AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05611
On 22 Nov 13, after serving four months and seven days, the applicant was furnished an ELS with uncharacterized service, and issued an RE Code of 2C and Narrative Reason for Separation of Entry Level Performance or Conduct. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05612
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. However, that extension or reenlistment in Aug 2012 still would not have made the applicant eligible for the SRB because member's have to be a 3-skill level in the SRB career field at the time...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05614
There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedents record be corrected to reflect that on 1 Jul 87, he elected to change RCSBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the eligible beneficiary. SBP premiums were deducted from the decedents retired pay until his 28 Jun 11 death. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05615
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFD recommends denial of the applicants request to change his 2Q RE code indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice during the disability process. The Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) reviewed the applicants medical board for diagnoses of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05617
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05617 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive the medals related to his award of the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) and the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05618
Although the applicant provided a citation, his official military personnel records did not contain official documentation such as the signed certificate or Special Order for award of an AFCM. The Air Force Commendation Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States, below the grade of Colonel and foreign military personnel, who, while serving in any capacity with the Department of the Air Force after 28 March 1958, distinguish themselves by outstanding achievement or...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05621
His first LOD was informal; the second LOD was initiated to validate continuation on active duty; the LOD, prognosis and a plan of care must be submitted every 45 days; however, there was some confusion with the process, so his request for MEDCON was not submitted until his active duty orders had ended. The complete DPFA evaluation is at Exhibit C. NGB/SGPA recommends denial, noting a request for MEDCON orders requires medical documentation to support and validate a request. We note that...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05623
Also, while assigned to Spain he was deployed in support of Operation DESERT SHIELD; however, the location or the amount of time for the deployment could not be verified and specific locations are not annotated on the DD Form 214. The SWASM is awarded to service members of the U. S. armed forces who served in support of Operations DESERT SHIELD or DESERT STORM in one or more of the areas of responsibility (AOR) from 2 Aug 90 and 30 Nov 95 in one or more of the following areas: Iraq, Kuwait,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05628
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05628 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The deceased former members records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for spouse coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), naming the applicant as the beneficiary. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05633
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05633 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The Evaluation Officer recommended the applicant be discharged from the Air Force with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge and be considered for probation and rehabilitation. In the interest of justice, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05636
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05636 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to an Honorable Discharge. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. In the interest of justice,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05637
On 4 Mar 09, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) notified the applicant that based on his request, a review by the AFDRB was inappropriate and that he should submit his application to the AFBCMR. Even though the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) has granted the applicant service-connection and compensation for a number of medical conditions, but particularly PTSD, the evidence does not reflect PTSD was an unfitting condition at the time of the applicants release from military...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05641
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05641 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred during the discharge process. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05643
On 20 Jul 12, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) reviewed the applicants request to change the narrative reason and authority for his discharge. ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends changing the applicants narrative reason for separation to reflect Secretarial Authority. The applicant was not diagnosed with a personality disorder at any point during his military service; therefore, the fact that this diagnosis appears on his DD Form 214 is...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05644
It also recognizes single acts of merit and meritorious service if the achievement or service is of a lesser degree than that deemed worthy of the Legion of Merit (LOM); but such service must have been accomplished with distinction. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force Offices of Primary Responsibility (OPRs) and adopt their rationale as the basis for our...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05646
On 14 Feb 13, after self-eliminating from pilot training, an Officer Initial Skills Training (IST) Reclassification Panel recommended the applicant be discharged from the Air Force, and that he repay $148,938 for the unserved portion of the active duty service commitment (ADSC) he incurred due to his Air Force Academy scholarship. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR),...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05647
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05647 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Promotion Effective Date (PED) and Date of Rank (DOR) be backdated to the April 2013 Promotion Board results. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due to an administrative error during a period...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05649
According to his EPR a performance feedback session was completed on 14 Jan 11; however, this is a false statement. In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Aug 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05650
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05650 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable and his narrative reason for separation be changed. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the applicants discharge on the basis of clemency; however, we found the evidence submitted insufficient to recommend granting the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05652
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05652 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to 1J. The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. The applicant does not provide proof...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05653
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He became aware that an AFOEA was authorized for the 4400th Provisional Support Squadron (ELF-ONE) and there were several other areas where the ELF-ONE Command qualified for award of the AFEM and or the Air Force Expeditionary Medal. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05658
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05658 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected as follows: a. Should the Board direct other corrections to the applicants DD Form 214, it would then be appropriate to administratively correct the address listed in item 19a. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05660
In accordance with Air Force Instruction 36-3202, Separation Documents, only periods of foreign service earned during the effective dates of the DD Form 214 will be recorded. The applicants contested DD Form 214 records an active period of service as 7 Dec 1968 to 30 Sep 1974. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05662
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05662 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her service characterization, as reflected in Block 24 of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed from not applicable to honorable. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Reentry (RE) Code 2C gives her an honorable status, so it should be reflected in Block 24. The remaining...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05663
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05663 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation From Active Duty, effective 26 Sep 78, be changed to reflect his total active service dates as 11 Dec 71 through 26 Sep 78. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR),...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05667
On 21 January 1985, after consulting with legal counsel, the applicant submitted a statement in regards to the Article 15 action as to why his urinalysis test came back positive and a copy of an Air Force Times article. On 6 July 1988, the applicant applied to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) to have his discharge upgraded to Honorable. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05669
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05669 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 12 September 2014, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05671
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05671 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, item 26, Separation Code, be amended to reflect MCC (Reduction in Force) rather than MGQ (Intradepartmental Transfer). The applicant was released from active duty on 3 February 2006 and transferred to the Air Force Reserve. If the Board agrees...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05672
In a letter to the applicant dated 4 February 2014, AFPC/DPAPP advised the applicant that the amount of Foreign Service time reflected on his DD Form 214 is correct. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 4 February 2014. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 February 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05675
STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicants military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 24 Jul 81. On 29 Jul 82, an evaluation officer reviewed the applicants case and recommended he be discharged from the Air Force and furnished a general discharge for a progressive downward trend in his attitude and duty performance. On 24 Dec 85, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered the applicants request to upgrade his discharge and reenlistment code, and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05676
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05676 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be designated the beneficiary for her former spouses Survivors Benefit Plan (SBP). As such, we find the death certificate provided by the applicant sufficient to conclude that the decedent was not married at the time of his death. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05686
On 18 Jun 09, an informal physical evaluation board (IPEB) determined the applicants coronary heart disease was unfitting for continued military service and recommended he be discharged with severance pay with a disability rating of 10 percent. The DVA Schedule for Rating disabilities indicates the applicants coronary artery disease rating fell at or below the criteria for a 10 percent disability rating; as he was also rated by the DVA. While the Board acknowledges the comment by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05688
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05688 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code 4I which denotes Serving on Control Roster be changed. On 18 Apr 07, he was honorably discharged from active duty with an RE code of 4I and narrative reason for separation of Completion of Required Active Service. He...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05689
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05689 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 12 Jan 05 discharge, be corrected as indicated below: 1. Although the applicant request his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect 3 months and 8 days of foreign service we agree with the OPRs recommendation to administratively...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05693
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. He could have used this time to earn the 33 non-paid points he needed to complete a satisfactory years of service for RYE 17 Dec 12. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 18 Feb 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05694
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05694 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. DPSOR states the medical authorities concluded that the applicant had a pre-existing condition that would have precluded him from joining the Air Force had this condition been made known at the time of his enlistment. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05695
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Records indicate that he did not make an election within the required time period prescribed by U.S.C. Based on the evidence before us it appears the deceased service member was properly...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05698
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05698 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be returned to active duty. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was retired on 1 Nov 13 based on her Mandatory Separation Date (MSD); however, she was selected for promotion to the grade of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05699
The applicant would have been advised at the time she received her approval letter of her appointment grade and service dates and would have been aware that she was not awarded credit for her Masters Degree. While the timing of her date of appointment into the Air National Guard is unfortunate, this is not sufficient justification to change an appointment grade and date of appointment for an officers appointment that was approved over two years ago. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05700
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05700 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits (TEB) to his dependents while on active duty. He was presented with a message on the MilConnect website indicating his transfer request would not be final until he digitally signs an Air Force Form 4460, Post 9/11 GI Bill...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05701
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05701 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her 8 Aug 12 enlistment contract authorizing her Zone C Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be enforced or in the alternative be cancelled. On 21 Nov 12, the applicant filed a complaint with the IG alleging her 8 Aug 12 reenlistment contract was altered removing the SRB information without her knowledge and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05709
The DD Form 4 does not reflect his SSN, only his service number. The DD Form 214 reflects his SSN as XXX-XX-XXXX. The complete DPSIRP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant provided a printout from the Social Security Administration that reflects his SSN as XXX-XX-XXXX (Exhibit E).
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05713
According to information provided by Air Force Office of Special Investigation, a criminal record pertaining to the applicant does not exist. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Oct 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05714
Should the Board recommend changing the initial enlistment information; his record should be corrected to show that he enlisted in the grade of E-2. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility states the applicant should have been promoted to the grade of E-2 yet recommends denial because his enlistment grade will not change his current DOR or years of service. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05716
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 December 2013. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 September 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05718
DPSID was unable to verify award of the Air Defense Weapons Center Award as it is not an official award of the Department of Defense or the United States Air Force. The applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error or injustice was discovered as required by Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552 and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records. Therefore, other than the relief that has been already granted administratively, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05722
On 25 Apr 86, the applicant was furnished a general discharge for Misconduct Drug Abuse, and was credited with three years, six months, and six days of total active service. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency, however, in the absence of any evidence related to the applicants post-service activities, there is no way for us to determine if the applicants accomplishments since leaving the service are sufficiently meritorious to overcome the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05724
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05724 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive credit for his foreign service in Thailand and Guam (Administratively corrected), and Okinawa. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05725
The application has not been filed within the three-year time limitation imposed by Air Force Instruction 36-2603, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records. Promotion boards selected individuals and the quotas received determined the number that could be promoted. Based on his DOR to Sgt, he would have been eligible for promotion consideration to the grade of SSgt beginning in 1969.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05729
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05729 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient for us to conclude that the applicants post-service activities warrant such...