AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04280
This board is used to determine, which active duty members who have been twice nonselected for promotion (and who would otherwise be discharged or retired under Title 10 USC 632) will be retained based on the needs of the Air Force. The selective continuation process is not a force shaping board, but a product of nonselection for the second time that can result in separation from the Air Force. Counsel argues that the governing DoDI 1320.08 provision requires that officers within 6 years...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04281
It is the date that officers selected for continuation would have been continued. The selective continuation process is not a force shaping board, but a product of nonselection for the second time that can result in separation from the Air Force. Counsel argues that the governing DoDI 1320.08 provision requires that officers within 6 years of retirement be offered continuation unless they have derogatory information in their record, which the applicant did not.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04282
It is the date that officers selected for continuation would have been continued. The selective continuation process is not a force shaping board, but a product of nonselection for the second time that can result in separation from the Air Force. Counsel argues that the governing DoDI 1320.08 provision requires that officers within 6 years of retirement be offered continuation unless they have derogatory information in their record, which the applicant did not.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04283
It is the date that officers selected for continuation would have been continued. The selective continuation process is not a force shaping board, but a product of nonselection for the second time that can result in separation from the Air Force. Counsel argues that the governing DoDI 1320.08 provision requires that officers within 6 years of retirement be offered continuation unless they have derogatory information in their record, which the applicant did not.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04284
It is the date that officers selected for continuation would have been continued. The selective continuation process is not a force shaping board, but a product of nonselection for the second time that can result in separation from the Air Force. Counsel argues that the governing DoDI 1320.08 provision requires that officers within 6 years of retirement be offered continuation unless they have derogatory information in their record, which the applicant did not.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04285
This board is used to determine, which active duty members who have been twice nonselected for promotion (and who would otherwise be discharged or retired under Title 10 USC 632) will be retained based on the needs of the Air Force. The selective continuation process is not a force shaping board, but a product of nonselection for the second time that can result in separation from the Air Force. Counsel argues that the governing DoDI 1320.08 provision requires that officers within 6 years...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04286
It is the date that officers selected for continuation would have been continued. The selective continuation process is not a force shaping board, but a product of nonselection for the second time that can result in separation from the Air Force. Counsel argues that the governing DoDI 1320.08 provision requires that officers within 6 years of retirement be offered continuation unless they have derogatory information in their record, which the applicant did not.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04287
It is the date that officers selected for continuation would have been continued. The selective continuation process is not a force shaping board, but a product of nonselection for the second time that can result in separation from the Air Force. Counsel argues that the governing DoDI 1320.08 provision requires that officers within 6 years of retirement be offered continuation unless they have derogatory information in their record, which the applicant did not.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04289
Fourth, any criteria set by the War Department are just not applicable to this case. The OER is clearly an official record, and it clearly states that the decedent had been recommended for a DFC. This case is not like others where the applicant seeks the award of a DFC where the only evidence was the applicant's statement that he was told by his commander that he would be recommended for a DFC.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04290
Although his retirement date was prior to the 1 Aug 09, Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) start date, he was not given the opportunity to reach 1 Aug 09, because of his HYT. Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post- 9/11 GI Bill, and: Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserves) on the date...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04296
____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 24 Jan 14, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was provided to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). As reflected on his DD Form 214, he completed four years of active duty service and was released on 18 Jun 60 to complete the remainder of his MSO in the Reserves. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04297
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04297 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that his rank at the time of his discharge was Staff Sergeant (SSgt, E-6), instead of Sergeant (Sgt, E-5). The applicants available military personnel records indicate that he entered active duty on 3 May 46. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04298
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04928 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits (TEB) to his dependents on 17 Aug 11. He should be granted the 17 Aug 11 TEB transfer date because he met the requirements by signing the AF Form 4406, Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits Statement of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04300
The applicants complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: After querying the Air Force OPR regarding the applicants case, ARPC/DPAF stated that it is entirely possible the applicants unit was not properly notified of the ACP program. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that competent authority approved his request for an Aviator Continuation...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04309
An entry in his medical records dated 7 Feb 69, reflects a left ankle injury. A detailed personal account of how the injury occurred, medical documentation substantiating he received an injury which required medical treatment at the time the injury occurred, and eyewitness statements from individuals who saw the applicant receive the injury were not provided. There is no medical documentation in his military personnel record to substantiate any injuries he may have received were enemy...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04322
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04322 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicants complete submission, we find no evidence which would persuade us that the applicants records should be corrected to show that he was reinstated to the grade of SSgt. Regarding...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04324
The Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is the highest level of administrative appeal within the Department of the Air Force. The applicant did file an appeal through the Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB) under the provisions of AFI 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluations Reports; however, the ERAB considered the appeal and after a thorough review, it was returned without action due to a lack of corroborating evidence to clearly prove that the lower...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04325
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04325 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Date of Rank (DOR), of his promotion to Major, O-4, be changed from 13 October 2012, to 2 March 2012. He subsequently met another promotion board on 13 October 2013. He was selected and processed for promotion on a later list and was promoted...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04329
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty, be, and hereby is, amended in Block 11, Primary Specialty to add 8M000 Postal for 2 years and 11 months. His DD Form 214, be, and hereby is, amended in Block 11, Primary Specialty to change 3P071 Security Forces to read 19 years and 9 months, instead of 22 years and 10 months. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04330
The AFCM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Air Force after 24 Mar 58, shall have distinguished themselves by meritorious achievement and service. Although the applicant did not provide a copy of the special order awarding the AFCM, we find the signed certificate and citation provided in support of his request sufficient to conclude that he was awarded the AFCM for meritorious service. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04332
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/SGPA recommends denial in regards to the applicant being granted a medical discharge, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the NGB/SGPA evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04336
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04336 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an Honorable. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the applicants general (under honorable conditions) discharge for unsuitability was consistent with the substantive...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04341
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04341 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2C with narrative reason for separation of unsatisfactory performance, be changed to give her an opportunity to reenter the military. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04342
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04342 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be changed to a medical discharge. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Sep 13.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04345
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial of the applicants request to remove the demotion action and restore his rank to Technical Sergeant. Therefore, in view of the fact that we have determined the evidence is sufficient to conclude there was a causal nexus between the medical condition for which the applicant received a disability discharged and his ability to attain passing scores on his FAs, we also believe it is reasonable to conclude...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04348
The Keesler Education Office should have been aware that the TEB can only be accomplished while a member is active duty Air Force. Therefore, in order to preclude the possibility of an injustice to the applicant, the Board recommends the records be corrected as indicated below. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR dated 28 February 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04350
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04350 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04365
In support of her request the applicant provides copies of her AF Form 4406, Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits Statement of Understanding (SOU) and AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force (REGAF) Air Force Reserve (AF Reserve) Air National Guard (ANG). Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) who meets Post- 9/11 GI Bill eligibility requirements and at the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04366
However, if the Boards decision is to grant relief, the applicants records should be corrected to show that on 16 Jan 10, he elected not to resume SBP spouse coverage. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04369
She changed her election and completed a "Corrected Copy" DD Form 2656, Data for Payment of Retired Personnel, to decline SBP coverage. However, her husband's concurrence was dated after her retirement date, invalidating the election. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 31 Jan 13, she elected to decline coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan and her spouse concurred in her election.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04372
STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to an Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) letter, dated 29 Aug 09, the applicant was notified that he had completed the required years of service for entitlement to Reserve retired pay and eligible to participate in the RCSBP. At that time the applicant can choose to decline SBP coverage, however, the applicant will still be responsible for the RCSBP portion of the coverage. The records show that he did not make an election within the required time period...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04379
The applicant contends that, with approval from the Commander, she retested 6 days after the 8 Mar 11 FA, and 18 days after the 19 Apr 12 FA, with a score of 86.20 and 89.00 respectively. If the applicant had provided a memorandum from her commander stating he mandated these FAs (i.e. 14 Mar 11 and 7 May 12) we could have removed the FA retests. While the applicant has provided medical documentation indicating a medical condition and in her response to the Air Force evaluation, submitted...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04382
The staff judge advocate stated that on 22 October 1993, the applicant unconditionally waived his right to an administrative discharge board and requested a general discharge. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 1 November 1993, he was honorably discharged with a narrative reason for separation of Secretarial...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04388
The recoupment of his Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC) scholarship be waived. In addition, the panel considered recoupment of the pro-rata portion of his AFROTC scholarship associated with the unserved portion of his active duty service commitment (ADSC) associated with the scholarship. He did not file an appeal through the Air Force Remissions Board because his notification for his involuntary discharge indicated he should appeal through the AFBCMR.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04392
In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, in the absence of any evidence for us to consider in determining whether or not the applicants activities since leaving the service are sufficient to overcome the misconduct for which he was discharged, we are not inclined to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04393
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04393 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. There is no official documentation in the applicant's military record to verify the applicant participated in the United Nations action in Korea, rendering him ineligible for award of the United Nations Service Medal. We took notice of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04395
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04395 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receives a medical retirement based on his disabilities incurred while on active duty. Based upon the supplied service medical evidence, the Medical Consultant found no medical condition that established a cause and effect relationship with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04398
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04398 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be issued a DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty, and a Uniformed Services Identification Card in conjunction with his separation from the Air Force Reserve. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04400
In addition, personnel serving in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia in direct support of operations in Vietnam during the same time period also were eligible for the VSM. Only members of the United States Armed Forces who meet the criteria established for the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal or the Vietnam Service Medal during the period of service required are considered to have contributed direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam Armed Forces; or, did not complete the length of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04401
His current medical provider requests that his medical records includes a history of receiving shrapnel wounds and that he exhibits scars consistent with shrapnel wounds and further requests that his statement be included as a part of his official medical records. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, stating, in part, that there is no special order, recommendation or signed certificate in the applicant's...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04402
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial. The PH Review Board has the authority (on behalf of the Secretary of the Air Force), to determine a veteran's award of the PH. Each request is considered based on the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04408
His service was terminated by a BCD. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Air Force Office of Special Investigation determined a criminal record does exist. Based on the military justice records in this case and consistent with the decision of the Air Force Court of Military Review, JAJM recommends the Board not grant relief based on any error or injustice with the court- martial process.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04411
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04411 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Title 10 Military Personnel Appropriation (MPA) active duty orders for the period of 1 October 2010, through 30 September 2011 be amended to show the she was continued on active duty Medical Continuation (MEDCON) orders until 31 December 2012. In...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04414
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04414 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 12 Aug 08, 27 Apr 10, 29 Jul l0, 3 Nov l0, and 24 Apr 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 7 May 12 she was medically evaluated, at the request of her...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04415
He was also placed on MEDCON orders from 26 Nov 13 through 7 Mar 14. CMAS also reflects he was placed on MEDCON orders on 16 Sep 10 through 11 Mar 11 for his in the LOD medical condition. From 16 Sep 10 through 11 Mar 11 he was on MEDCON for his right knee, he was released from MEDCON due to medical documentation only reflecting a treatment plan for his left knee.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04416
His TFCSD in his records was incorrectly changed from 15 May 10 to 15 Sep 10 The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPV recommends the applicants request be granted. He was told by...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04418
On 29 Sep 12, according to AFPC/DPFA, the applicant submitted a request for MEDCON orders. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFA recommends denial of the applicants request for an orders extension or point credit, indicating the documentation submitted does not support his potential eligibility for MEDCON orders...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04419
On 5 Nov 70, the applicant requested discharge under Air Force Manual (AFM) 39-12, paragraph 2-78, Request for Discharge for the Good of the Service. On 2 Dec 70, the applicant was furnished an UOTHC discharge and was credited with 2 years, 2 months, and 22 days of total active service. Available Applicant's Master Personnel Records Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 26 Jun 14, w/atch.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04428
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to special order number ACD-349, dated 18 Nov 93, on 28 Dec 93, the applicant was relieved from active duty. The Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) correctly reflects the applicants effective date of retirement as 29 Dec 93. DEERS reflects the applicants retired ID card was issued on 6 Sep 11; however, the ID card issuance itself on 6 Sep 11, did not create her eligibility...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04435
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04435 APPLICANT: COUNSEL: NONE MEMBER: (DECEASED) HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased husbands record be corrected to show that he elected spouse coverage, at the full level, under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP), naming her as beneficiary. ...