AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04759
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. On 31 May 02, the applicant was released from active duty with a reason for separation of sufficient service for retirement. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04760
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04760 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), rendered for the period 22 Jun 10 through 18 Nov 10, be removed from his records and replaced with an existing Letter of Evaluation (LOE) for the same period. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04761
The AFOR-ST is awarded to Air Force and Air Force Reserve members credited with completion of an overseas tour on or after 1 Sep 80. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04770
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPANF recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. On 4 Aug 05, he signed Air Force Form 1056, Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC) Contract, acknowledging that he would incur a four-year ADSC from the date he entered onto...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04771
Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 Bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election (if applicable), may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents pursuant to Service regulations (Title 38 USC, Chapter 33, § 3319(b)(1)). If you do not receive...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04775
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04775 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His character of service be changed from under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) to honorable. These additional aggravating factors are indicated by the applicants UOTHC service characterization given by the discharge authority. The complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04779
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04779 ER COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His grade of airman first class (E-3) be reinstated as of 16 May 13. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are included at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04781
On 11 Apr 14, Special Order AC 100052, rescinded Special Order AC-014635 to adjust the applicants service dates, retired grade and highest grade held on active duty. Effective 1 Feb 93, the applicant was retired in the grade of SSgt and credited with 23 years, 11 months and 6 days of active duty. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice noting the Secretary Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) previously considered the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04791
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04791 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code "2C" (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without service characterization of service) be changed to allow him to reenter military service. On 28 Sep 13, the discharge authority directed the applicant be furnished an entry-level separation with...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04792
She had an Unfavorable Information File (UIF), a referral Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for failure to follow a direct order and several Letters of Counseling (LOC) for her work performance. The applicant does not provide any proof of an error or injustice in reference to her RE code. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04794
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04794 COUNSEL: NONE INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her disability retirement be changed to a retirement under the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA). At the time of her separation, she should have received the same retirement benefit privileges as given to other service members that retired under TERA. On 30 Jun 94, the Secretary of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04798
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04798 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04801
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04801 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Designator (SPD) code of JFY (Adjustment Disorder) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04804
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04804 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated in the United States Air Force or, as an alternative, his characterization of discharge be upgraded from general (under honorable conditions) to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04806
AFBCMR BC-2013-04806 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , , be, corrected to show that he was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. In accordance with Section 1552(a)(4) of Title 10, United States Code, this...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04809
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04809 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with her 22 May 95 separation, Block 12c., Net Active Service This Period, be changed to reflect 5 years, 1 month, and 10 days rather than 4 years, 6...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04811
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due to administrative reasons, the aforementioned EPR is not loaded in the PDS and should be updated to reflect an overall rating and close-out date of 5B-31 May 2010. According to his AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, a medical evaluation revealed he had stage 3 kidney failure that precluded him from obtaining a passing score. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of an AF Form 77, Letter of Evaluation and AF...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04812
However, there was no documentation in the evidence of record to indicate the deceased former member was incompetent at the time of his passing. The applicant has provided no evidence her deceased husband was incompetent prior to his death. The service member must live until the date of separation to be considered retired. A complete copy of the AFPC/JA evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPFD recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04813
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) enlisted promotion and demotion policy was folded into an active duty Air Force publication AFI 36-2502, Airman Promotion/Demotion Programs, 31 December 2009. Air Force Reserve enlisted members are promoted to chief master sergeant in accordance with AFPD 36-25, Military Promotion and Demotions and Air Force Reserve Enlisted Promotion Policy. Based on this...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04814
The applicant believes the Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider her untimely application because she did not realize the omission of her DESERT STORM service until she applied for a State bonus. Although she requests the medal be added to her record, they presume her request is actually for the Southwest Asia Service Medal, which is the appropriate award authorized for direct support of Operation DESERT STORM. Service members participating as regularly...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04821
________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due to administrative errors/delays his application was not processed within the required time per AFI 36-2803 - which states decorations must be completely processed within three years of the end date of the nomination. He provided the awards application which shows the submission was held several months with some coordination. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04823
________________________________________________________________ _ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who served on active duty from 30 December 1970 to 5 December 1974. The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants military personnel records, are contained in the evaluation provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04830
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04830 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed to Weyerhaeuser, WI. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04833
AFI 36- 3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for ANG and Air Force Reserve Members, states if a member has not fulfilled their military service obligation they may be discharged for unsatisfactory participation when the commander concerned has determined that the individual has no potential for useful service under conditions of full mobilization. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04834
DPFD states the applicants DD Form 214 correctly reflects the grade of SrA which was the active duty grade she was wearing upon her date of separation. ________________________________________________________________ _ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04834 in Executive Session on 12 June 2014, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Oct 13,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04835
Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) who meets Post- 9/11 GI Bill eligibility requirements and at the time of the approval of the members request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance: Has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Air Force from the date of request, regardless of the number of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04837
AFBCMR BC-2013-04837 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , , be corrected to show that at the time of his discharge on 19 January 1999, he was issued a Reentry code of "3K." In accordance with Section 1552(a)(4) of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04842
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04842 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at ExhibitS C, D and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID states no further action is required concerning the applicants request for...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04846
Unfortunately, JAJM does not have any record of the applicants court martial so it is difficult to make a well informed recommendation. Through research, they determined that he filed a petition for grant of review with the United States Court of Military Appeals on 10 May 82 and the Court denied the petition on 23 Jun 82. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04848
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The name of spouse and dates to whom the decedent married is in error. When the former service member and the applicant married - he did not request SBP coverage be established on the applicants behalf within the first year of their marriage. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that she has been trying to obtain benefits based on her late husbands passing.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04851
DFAS indicates that according to the law, they cannot discontinue the applicants SBP coverage. The evidence indicates the applicant did not make an SBP election by completing a DD Form 2656 prior to his retirement; therefore, since he was married at the time of his retirement, automatic coverage was established. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 May 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04853
DPSID states that after a thorough review of the applicants military personnel record, they were unable to verify the applicant was awarded the VSM. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary (OPR) responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice in regard to award...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04857
A highest grade held determination was not completed and the applicants Reserve retired pay was established in the grade of TSgt. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04858
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit H. ________________________________________________________________ _ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who served on active duty from 5 February 2002 to 4 October 2007. However, further evaluation by Mental Health personnel, subsequently ruled-out the applicants diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder and indicated his symptoms supported a diagnosis of Personality Disorder. For an accounting of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04859
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 21 Jan 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Mar 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04860
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04860 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his son retroactive to the start of the program (August 2009) with time served and no Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC). The notes in the Right Now Technology (RNT) clearly...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04864
Based on the applicants submission of TDY Order T-408, dated, 28 January 1968, indicating his TDY permanent duty station at APO SF 96264 (Kusan Air Base, Korea), we believe he has provided sufficient evidence to establish that he had boots-on-the-ground in both the RVN and Korea. However, neither of the source documents provided confirm the exact dates the applicant served in the RVN or Korea. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04865
________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPA recommends approval to reflect no break in service. Due to a delay in processing of the 20 August 2012 scroll at the SECDEF level, the applicant incurred a break in service between her date of separation (DOS) and appointment date into the Air Force Reserve. OSD General Counsel determined the appointment date is the date the Secretary of Defense approves the appointment or the date the oath...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04869
In many cases, the AFPC advisory opinions for those cases use words that match the verbiage in the AFPC advisory opinion on his case. He visited the Air Force Education Center in person to complete the transfer application. He believes the procedures regarding how members transfer benefits have changed from the date he executed his transfer in November 2010.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04870
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04870 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Active Guard Reserve (AGR) orders covering the period 1 Apr 06 through 30 Sep 07 be amended to show his permanent duty location as the Roosevelt National Guard Armory, Phoenix, AZ, instead of Tucson International Airport, Tucson, AZ, from 1 Apr 06 through 15 Jul 07, and from 16 Jul 07 through 30 Sep 07 his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04871
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04871 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Washington, Missouri, to Las Vegas, Nevada. According to his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, his HOR at time of entry is reflected as Washington (Franklin) MO. The remaining...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04873
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04873 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The home of record on his DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, be changed from Eugene Oregon to Gold Beach, Oregon. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR),...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04877
Unless member is given a composite exemption, member will continue to prepare for and be assessed on non-exempt components of the FA. Paragraph 4.2.2.2 The provider will specify the length of time required for physical limitations. While the applicant provided a statement signed by the medical provider stating that she had a documented medical condition, there was no evidence that specifically listed what the applicant's limitations were for each fitness assessment. APPLICANT'S REVIEW...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04879
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04879 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to a 1 series. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04880
When he used TA funding to complete his Masters Degree in an attempt to improve his Air Force record, he did not know he was going to be separated. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-IN recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04881
The performance must have been such as to merit recognition of key individuals for service rendered in a clearly exceptional manner. The verbiage of the citation is consistent with the applicant's claim of receiving the award upon his retirement; however, no Special Order was provided with this request or could be located within the applicant's official military personnel record. After reviewing the evidence of record and the evidence provided in support of this appeal, i.e., copies of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04882
On 29 Feb 12 his commander requested base medical evaluate him. The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days, but no later than 7 days prior to FA to provide time for medical evaluation, when indicated; however, failure to complete FSQ does not invalidate the FA. In this respect, we note the applicants submission does not contain sufficient documentation to include; support from his commander requesting the FA be invalidated; AF Form 422 exempting him from the contested...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04883
In support of his appeal the applicant submits; an Emergency Care Center Discharge, signed by his medical provider on 1 Aug 13, which indicates the applicant was diagnosed with weakness and low phosphate. Additionally, he includes the following supporting documentation: Result sheet for the contested FA, DD 422 Notification of Members Qualification Status dated 27 Sep 12 and 26 Sep 10 indicating he was exempt from push-ups, FA history, excerpts from his medical record, and a letter from...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04884
The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 but no later than 7 calendar days prior to FA to provide time for medical evaluation, when indicated; however, failure to complete an FSQ does not invalidate the FA. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request for void/removal of FA dated 12 Sep 13. In particular, the applicant has provided medical documentation validating that he had a medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04887
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04887 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late spouses record be changed to show he elected spouse coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). On 22 February 2000, APPLICANT, submitted a timely and effective claim for a survivor benefit annuity. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 May 2014.