AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04605
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04605 XXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 12 Sep 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Mar...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04606
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04606 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits (TEB) to his dependents while on active duty. The applicant could have requested to transfer his benefits as early as 1 Aug 09, but would have incurred a four-year active duty service commitment (ADSC) if he had done so. While...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04607
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04607 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge be upgraded. On 15 November 1983[sic], the Air Force Court of Military Review determined that the findings and sentence were correct in law and fact. We note this Board is without authority to reverse, set aside, or otherwise expunge a court-martial conviction.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04620
Even if it is concluded the SGLI coverage is limited to the amount that was in effect on the date of his death, there is substantial evidence of an error or injustice as there was no counseling on SGLI by the Physical Evaluation Board Liaison Officer (PEBLO) during the pre- separation counseling process. In a letter dated 15 Jun 11, the Office of Service Members Group Life Insurance (OSGLI) advised the applicant that the coverage was based on the amount in effect at the time the decedent...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04621
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04621 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code 2C, (Approved Honorable Involuntary Separation or Entry Level Separation), on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to a 1 to allow him to reenlist in the Air Force. The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04624
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04624 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His appointment into the Air Force Reserve be changed from 28 Nov 12 to 16 Oct 12 to eliminate his break-in-service. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Through no fault of his own, due to a delay in processing the scroll at the Office of the Secretary of Defense (SECDEF), he unjustly incurred a break-in-service between his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04626
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04626 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: No ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 23 Jun 10 and 28 Aug 13, be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The letter supports his request to remove his 23 Jun 10 FA from his record due to a...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04629
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04629 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty be corrected to reflect the following medals: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The RVNCM is awarded to members of the United States Armed Forces who, between 1 Mar 61 and 28 Mar 73, served for...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04638
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/SG does not recommend relief in the form of returning the applicant to active duty status. The complete BCMR Medical Consultants evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 15 May 2014, copies of the Air Force and BCMR Medical evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 28 April 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04639
He believes he should have received an honorable discharge from the Academy due to his prior service and been allowed to complete his enlistment with ANG. The applicant received an honorable discharge from the ANG; however, his DD Form 214 only characterizes his service time as a basic cadet and not any previous service that he had already been separated. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04641
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04641 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The decedents DD Form 214, Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States, be amended to reflect award of the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM). Based on a review of the applicants official military personnel records, DPSID was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04642
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04642 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to conclude that his contributions to his community since leaving the service are...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04645
However, there is no evidence in the applicants submission or his military personnel records that indicates he was assigned to a unit that earned the PUC. The AFOR-LT was authorized on 12 Oct 80, to be awarded to Air Force and Air Force Reserve members credited with completion of an overseas tour on or after 1 Sep 80. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends denial of the applicants request for the PUC, indicating there is no evidence he was assigned to a unit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04646
A complete copy of the AFBCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial of the applicants request to change her name on the DD Form 214, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. However, after a thorough review of the evidence provided, we cannot conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04647
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty; Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) rating decision and extracts from his military personnel records. On 26 Jul 89, the recommendation for discharge was approved by the discharge authority. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04651
Specifically, the Procedural Guidance Message was not properly followed at the time of the original allegation submitted by a recruit. He understands that an Article 15, NJP is rarely set aside, unless it is in the best interest of the Air Force. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04654
AFBCMR BC-2013-04654 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , , be corrected to show that the DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 31 December 1977 retirement, be, and is hereby...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04655
DPAPP states that after a review of his master personnel records and submitteddocumentation, they were unable to find any documentation to substantiate his Foreign Service time was in Vietnam. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Forcerelating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he served bootson-the-ground in the Republic of Vietnam in 1968. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04655 in Executive...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04663
In his request, the applicant indicated that he understood if his request was approved that he may be discharged with a UOTHC discharge and that he may be deprived of Veteran benefits. The applicant was discharged from active duty in the grade of technical sergeant effective 28 October 1988 with a UOTHC discharge under the authority of Air Force Regulation 39-10. ________________________________________________________________ _ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04664
On 20 Feb 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), stating There was not enough or specific details of the medical condition provided from the applicants medical provider. In accordance with (IAW) guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_ Fitness Program AFGM4&5 (26 Jun 13 & 3 Jan 13), Attachment 1, Section 10, If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04665
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04665 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be retroactively promoted to the grade of staff sergeant (SSgt, E-5) effective Jul 13. AFI 36-2502, Airman Promotion/Demotion Programs, paragraph 1.11, states airmen selected for promotion to the grade of SSgt must complete in-residence...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04666
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04666 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 3 year and 25 month reenlistment be changed to a 5 year reenlistment and his entitlement to a Zone B, Multiple 7.0, Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for three years, be changed to 5 years. The applicant was not eligible to cancel his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04673
On 29 Jul 83, the applicant was furnished an Honorable discharge due to the expiration of his term of active obligated service, but continued to serve on and off in both the Air Force Reserve and the Texas Air National Guard. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04674
The applicant underwent an MEB on 4 Feb 97, but was returned to duty by the IPEB in Apr 97. Under these circumstances, if a service member undergoes an MEB [specifically if the MEB narrative summary is dictated] within the 12 months of an approved retirement or retention control point, the service member enters a presumptive period during which he is presumed fit to return to duty. While the applicant argues that he is the victim of an injustice due to the Air Forces failure to timely...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04680
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. However, the applicants dates of service were well prior to the effective date of the AFOR and he is therefore not eligible. Instead, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04681
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04681 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His active duty service commitment (ADSC) extension from the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) begin January 10, the month he originally transferred his educational benefits to his family. STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to the applicants military personnel records he was serving on active...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04682
The applicants last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 30 Oct 13 82.75 Exempt Satisfactory 28 Aug 13 32.60 32/0.00(1-mile walk) Unsatisfactory *13 Aug 13 71.75 Exempt Unsatisfactory 13 Feb 13 87.00 Exempt Satisfactory 7 Aug 12 80.20 15:52/44.10 Satisfactory * Contested FA A similar request was denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) on 14 Feb 14 on the basis of no letter from the commander to invalidate the Fitness Assessment. Also, no AF Form...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04683
Although, one of his performance reports indicates a TDY to Southeast Asia, it does not reflect an exact location. The evidence provided by the applicant reflects that he served on a variety of TDY assignments in Southeast Asia and in England; however, actual locations are not recorded on the DD Form 214, rather IAW AFI 36-3202, Separation Documents, Foreign Service time is reflected on the DD Form 214 in years, months, days. In view of the above, we find no basis to recommend granting...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04685
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04685 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to a 10 percent increase in retired pay due to his being a recipient of the Airman's Medal (AmnM). The applicant believes the Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application because he only recently discovered that all members who receive the AmnM...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04686
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: His TDY to Southeast Asia was in Vietnam. Therefore, in view of the fact that applicant has provided a copy of travel orders that appear to substantiate the noted three-month deployment to Southeast Asia was in the Republic of Vietnam, we believe corrective action is warranted. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04694
The applicants complete submission including: MFR fitness assessment letter, AF 469 for time period of assessment, AF 469 for assessment with passing score, medical documentation, and PT score sheet history is at Exhibit A. On 17 Dec 13, the applicants request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) citing that the member was tested within his AF 469 profile. In this respect, we note the AF Form 469 and AF Form 422 which indicate a medical condition...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04695
Another dependent child was born on 4 December 1981 after the decedents retirement. DPFFF states there is no evidence of Air Force error; however, to preclude an injustice, they recommend the record be corrected. The members record should be corrected to reflect he elected spouse and child coverage based on full retired pay effective 1 August 1980, and his son is permanently incapable of self- support.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04704
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04704 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect the following awards: 1. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial for...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04713
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04713 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 20 Aug 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). In this regard, the Center Director does not support the extended time permitted to take the test, but concurred...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04714
He also provided a memorandum from the medical provider dated 01 Jul 13, that validated he had a medical condition that precluded him from passing the 19 Jun 13 FA and then was issued an AF Form 469. In regards to the FA dated 19 Jun 13, we recognize the letter from his medical provider, which states that a medical condition prevented him from passing. Furthermore, the applicant contends that since the FAs dated 31 July 12 and 28 Dec 12 now reflect a passing score in AFFMS and the FAs...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04716
The wing commander reviewed the case and recommended the 21 AF/CC approve the applicants request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial and ordered that he be discharged with an UOTHC discharge. According to AFHQ Form 0-2077, Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) Hearing Record dated 6 Jun 13, the applicant was offered, but declined, a personal appearance before the board and requested that the review be completed based on the available service record. The AFDRB noted that if...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04717
A list of the applicants last 5 FAs is as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating *22 Jul 13 18.88 35/0.00 Unsatisfactory 25 Mar 13 59.63 38/47.70 Unsatisfactory 10 Sep 12 79.78 39/49.80 Satisfactory 24 Feb 12 78.33 41/47.20 Satisfactory 19 Aug 11 86.00 44/52.40 Satisfactory *Contested FA An AF Form 108, dated 4 Sep 13, signed by his medical provider, states the member has been evaluated and has a medical condition precluding the achievement of a passing score. On 20 Feb 14, a similar...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04720
The Airman may use one hand to initially assist the tester in anchoring the tape measure to the body, but must remove the hand from the tape measure before the official measurement is recorded. The tester will ensure tape is parallel to the floor at the level of the landmark (bottom edge of the tape just contacts landmark), is snug, but does not compress the bare skin. The tester will record this value as the AC measurement.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04721
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04721 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded. We have considered the applicant's overall quality of service, the special court-martial conviction which precipitated the discharge, and the seriousness of the offense to which convicted, and having...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04727
Also, there was no indication the commander wanted to invalidate the Fitness Assessment. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request stating the applicant did not provide specific physical limitations as set by a medical provider. While the applicant has provided a letter from her medical provider indicating she had a medical condition, she has not met her burden of proving the contested FA...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04729
Service RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04729 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code "2C" (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without service characterization of service) be changed to allow him to reenter military service. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial noting the applicant has not provided any evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04732
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04732 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Specifically, he was told by his counsel at the time not to address the political conditions that surrounded the fight between the local MPF and his unit at the time. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, the applicant has not provided any evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04733
On 24 Jun 09, the applicant declined a waiver to stay in the Air Force and was processed for entry level separation with an uncharacterized character of service. The complete BCMR Medical Consultants evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 18 Aug 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit F). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04735
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04735 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his application because he never knew he was able to receive his medical record nor did he know about the existence of the Board. The complete SGPA evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04737
The letter of notification indicated the applicant had a right to consult with legal counsel and that he had a right to appear before an administrative discharge board. He subsequently submitted a request for a conditional waiver of administrative discharge board proceedings, provided he receive no less than a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Jun 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04742
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04742 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. He did not receive any help or counseling. In a response to a request for post-service information, the applicant provides an e-mail dated 24 Jul 14 which states he...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04749
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04749 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reduction in grade to senior airman (E-4) as a result of his Article 15 punishment be withdrawn or suspended and his grade of staff sergeant (E-5) be reinstated. On 7 May 13, the general-court martial convening authoritys staff judge advocate concluded the NJP record was compliant with applicable regulations. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04754
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. However, per the applicant's request, he was not eligible for reenlistment at the time of discharge which would support the RE code 4I. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant notes that the statement in the advisory opinion under the discussion section, indicating that he chose...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04756
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04756 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The following blocks on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 1 Jun 01 retirement be changed: 1. Recommend correcting the Security Forces AFSC and title for his DD Form 214, Block 11 to reflect "3P051, Security Forces Journeyman" vice "81150, Security...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04758
Neither commander indicated that deviations from the instruction were authorized or made for needs of the Air Force. Instead, these commanders confirm that AETCI 36-2205, Volume 4, dated 1 June 2009, was closely followed throughout the training Air Force. Instead, A3F follows with another general assertion that chain-ofcommand oversight and management is essential to the aircraft assignment process and that the wing commander makes the final decision on the best match of student skill,...