AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04871
The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He disagrees with the findings of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility. The letter from his Flight Surgeon and 844th Communications Squadron Executive Director states that he was diagnosed with a medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing fitness score and that he should be exempt from the cardio component...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05000
DPSIM further recommends the fitness assessments dated 27 Sep 11, 30 Dec 11, and 28 Mar 12 be corrected to reflect the applicant was exempt from the waist measurement component of these FAs. The complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He was told he had to participate in the abdominal circumference for the 29 Mar 11 FA, not knowing there was an AF Form 422...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05043
AFBCMR BC-2012-05043 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that on 21 September 2009, 5.2 hours of flight time (primary and combat) were added to the Aviation Resource Management...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05067
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/JA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/JA evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANTS...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05071
The Letter of Counseling (LOC), dated 7 Sep 10; LOC, dated 18 Feb 11; Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 28 Mar 11; LOC, dated 28 Mar 11; and LOC, dated 15 Jun 11 be removed from her official military personnel records. FINDING (As amended by AFGSC/IG): NOT SUBSTANTIATED The applicants commander removed the 18 Feb 11 LOR from the applicants military personnel records as a result of the substantiated finding of reprisal in the AFGSC/IG Report. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOE evaluation is...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05075
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPA recommends denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05082
However, ACC agreed to authorize two years of CED travel orders showing intent to remain through the contract. According to the FY 2010 Air National Guard ACP Policy, members are only eligible to apply " ... for the period of time for the orders in hand." ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that competent authority approved...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05091
________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the deceased service member be corrected to show that on 31 Dec 02, he elected spouse only Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage based on full retired pay. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05091 in Executive Session on...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05093
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05093 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be awarded Non-Commissioned Officer (NCO) status. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05097
A complete copy of the SAF/MRBP evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reiterates his argument that he would have been selected for promotion to master sergeant if credited with the Air Medal. As for the applicants request that he be promoted to the grade of master sergeant (E-7), in view of the fact that we have determined there is no basis to recommend granting the AM, we find...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05107
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05107 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 21 Sep 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant did not provide any evidence his 1.0 mile walk was improperly administered during the FA. The 21 Sep 2012 FA was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05111
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05111 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Narrative Reason for Separation on her DD 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, of Fraudulent Entry Into Military Service/Drug Abuse be removed. On 22 Nov 10, the applicant was furnished an ELS with uncharacterized service...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05118
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/SG recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of a connection between the applicants implanted ICD and any period of duty. The Automated Line of Duty (ALOD) system does not indicate a LOD was ever initiated; however,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05122
AFBCMR BC-2012-05122 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to XXXXXXX., XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued 30 September 1982, Item 13, Decorations,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05140
On 18 Mar 1987, he was discharged from the Air Force with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. On 4 Jan 1989, the applicant submitted a request to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) for an upgrade to his discharge. On 24 Mar 1989, the applicant was notified that the AFDRB considered his application and concluded that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05143
AFBCMR BC-2012-05143 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05156
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05156 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Being released 22 days shy of completing his tour so that he could be eligible in the future seems deliberate and unjust. Other relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05158
He simply requests an upgrade to his BCD based on the circumstances at the time he was court-martialed along with the positive progress he has made since his discharge. As of this date, this office has not received a response. We find no evidence which indicates the applicants service characterization, which had its basis in his court-martial and was a part of the sentence of the military court, was improper or that it exceeded the limitations set forth in the Uniform Code of Military...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05160
There are no extension documents in applicant's records, although the nine month extension is updated in the personnel and finance data systems, the applicant would not have been allowed to receive orders or proceed on assignment without obtaining the required retainability. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05161
She contacted DFAS several times because the deduction out of her retired pay had not been increased and remained the 10 percent as it was when her brother was beneficiary. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-JBJE/CL, Retirement and Annuity Pay, recommend the applicants record be corrected to show that she did not make a subsequent NIP election after the death of her brother. As of this date, no response has been received by this...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05162
A complete copy of the ARPC/DPTT evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Her spouse signed for the notification letter for RCSBP because she was serving her annual tour in Germany. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05183
DPSOR states that based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was appropriately administered and within the discretion of the discharge authority. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC- 2012-05183 in Executive Session on 15 Aug 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05197
AFBCMR BC-2012-05197 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05201
AFBCMR BC-2012-05201 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05203
On 29 May 2012, he completed a masters class using tuition assistance and his ADSC was changed to 26 May 2014. The A1DL complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states A1DL did not address the fact that although the tuition assistance was accepted with the class completed by May 2012 - his ADSC was much further out than it should have been. When he accepted the tuition...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05207
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. DPSIT states that in accordance with 38 USC, Chapter 33, Section 3319(f), an individual...may transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the armed forces when the transfer is executed. The applicant retired from the Air Force on 16 Sep 2005; therefore, she was not eligible to transfer benefits to her dependents since...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05212
There is no evidence or record that either party submitted a valid election to establish former spouse SBP coverage within the first year following their divorce as the law requires. While there is no evidence of an error on the part of the Air Force, it would be in the interest of justice to correct the record to show the applicant submitted a valid request for former spouse and child SBP coverage based on full retired pay, effective 1 Apr 09. While there is no evidence of an Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05218
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP states that the Board should review the applicants records to see if Foreign Service other than what they were able to verify can be determined. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that his AF Form 7, Airman Military Record reflects he was TDY from 28...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05231
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05231 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His referral Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) covering the period 5 Aug 11 through 4 Aug 12 be declared void and removed from his records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05244
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05244 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), rendered for the reporting period 14 Mar 09 through 13 Mar 10, be declared void and removed from her military personnel records. At the time, there were no provisions that authorized the one- mile walk component...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05245
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05245 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His AF Form 3008, Supplement to Enlistment Agreement United States Air Force, be corrected to reflect he elected participation in the Enlisted College Loan Program (ECLRP). He was informed by Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS) personnel to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05247
Option A (Decline to make an election until age 60) the service member declines to make an election at the time of eligibility; however, the service member is provided an opportunity to participate in SBP at age 60. b. Option B (Deferred Annuity) the service member elects RCSBP coverage to begin at age 60. c. Option C (Immediate Annuity) the service member elects for coverage to begin immediately. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05253
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05253 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect award of the following medals: 1. The applicants record will be administratively corrected to reflect award of the VCM, RVNGC w/P, and the AFOUA w/V &2BOLC. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05257
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFMOA/SGHI recommends denial, indicating the applicants initial request for MEDCON orders ended due to him failing to provide further documentation for his medical condition. Additionally, the applicant may have been receiving VA...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05262
AFBCMR BC-2012-05262 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that at the time of his honorable discharge, on 28 June 2005, the narrative reason for his separation was Secretarial...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05265
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05265 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA) score recorded on 19 Jul 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05274
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility which are included at Exhibits C and F. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Had the Air Force known of this condition at the time of his enlistment, the applicant would not have been allowed entry into...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05283
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05283 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His dishonorable discharge be upgraded based on clemency. He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge (DD), forfeiture of all pay and allowances and confinement one year. We find no evidence which indicates the applicants service characterization,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05284
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The law controlling the SBP does not permit the base amount to be changed-lowered or increasedwhen a retired member with spouse or...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05286
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. While we are mindful of the deceased former members service to his country, we do not find the evidence presented by the applicant is...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05304
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05304 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On that same date, the staff judge advocate found the case file legally sufficient and recommended the applicant receive an UOTHC discharge. On 29 Dec 77,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05306
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05306 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. If so, the Board should change his SBP coverage from automatic coverage to child only SBP. If not, the Board should change his SBP coverage from automatic coverage to no coverage due to no eligible beneficiaries.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05310
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05310 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. At the time of his separation, he only had 14 years satisfactory service towards retirement. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05317
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05317 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. (Administratively Corrected) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He is entitled to the Aircrew Member Badge, because his DD Form 214, item 25a [sic] reflects his Air Force Specialty Code...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05318
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05318 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His grade at the time of entry on active duty should have been advanced based on his status as an Eagle Scout. ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was never told that since he...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05322
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05322 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that on 31 Jul 07, he was released from active duty and retired in accordance with the provisions of 10 USC Section 1251, rather than being transferred to the Air Force Reserve. Therefore, the applicant submitted a...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05327
Unable to complete electronic profile at this time but currently in process. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. While we note the comments from AFPC/DPSIM indicating the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05328
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05328 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His WD AGO Form 53-98, Military Record and Report of Separation...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05329
He is not sure if the error was due to his medical retirement and years of service. The complete DPSIT evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05329 in Executive Session on 12 Sep 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Nov 12, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05330
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05330 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation, which reflects Marginal Performer Assigned to Organizational Unit, be changed. His personnel records indicate he requested that his shift commander write a letter concerning his incompetency as a...