changed so he may reenter in the Air Force. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01503
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-01503 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01511
On 22 Jan 14 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to Insufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422 and medical documents. In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit...