AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00717
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00717 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect award of the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants military service record, are...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00727
The counter only counted 42 sit ups when he actually completed 55. An e-mail from the counter shows her error when counting the applicants sit ups. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show the fitness assessment dated 26 April 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00735
Specifically, section 1552 (f) (1) permits the correction of a record to reflect actions taken by a reviewing authority under the UCMJ. We find no evidence which indicates that the applicants service characterization, which had its basis in his conviction by special court-martial and was a part of the sentence of the military court, was improper or that it exceeded the limitations set forth in the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00738
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-00738 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00740
The complete DPALL evaluations, dated 15 May 2013 and 27 March 2013, are at Exhibits C and D. AFPC/DPSID defers to the Air Force Decoration Board on whether the applicants actions merit award of the MSM, 2 OLC. f. Providing his corrected record, to include the PRF reflecting an overall promotion recommendation of DP, promotion consideration by an SSB for the CY10A Lt Col CSB. d. He be awarded the MSM, 2 OLC, for meritorious service during the period from 25 November 2008 to 30 November...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00741
No further treatment records were included or available for review while this applicant was a member with the MT ANG. Thus, a medical condition that was not unfitting while in service, and was not the cause of separation or retirement, which may later progress in severity causing disability, or which was merely determined service connected by the DVA, is not a basis to retroactively grant a military medical retirement. Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBC, 12 Dec 13.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00743
29, the General Court-Martial convening authority set aside the finding of guilty and the sentence from the applicants 1987 court-martial, and the preferred charges against the applicant were dismissed effective upon his discharge under other than honorable conditions (UOTCH). We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case, to include his rebuttal response to the advisory opinion; however, we do not find the documentation presented sufficient to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00751
On 15 Nov 13, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) denied relief to the applicant indicating that there was insufficient evidence to support his claim. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E). Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Jan 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00755
An evaluation officer reviewed the applicants case and recommended she be discharged from the Air Force and furnished a general discharge for an apathetic and defective attitude only after being considered for rehabilitation. On 27 Mar 81, the applicant was furnished a general (under honorable conditions) discharge and was credited with 1 year and 16 days of total active service. On 28 Apr 82, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered the applicants request to upgrade her...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00756
The board should still consider whether the Control Roster which was issued not only for the contested FA failure, but also for two additional FA failures should be removed. HQ AFPC/DPSIDE administratively corrected the applicants EPR (by voiding the report) for the period 12 Aug 08 through 11 Apr 10, and replacing it with an AF Form 77 stating not rated for the time period, report was removed by order of Chief of Staff of the Air Force. Additionally, this action resulted in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00782
On 20 March 2006, the applicant concurred with the IPEB findings and indicated he had no desire to reenlist in the Air Force Reserve or in the Regular Air Force. Other than his own assertions, the evidence of record appears to indicate the applicant was afforded due process through the disability evaluation system and we find the evidence submitted insufficient to determine otherwise. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00784
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00784 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her enlistment contract be voided, and she be allowed to separate from the Air Force. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She signed an enlistment contract to serve in the grade of Staff Sergeant...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00786
The Medical Consultant notes that this appears to be the first psychiatric admission for the applicant, there is nothing in the records to question a condition existing prior to service and the applicant has greater than 8 years active duty service. The DVA is also empowered to conduct periodic re-evaluations for the purpose of adjusting the disability rating awards (increase or decrease) as the level of impairment from a given service connected medical condition may vary (improve or...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00787
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00787 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Referral Officer Performance Report (OPR) dated 11 Oct 12, be declared void and removed from her records. The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00789
According to information provided, it appears the applicant was not granted MEDCON orders due to the following information: The time and date of initial treatment as stated on the AFRC IMT 348 was 28 Jan 2012 [sic]. The applicants complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends amending the applicants orders for the period 14 Sep 12 19 Dec 12. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00797
Her Retention/Retirement (R/R) Anniversary Date be changed from 29 October 1979 to 21 September 1979 to allow two Inactive Duty Training (IDT) participation points to be moved from her anniversary year ending (AYE) 29 October 1979 to her AYE 29 October 1980. In support of her appeal, the applicant provides copies of her Air National Guard/United States Air Force Reserve (ANG/USAFR) Point Credit Summary, Report on Individual Personnel, and Statement of Service for Naval Reserve Retirement. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00799
Although the applicant was treated for various medical conditions throughout his military service, there was no indication of a mental condition that would warrant consideration through the disability evaluation system (DES). The fact that the DVA has established a nexus between the applicant's post-service mental health diagnosis, his military service and his mood (2011 examination) is not proof of error of reason for release from service, nor does it validate a failure to properly...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00804
The applicant did not file an appeal through the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) under the provisions of AFI 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Reports. The DPSID complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 31 January 2014, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit E). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00811
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was appropriately administered and within the discretion...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00822
The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 30 Jul 13 85.40 Satisfactory 1 Feb 13 75.33 Satisfactory *19 Dec 12 32.50 Unsatisfactory 7 Jun 12 83.50 Satisfactory 29 Feb 12 38.10 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00825
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00825 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. In a letter dated 21 March 2012, DPSIDRA advised the applicant that his DD Form 214, dated 15 September 1993, states in Section 18 that he served in support of Operation DESERT SHIELD/DESERT STORM and that this statement only verifies that he...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00835
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-00835 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that the Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 18 December...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00838
________________________________________________________________ _ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who served on active duty from 1 June 1987 to 13 June 1990. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, the Board finds no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00842
She is due his retired pay from 3 February 2012 to the date of his death on 17 October 2012. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicates that the former member was eligible to receive retired pay commencing 3 February 2012, but for unknown reasons, failed to submit his application prior to his death. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00855
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her deceased husband was treated unjustly and not credited with enough service points due to weight issues. On 3 May 95, according to the documentation provided by the applicant, the deceased former member was honorably discharged from the Air Force Reserve, having completed 18 years of satisfactory service creditable toward retired pay eligibility. A complete copy of the ARPC/DPTT evaluation is at...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00860
The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 14 Oct 12 92.67 Excellent *15 Jul 12 25.50 Unsatisfactory *15 Apr 12 59.40 Unsatisfactory 11 Sept 11 84.40 Satisfactory 15 May 11 81.40 Satisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00872
The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants military service records, are contained in the evaluation by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends approval. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) indicates the applicant was on terminal leave at the time of the TEB program standup and did not have the opportunity to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00888
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00888 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be corrected in Item 23, Authority and Reason, to remove AFI 36- 3209, Paragraph 3.22: discharge in the interest of national security, SPD:...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00894
AFBCMR BC-2013-00894 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00897
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFC recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPFC evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request for award of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00903
His Article 15 received on 3 Jan 13 be set aside and Unfavorable Information File (UIF) be removed from his record. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of staff sergeant (E-5). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C, D, and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00910
The applicants Enlisted Record of Service reflects that he was awarded the DFC and the AM, with Three Oak Leaf Clusters (AM, w/3OLCs). ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, stating in part, that the applicant was previously given guidance in 1998 to assist in the process of requesting the DFC, w/1OLC and additional AMs. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00920
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00920 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receives Incapacitation (INCAP) Pay, for the period 9 February 2012 through 28 October 2012. In support of her request, the applicant submits copies of her letter of request for INCAP pay dated 31 Aug 12, with application for INCAP pay with final...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00923
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00923 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His general court-martial conviction be reversed. When one considers his post-conviction accomplishments, he would have been a significant asset to the Air Force in any career field.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00927
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00927 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her former spouses records be corrected to establish former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The opinion states that the Board can consider cases involving potential claims by more than one spouse or former spouse if there is...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00928
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Air Force who retired on 1 March 1974. The applicant was sent a letter dated 3 March 2011, explaining that an audit of his direct remittance account showed that he had an outstanding balance of $16,959.27 due to non-payment. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00931
The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating Push-ups/score 5 Feb 13 90.10 Excellent 39/6.50 *17 Jan 13 81.70 Unsatisfactory 35/0.00 26 Jan 12 94.90 Excellent 50/9.40 10 Jan 11 93.30 Excellent 49/9.00 19 Feb 10 90.00 Excellent 49/9.00 * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run),...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00945
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his birth certificate, WD AGO Form 53-55, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge; WD-AGO Form 100, Army of the United States Separation Qualification Record, a witness statement from a lieutenant stating that he was stationed in Tinian, Island, Japan with the applicant and various other documents associated with his request. A review of the applicants master personnel records and documentation submitted...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00946
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00946 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflect award of the Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation (RKPUC), the Vietnam Campaign Medal (VCM), and the Presidential Unit Citation with Valor (PUC w/Valor). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00947
What was a greater mistake; however, was for the social worker, under the direction of the psychologist, to issue a recommendation of an adjustment disorder as he was given too short a timeframe for improvement. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00951
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00951 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His enlisted performance report (EPR) covering the period 8 Oct 07 through 7 Oct 08 be declared void and removed from his record. He was not provided any midterm feedback during the evaluation period, but his rater put 15 Feb 08 in Block V as the date...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00957
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, reflects a separation code of JKK (Drug Use) and a narrative reason for separation of Misconduct - Drug Abuse. On 26 July 2012 the AFDRB concluded that the overall quality of the applicants service was more accurately reflected by an Honorable Discharge, but the reason and authority for discharge should remain unchanged. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00961
She made several inquiries in regards to the decedents elected survivor benefits, only to be told each time that she was not eligible due to his type of retirement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, indicating the decedent was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00963
The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 5 Apr 13 90.40 Excellent 16 Jan 13 78.40 Unsatisfactory 14 Jun 12 100.00 Excellent *7 May 12 88.70 Unsatisfactory 8 Feb 12 79.90 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00986
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00986 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Demotion Order ABE3-01, dated 31 October 2012, be revoked and he be returned to the rank of master sergeant (E-7) ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due process was not followed to request...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00989
The legal review did not include any information on the validity of the action, except to say that the AFDW Commanders action was appropriate, which essentially is no action. He attempted to use his rank of major to obtain further access to the flight line which was not otherwise allowable by public affairs protocols and he told the 354th Fighter Wing Vice Wing Commander he attempted to use his badge and credentials to access the base because he was testing the gate security procedures...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00993
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00994
The applicant was discharged from active duty in the grade of sergeant (E-4) effective 15 July 1973 with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. He served 10 years, and 28 days on active duty. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, the Board does not find the evidence presented is sufficient to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00995
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00995 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 16 Mar 11 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00998
In addition, the Air Force Instruction (AFI) stated that an officer transferring into the Air Force should not be given a DOR that subjects them to a promotion board within one year of the transfer or without a completed officer performance report (OPR) on file. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit...