AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04888
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1P recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The mere fact that a member meets all the eligibility criteria for promotion does not automatically guarantee promotion to the next higher grade; the immediate commander must first recommend the airman...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04889
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served two tours in Vietnam and was injured twice, but was not awarded the PH. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04890
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04890 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 28 Aug 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). Also, there was no indication the commander wanted to invalidate the Fitness Assessment. In accordance with (IAW)...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04891
The complete DPSIC evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPSICs recommendation is based on the information from his VMET, which does not display the correct amount of time that he worked as a dog handler. The Board can review his Military Working Dog Handler's Certificate, dated 8 January 2010. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the DD Form 214,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04894
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04894 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation program designator (SPD) code of JDA, narrative reason for separation of fraudulent entry into military service, and reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with uncharacterized character of service) be changed to allow him to reenlist. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04896
The applicants AF Form 11, Officer Military Record, reflects foreign service from 28 Jan 68 to 1 July 68 for 155 days. While the applicant has not provided conclusive evidence of the exact length of time he was in Korea, it is our opinion that the available evidence appears to weigh more in favor of amending the applicants DD Form 214 to reflect his foreign service as requested. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04898
On 5 May 2014, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) considered and denied the applicants request to remove the FA dated 14 February 2012 from the AFFMS. The board stated while they had determined there was clear evidence the applicant was miscounseled on what the score was to pass the fitness assessment, the FAAB had determined that it is the applicants responsibility to understand what the standards are for his age requirement. After a thorough review of the evidence of record...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04899
On 23 Sep 13 he met with his medical provider who validated he had a medical condition In support of his appeal the applicant submits an AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, signed by his medical provider and commander. In view of this and since this avenue of administrative relief was available at the time the applicant submitted his application, we find it would be inappropriate to consider this application for adjudication at this level, as there exists a...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04901
Therefore, the referral EPR itself should be removed from his record. The applicant contends that because pages of his rebuttal to the contested referral enlisted performance report (EPR) are missing, he is the victim of an injustice and the contested EPR should therefore be removed. Furthermore, while we note the comments of the Air Force OPR indicating that this Board should direct that the missing pages be added to his record, we are not convinced that the evidence provided by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04905
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04905 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His break in service be eliminated by extending his date of separation (DOS) from the Regular Air Force. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04912
Transferability of Unused Education Benefits to Family Members. The Secretary of the Air Force determined that the Air Force would offer the transfer of benefits feature. DTM 09-003, dated 22 June 2009 required the Military Departments to provide and document individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04914
The from and to dates on his NA Form 13038, Certificate of Military Service, be corrected to reflect 15 Sep 49 through 14 May 57. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial of the applicants request pertaining to his NA Form 13038 indicating the applicant has not exhausted all available...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04917
On 15 Jul 13, his commander requested he be reinstated to the grade of E-3; however, the commander relied upon incorrect information concerning how much time he had to wait before submitting the request, and therefore failed to submit it on time. The applicants commander and first sergeant submitted letters of support for the applicant requesting the Board restore the applicants rank of E-3 with an effective date of rank of 16 May 13. However, if the Board votes to grant this request, as...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04925
In addition, prior to his submission to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR); DFAS must establish if there is a debt, notify him of the debt, and provide the course of actions available to him to resolve the issue. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPA recommends that once a debt has been...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04933
In spite of this, her profile allowed her to perform crunches, but after getting another note from her doctor, the Deployment Availability Working Group (DAWG)1 threw it out and agreed with her cardiologist that all timed events were dangerous. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicants commander provides a memorandum, dated 13 Mar 2014, to serve as his invalidation...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04934
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04934 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 2 Dec 80, the applicant was discharged for Misconduct Drug Abuse Board Waiver with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions) in the grade of airman first class. Should the applicant provide evidence pertaining...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04939
Once her evaluation was complete, her medical provider indicated on the AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, that her medical condition prevented her from passing the Abdominal Circumference (AC) component of the test and precluded her from obtaining an overall passing score. DPSIM references AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program AFGM 5 (dated 3 Jan 13) stating that while the applicant had a documented medical condition that precluded her from passing, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04948
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicant request to change her separation code. The correct RE code is 2C, which denotes involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service, as required by AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the United States Air Force, chapter 3, based on her entry-level separation with an uncharacterized character of service. AFPC/DPSOY will provide the applicant with a corrected copy...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04949
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04949 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His AF Form 910, Enlisted Performance report (EPR) (AB thru TSgt), rendered for the period 19 Jun 2012 thru 18 Jun 2013, be corrected or declared void and removed from his records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04955
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief by not first filing an appeal of her OPR through the Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB) under the provisions...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04961
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04961 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits (TEB) to his dependents while on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04962
In addition, personnel serving in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia in direct support of operations in Vietnam during the same time period were also eligible for the VSM. In accordance with Public Law 107-314, § 542, the AFEM, for participation in Operation FREQUENT WIND, may be exchanged for the Vietnam Service Medal. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04964
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04964 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Vietnam Service medal (VSM) and any other awards that he may be eligible for. To be eligible, a service member must have served on TDY for 30 consecutive or 60 non-consecutive days. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The application was not timely filed and it would...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04966
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04966 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Block 11, Primary Specialty, be amended to reflect Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) T2A573A, Instructor, 2005 to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04973
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request for the AFCM, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04974
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04974 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be awarded an enlistment bonus for her Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC)/7-skill level and she be awarded the rank of airman first class. The applicant initialed and signed the DD Form 1966 continuation sheet that states both Stripes for Unit Bonus Skills and Enlisting with Stripes for: sections were...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04980
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04980 COUNSEL: NONE (DECEASED SERVICE MEMBER) HEARING DESIRED: NO (APPLICANT) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The service members records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for spouse coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). On 18 Oct 98, the service member submitted his ARPC...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04986
On 31 Aug 13, the applicant was relieved from active duty and retired from the Air Force with a reason for separation of voluntary retirement: maximum service or time in grade; in the grade of TSgt. §l407(f)(3), Special Rule for Enlisted Members, applies and should authorize him a higher amount of retirement pay. A review of the applicant's record indicates that as of the retirement date, 1 Aug 13 [sic], he was not promoted to a higher grade following his reduction in 2013, and was retired...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04987
and paragraph 4.2.2.2 "The provider will specify the length of time required for physical limitations. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04995
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04995 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT NDICATED APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be amended to reflect his temporary duty (TDY) assignments to Thailand, Guam, (Hawaii, Philippines) - Administratively Corrected, and Okinawa. A review of his records and documentation submitted failed to provide any documents that substantiate...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04998
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04998 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited $5399.01 for an overseas pay deduction. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-IND recommends denial indicating the applicant has not exhausted all of his administrative remedies. In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05006
According to documentation provided by the applicant, on 20 Jun 13, the applicant requested removal of the contested OPR to the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB); however, her request was denied. Based on our review of the applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we are not persuaded that the contested report is not a true and accurate assessment of her performance and demonstrated potential during the specified time period or that the comments contained in the report...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05007
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05007 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be issued a DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, reflective of his continuous honorable reserve service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05014
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05014 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Post 9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) be reestablished based on the contract she signed in Jun 10 and the remaining Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) for the TEB be waived. In Jun 10, when she was approved for the Post 9/11 GI Bill TEB, she incurred a four-year ADSC of 24 Jun 14 (HYT for...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05015
We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends denial stating they were unable to confirm Foreign Service in Southwest Asia. However, after a thorough review of the evidence presented, the Board majority believes the applicant more likely than not participated in Operation DESERT SHIELD from 24 August 1990 to 31 October 1990. While the applicant has not provided a copy of the travel voucher for this TDY, the Board majority finds the evidence presented sufficient to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05020
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05020 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: As amended, he receive medical continuation orders (MEDCON) for the period 4 Oct 12 through 1 Dec 13. Effective 6 Jul 12, under Special Order R-9000170, dated 8 Aug 12, the applicant was placed on MEDCON orders through 3 Oct 12. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05023
DPTT states they should have given the former service member an opportunity to correct the ARPC Form 123 he submitted at the time he made his election. Title 10 Subsection 1448 (a) (3) (A) and Section IX on the form, A married person who is eligible to provide standard annuity may not without the concurrence of the persons spouse elect not to participate in the Plan. ARPC failed to notify the service member to make corrections and updated his election in error. Exhibit F. Affidavits,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05024
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFD recommends denial indicating the preponderance of evidence reflects that no error or injustice occurred during the disability process or at the time of separation. The applicant was evaluated by the PEB on 27 Mar 91,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05025
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When she was discharged from the Air Force, the control roster action had already expired. On the same date, the applicants commander non- selected her for reenlistment. On 4 Apr 14, AFPC/DPSOA informed the applicant that after a thorough review of her personnel records, they discovered that her RE Code of 4I was incorrect and should be 2X (First-term, second- term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP) based on her...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05028
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDE recommends the applicant file an appeal through the Evaluation Reports Appeals Board (ERAB). The Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is the highest level of appeal within the Department of the Air Force. The Air Force Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) has reviewed this application and noted the applicant has not filed an appeal through the Evaluation Reports Appeals Board (ERAB).
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05034
DPSOA states the RE code 2C is required based on the entry level separation with uncharacterized character of service and the applicant does not provide any evidence of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05035
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05035 ANTHONY B. CACHAPERO COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that on 31 Dec 06, he was released from active duty and retired, rather than discharged. The applicants active duty service does not meet the 20 years required to qualify for retirement. A representative from the AFPC Service Dates Verification office...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05039
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05039 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Date of Rank (DOR) to the grade of major (O-4) be changed to 19 November 2012 and his Promotion Effective Date (PED) to 30 March 2013. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was promoted to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05042
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial of the applicants request to set aside her GCM conviction, as it pertains to Charge I, making a false official statement, and its specifications. Further, we believe the applicants record should be corrected to show that on 3 February 2011, the date after she was released from MSR until 6 September 2013, the date the AFCCA affirmed the findings and sentence, she was on appellate leave without pay and points. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05049
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDE recommends denial. Under the provisions of AFI 36-2603, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR), the applicants request has been examined and forwarded through pertinent administrative procedures which are required prior to referral to the AFBCMR. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05050
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the Air Force Offices of Primary Responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant elected SBP spouse coverage upon his retirement on 1 Aug 75. They opine that if the DFAS advisory is correct that the death of the former spouse precludes the plan participant...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05052
In support of his contentions, he submits a Primary Care Manager Memorandum dated 8 Jul 13, recommending the contested FA be invalidated and noting the applicant was cleared to retake the FA within 10 duty days, due to a pending profile; a Duty Limiting Condition Report (AF Form 469), dated 8 Jul 13, and a Fitness Assessment Score Sheet, dated 15 Jul 13. The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 31 Jan 14 88.00 Satisfactory 15 Jul...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05054
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05054 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded. Should the applicant provide additional information, e.g., post-service documentation to support his claim, we would be willing to reconsider his request. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05056
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05056 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Each retired member of the Air Force is entitled to be advanced on the retired list to the highest grade in which they served on active duty satisfactorily as determined by...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05057
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05057 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 22 Aug 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). In support of his appeal the applicant submits; medical documentation from his visit to the emergency room...