AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05472
The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application because the characterization is unfair. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 February 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05473
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05474
On 21 Mar 11, his son was born and he turned in his sons birth certificate for update in DEERS. Since he had not been married before and was still on Active Reserves, he was told there was nothing else needed and DEERS was updated. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that that the application will only be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05476
Based on the documentation in the applicants master personnel records, the discharge, to include the narrative reason for separation, were consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. Therefore, the Medical Consultant recommends the applicant submit a more current complete blood count, serum iron, iron-binding capacity, and ferritin, the result of a rectal examination to confirm absence of blood in the stool, and a statement that he has not...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05477
On 6 September 2013, DFAS received the applicants DD Form 2656, Survivor Benefit Plan Election Change Certificate, requesting to decline SBP coverage. Since it is within one year of the applicants retirement, DFAS recommends that an administrative change be granted and that the Board approve the applicants request to change his SBP declination to spouse coverage. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 September 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05478
The applicant contends all his disciplinary actions should have been purged after six months; however, he received three MFRs, two LOCs, and four LORs for disciplinary actions during his last reenlistment period and commanders should consider all infractions that occurred on the current reenlistment when determining reenlistment eligibility. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-05478 in...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05480
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05480 ` COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Service Members Group Life Insurance Traumatic Injury Protection (TSGLI) claim be approved due to his inability to perform at least two of the six Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for 60 consecutive days. While the Board notes the documentation submitted by the applicant in support of his contention that he...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05484
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request for void/removal of FA dated 30 Jun 10. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Feb 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05498
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05498 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Other Than Honorable Discharge be upgraded to Honorable. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05504
He has submitted documentation that supports he needed a total knee replacement which should have been completed while he was on active duty. However, when collectively considering the consistent recommendations for joint replacement, the apparent unfulfilled external consultation with a joint replacement surgeon, the lack of availability of the procedure on base, and the fact that the applicant received the joint replacement upon his return to continental United States, then the Board may...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05506
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05506 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge [sic] be upgraded. The complete JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: She was never...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05509
It also disqualified him from retention in the Air Force. The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 8 August 2014, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit E). THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05514
Duplicate copies of the AF Form 3070C, Record of Nonjudicial Punishment Proceedings (Officer), be removed from his military personnel records and his officer selection record (OSR). (administratively resolved) APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Official written rebuttals to the non-judicial punishment under Article 15 should be included in his personnel records and OSR. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05514.docx
Duplicate copies of the AF Form 3070C, Record of Nonjudicial Punishment Proceedings (Officer), be removed from his military personnel records and his officer selection record (OSR). (administratively resolved) APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Official written rebuttals to the non-judicial punishment under Article 15 should be included in his personnel records and OSR. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05515
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05515 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Block 12c (Net Active Service This Period) of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to reflect five years and five months rather than four years and eight months. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05517
The applicant retired prior to the implementation of the program (1 August 2009) and therefore was never eligible to transfer benefits. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05521
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05521 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be removed. On 10 July 1981, the applicant was tried by special court- martial for: a. one specification of wrongful transfer of marijuana on or about 12 September 1980, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05524
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05524 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His duty history be amended to reflect Deputy Commander, 92nd Mission Support Group (MSG) rather than Deputy Commander, 92nd Logistics Readiness Squadron (LRS). APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: While he was not directly assigned to the MSG, and his duty history reflects he served as the Deputy Commander for the LRS,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05525
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05525 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect she served in support of Operation DESERT SHIELD from Jan 91 to Apr 91. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05526
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating the applicants separation orders have been amended to reflect the correct service characterization intended by the discharge authority and a copy has been placed in the applicants record. On 6 Sep 12, the Air Force Review Boards Agency, acting under authority delegated by the Secretary of the Air Force, denied the applicants request for Lengthy Service Probation...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05529
A suspended reduction to the rank of SSgt would have more appropriate for a first time offense. The reduction to the rank of Senior Airman (SrA, E-4) as a result of Nonjudicial Punishment (NJP), UCMJ was mitigated to a fine of $1,000. For example, if a member receives Article 15 punishment on 1 June, consisting of a reduction in grade, and the commander subsequently (on 1 July) mitigates the reduction to forfeiture, both the effective date and DOR for the restored grade is 1 July.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05533
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05533 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. In addition, he did not provide medical documentation from the date the injury occurred verifying medical treatment was required and received, or eyewitness statements from individuals who saw his injury and can attest to the circumstances in which he was injured. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05536
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in Title 38, U.S.C., Chapter 33 (Post-9/11 Educational Assistance), are able to transfer unused educational benefits to their dependent...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05537
Although the discharge was properly processed according to the applicable regulation at the time, the applicant's discharge record indicates that her discharge was based solely on DADT and did not involve aggravating factors. In light of the repeal of DADT and in accordance with the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) guidance memorandum, Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of Title 10, United States Code, dated 20 September 2011, Discharge Review...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05538
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request for an additional 10 percent increase in retirement pay. Regarding references to the Secretary of the Air Force (SecAF) and the Chief of Staff, he reiterates that he had no knowledge of whether or not he was approved for the 10 percent retirement entitlement upon approval of the AmnM and his former unit and Air Force personnel officials could find no record of this consideration either. THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05542
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 8 Aug 83 separation, Item 19, Mailing Address after Separation, be changed to San Antonio, TX. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicants request to change his mailing address after separation. The applicant failed to provide supporting documentation that the Florida address was in error.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05544
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05544 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended to include award of the Combat Action Badge and any other awards he may be entitled to. We took careful notice of the applicants complete submission in support of his request and we are not persuaded that he should...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05545
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05545 COUNSEL: NONE INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His ten-year Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) for Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT) be declared void. The applicant contends he never signed a service commitment agreement upon entry to initial pilot training. The FY13 ACP program implementation instructions included a criterion that in order to be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05548
On 20 Jan 61, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force for a period of four years. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicants request for service credit in Vietnam. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05553
Public Law 92-425 established the SBP on 21 Sep 72 and authorized an enrollment period for retired members to elect SBP coverage. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Feb 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05562
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. In addition, he provides a personal note to the Board in which he claims he followed the travel orders, but the units he was assigned to at Kirtland Air Force Base, NM and Korea have both been...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05570
On 7 April 2009, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicants request to upgrade his discharge to Honorable. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E). AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice in the processing of the discharge.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05574
The DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant provided a written statement indicating that he was in Thailand from 4 Oct 66 to 26 Oct 66. The applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error or injustice was discovered as required by Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552 and Air Force Instruction 36- 2603. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05575
Her husbands records be corrected to show that he was on active duty in the Army from 21 Apr 52 to 29 Jan 55. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial of the applicants request to correct the decedents service dates. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05577
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. After a thorough review of the applicants personnel records there was no official documentation showing the applicant served in unit that was awarded the PUC. The applicant served with the 306th...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05578
In this respect, the applicant needs to submit an AF Form 948, Application for Correction/Removal of Evaluation Reports, with all required supporting documentation, through the vMPF/Evaluation Appeals found under the Most Popular Applications. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-05578 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Nov 13, w/atchs. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Jul 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05579
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05579 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05582
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: According to the decedents WD AGO Form 53-98, Certificate of Service, Item 30, Wounds Received in Action, he was wounded on 12 Nov 43 in New Guinea. He was never awarded the PH and his survivors would like to have his records corrected to reflect award of the PH. The decedent pursued award of the PH per his request dated 8 Sep 44; however, a memorandum from the Adjutant General dated 17 Feb 45, states the investigation in the case of the request for award of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05587
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit B. The applicants MEDCON request was disapproved by AFPC/DPFA because her orders ended on 31 October 2013, she suffered a break in service and her LOD was not finalized in accordance with 15 August 2012 Secretary of the Air Force MEDCON Policy Guidelines. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05588
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05588 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that: Her AF Form 899, Request and Authorization for Permanent Change of Station - Military, dated 15 July 2013, be amended in Block 19, Authority and PCS Code, to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05594
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIDE evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 Jul 14 for...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05596
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. There is no record in MilConnect or the Right Now Technology showing the applicant made any inquiry/attempt to apply for the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) prior to retirement. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05601
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05601 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her entry level separation be changed to a medical discharge with benefits. Her dependent medical records reflect that she had an allergy to "pecan" nuts. Nevertheless, since the applicant was presumed fit to enter military service [at least from a musculoskeletal perspective] and she was presumably...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05602
The intent of Congress (and therefore the purpose of the statute) was to provide an incentive that would encourage aviation service officers not to leave active duty. Upon review of his application, A1PF concluded that he should be permitted to adjust the effective date of his current FY13 ARP agreement from 27 Aug 13 to 2 Feb 13. However, in view of the fact the Secretary of the Air Force (SecAF) has determined that any delay in the approval of the ARP program for a given year cannot...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05603
Before recommending discharge the commander noted he reviewed the applicants records. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge on the basis of clemency; however, after considering his overall record of service, the infractions which led to his administrative separation and the lack of post-service information we are not persuaded that an upgrade is warranted on that basis. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05605
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05605 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to void his election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). If the service member voluntarily files an election for former spouse coverage, a request to change that election to spouse coverage may be made at any time after the service member remarries. As the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05606
His correct Foreign/Sea Service time. Upon review of his records, the applicants entitlement to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award, Air Force Longevity Service Award and the National Defense Service Medal was verified. The ribbon was authorized to be awarded to Air Force and Air Force Reserve members credited with an overseas tour on or after 1 September 1980.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05607
He was miscounseled when not told that he must reenlist before entering an extension, as well as, the 23 month extension was obligated service which would prevent him from reenlisting at a later time due to his high year tenure. On 31 March 2011, the applicants commander recommended approval of his request and his date of separation of 28 August 2012 was extended to 28 July 2014. While the applicant contends he was not offered the option to reenlist in March 2011 for the purpose of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05608
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05608 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended to reflect award of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of the MSM award recommendation. There is no evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05609
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05609 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits (TEB) to his dependents on 8 Feb 10, the original date of his TEB application submission. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary...