AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04441
On 20 Feb 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), stating there was not enough or specific details of the medical condition provided from the applicants medical provider. A list of the applicants last 10 FAs is as follows: Date Composite Score Sit-Ups Rating 5 Feb 14 82.00 Exempt Satisfactory 19 Jun 13 79.00 Exempt Satisfactory 25 Feb 13 85.00 Exempt Satisfactory *27 Dec 12 23.50 39/0.00 Unsatisfactory 25 Jun...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04456
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. This award is an award of a foreign government, which must be officially accepted in order for it to be recorded in a members official...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04458
His former spouse has been receiving a portion of his military retirement and remained eligible to be the beneficiary of his SBP up until her subsequent marriage. The correct date of marriage is 7 Dec 04. Neither the applicant nor his current spouse dispute the fact that his first former spouse is the rightful beneficiary of the SBP.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04459
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04459 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His AF IMT 911, Senior Enlisted Performance Report (MSgt thru CMSgt), Section III, Evaluation of Performance, Block 3, Leadership, with a close-out date of 10 October 2005, be changed from Highly Effective Leader to Exceptionally...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04462
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04462 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of separation (DOS) from active duty be adjusted to reflect the day before his Reserve appointment date in order to remove a break-in-service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04463
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. Service members were briefed and required to make an election prior to completing 18 years of service. The service member retired on 1 Jan 63.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04468
Finally, the applicant did not provide any additional supporting documentation to consider, i.e., commanders invalidation, AF Form 422, etc. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request to void and remove the FAs dated 22 Feb 11, 1 Mar 11, and 22 Jun 11. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM and AFPC/DPSIDE evaluations is at Exhibit B and Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04469
On 14 Feb 14, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) directed that the applicants pertinent AFFMS records be updated to reflect the FAs dated 14 Dec 10, 2 Sep 11, and 1 Dec 11 be removed. The applicant provided medical documentation supporting his contention that his condition precluded him from attaining passing scores on the contested FAs and also provided two substitute reports signed by all of the original evaluators with memorandums supporting his request to substitute the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04471
As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). As such, the only issue before this Board is the Letter of Reprimand (LOR) the applicant received for the FA failure. Should the applicant provide such evidence, we would be willing to reconsider her request.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04472
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04472 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected as follows: Item 7a, Place of Entry into Active Duty, be changed from Albuquerque, NM to Houston, TX; Item 12a, Date Entered Active Duty This Period, be changed from 1977 April 11 to 1969 May 05. APPLICANT CONTENDS...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04477
She took another FA on 16 September 2011, receiving a score of 82.10, failing the sit-up component of the FA. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 5 September...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04481
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04481 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Change the date he was gained into the Air Force Reserve in DEERS to 2 Jul 13 to eliminate his break-in-service. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Through no fault of his own, due to a delay in...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04485
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04485 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded four years of constructive service credit (CSC) for earning his PhD in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (TAM). However, regardless of whether or not the applicants PhD adds adjunctive skill to his primary specialty, he cannot be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04487
TSGLI pays a monetary benefit from $25,000 to $100,000 for covered losses that are incurred by the member as a result of a traumatic injury. The uniformed service will certify whether a servicemember, at the time of the traumatic injury, was insured under SGLI and whether they have sustained a qualifying loss. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04494
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04494 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed $518.55 for tuition assistance (TA). We note the applicant was notified that reimbursement action was pending due to an unsatisfactory grade; however, the applicant has provided evidence that she successfully completed the course in question. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04499
It is awarded to all Air Force service members who, after 1 Jan 1963, qualify as "expert" in small-arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request for the SAEMR. Upon final Board decision, administrative correction of his official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOR.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04500
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04500 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be changed to a medical discharge. In consideration of the appeal for a medical discharge, the reviewer must evaluate whether a medical or mental health condition was unfitting at the time of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04502
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty; Block 14, Military Education, be amended to show Basic Military Training (BMT) Aug 2000. (Administratively Corrected) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of his discharge, he received a 10 percent disability rating. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFD recommends denial of the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04503
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial indicating the applicant never applied for TEB prior to retirement. While she argues that a change to the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) somehow makes her the victim of an injustice, the burden of proof of an error or injustice rests with an applicant and we...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04510
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04510 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Retention/Retirement Year Ending (RYE) in 2002 be credited with additional retirement points to reflect a satisfactory year toward retirement. STATEMENT OF FACTS: During the RYE 11 Jun 02, the applicant was credited with five active duty points, 24 Inactive Duty Training (IDT) points, 15 membership points,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04512
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04512 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late fathers under other than honorable conditions discharge (UOTHC) be upgraded to an honorable discharge. The applicant is requesting an upgrade of her late fathers discharge, contending that his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge was based solely on the fact that he was seen entering...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04516
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04516 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, blocks 19a/b be corrected to show his current address and current spouse and address. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR),...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04517
The applicants complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial of the applicants request for reentry into active duty service due to a disqualifying skin disorder and recommends the change in the RE code to 2C. A medical progress note on 21 May 13 documents a diagnosis of atopic dermatitis, bilateral peri-orbital region, and indicates that...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04523
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04523 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect that he was released from active duty on 22 Oct 64, instead of 22 May 64. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04524
On 12 Dec 88, the action was found to be legally sufficient and the discharge authority concurred with the commanders recommendation and directed the applicants general (under honorable conditions) discharge. On 1 Jun 90, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicants request for an upgrade of his discharge. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 24 Jun 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04530
It is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who, after 1 July 1958, participated in designated United States military operations, United States operations in direct support of the United Nations, or United States operations of assistance for friendly foreign nations. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04532
She was informed by the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) Education Office that her separation code needs to be changed to reflect COG so the DVA can consider her eligibility for the MGIB. She was advised that the DVA will only consider her application if her separation code is changed to COG. She voluntarily separated under the FY04 Force Shaping Program; was offered the MGIB prior to separating and wants to use the benefit she paid into. However, according to the DVA letter dated...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04538
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04538 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). The AFCM is awarded to members of the armed forces of the United States, below the grade of colonel and foreign military personnel, who, while serving in any capacity with the Air Force after 28...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04546
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04546 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04547
The AFDRB concluded the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process. The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He is currently being seen by yet another psychologist whose opinion is that he was never...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04548
According to the applicants AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force (REGAF)/AIR Force Reserve (AF Reserve)/Air National Guard (ANG), dated 25 Jun 13, the applicant requested cancellation of her 26 months extension for the purpose of immediate reenlistment in order to receive a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04550
AFBCMR BC-2013-04550 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , , be corrected to show that the DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 28 November 2011 separation,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04551
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04551 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Referral Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), rendered for the period of 21 Jun 12 through 20 Jun 13, be voided or removed from his military personnel records. In accordance with AFI 36-2406, Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Systems, chapter 10, paragraph 10.1.1: The Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04552
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04552 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) be incorporated into her records and she receives Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) Position Vacancy (PV) promotion to lieutenant colonel (O-5). Per para 2.7.2...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04553
However, the deceased former member was married to someone other than the applicant at the time of his death. On 6 Jun 02, the deceased former member made an RCSBP election for Option C, Immediate Annuity for spouse only coverage. The applicant claimed that the deceased former member assured her several times that he had designated her as a former spouse under RCSBP, but the required action was not accomplished in compliance with law.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04554
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04554 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, section 18, Remarks, reflect that he entered the Air Force in the Delayed Enlistment Program (DEP) in May 75. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04560
In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of his referral OPR and rebuttal, FEB Findings and Recommendations and various other documents associated with his request. Air Force policy is that an evaluation report is accurate as written when it becomes a matter of record. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. _____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 2 Sep 14, a copy of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04566
He be entitled to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V). AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants requests for entitlement to the VSM, RVNGC w/P, Air Force Overseas Ribbon - Long Tour, AFOUA w/V and the PUC. Upon the final Board decision, administrative correction of the applicant's official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOY.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04570
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPAA recommends granting the applicants request noting a review of her records indicates she met all the qualifying criteria for the ACP (ARP) during the original eligibility period. At the time she submitted her signed FY12 ACP contract, a member of the administrative staff told her...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04576
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04576 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The words 2008 Air Force Junior. Should the Board grant relief, the provided corrected citation should be used to correct the applicants decoration. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reiterates that her previous citation did not list her Air Force level Training Manager of the Year award.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04581
AFI 36-3202, Separation Documents is the governing directive for the DD Form 214 and it directs the name on the DD Form 214 be recorded as listed on the military members DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document-Armed Forces of the United States. In instances where a name change is effective after the publication of a DD Form 214, the applicants provide those agencies providing the benefit/entitlement or service their DD Form 214 as prepared and show legal documentation to explain the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04583
On 13 Jun 88, the action was found to be legally sufficient and, on 20 Jun 88, the discharge authority concurred with the commanders recommendation and directed the applicants general (under honorable conditions) discharge. On 23 Jun 88, the applicant was furnished a general (under honorable conditions) discharge for misconduct other serious offenses and was credited with 8 months and 25 days of total active service. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04584
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04584 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to show she transferred her Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits (TEB) to her dependents while on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04586
He was not made aware that there were follow-up actions to his TEB submission until he received an email from the TEB office in July 2013. The applicants contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04589
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04589 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions) discharge or honorable. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Based on his earlier faithful service to the Air Force for 16 years, he feels he served his country with more outstanding service than the way he represented the uniform the last...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04591
Thus, while the applicant has received compensation ratings from the DVA, the military Disability Evaluation System, operating under Title 10, United States Code (USC), can by law only offer compensation for those service incurred diseases or injuries which specifically rendered a member unfit for continued active service and were the cause for career termination; and then only for the degree of impairment present at the time of separation and not based on future occurrences. It could not...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04592
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04592 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His active duty service commitment (ADSC) for his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) be changed to 21 Apr 11, instead of 30 Apr 15. On 20 May 13, more than two years after extending his enlistment for TEB, AFPC notified him that the TEB transfer did not occur because he did not sign the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04594
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04594 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His referral Officer Performance Report (OPR), rendered for the period of 8 Jul 2008 through 23 Feb 2009, be voided from his officer selection record (OSR), or alternatively, the push line (part IV, line 6) of the OPR in question be redacted. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04596
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDE recommends the applicant submit an AF Form 948, Application for Correction/Removal of Evaluation Reports, with all required supporting documentation, through the vMPF Evaluation Appeals, as he has not exhausted his administrative remedies, prior to seeking relief from the Board. The first avenue of relief is through the Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB). Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDE, dated 17 April 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04602
Additional Specification: At diverse times between 13 Mar and 26 Mar 80, he wrongfully used marijuana while confined in the Base Detention Facility as an adjudged prisoner. On 12 Dec 80, the applicant was furnished a UOTHC discharge for misconduct drug abuse and was credited with 2 years, 5 months, and 16 days of total active service. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...