AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05334
The documentation on file in the master personnel records supports the basis for discharge to include her character of service and narrative reason for separation. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05342
The Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB) directed that his EPR closing 29 Jun 06 be replaced; however, he should have been provided supplemental promotion consideration for promotion cycles 07E8 and 08E8. Regarding the applicants contention his EPR covering the period 1 Apr 05 through 30 Sep 06, which is only a matter of record because he requested that it replace another report, was in error because it was not signed by his additional rater at the time in violation of AFI 36-2406, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05352
As for his request related to the Air Force Combat Action Medal (AFCAM), we note the applicant has not provided any evidence of actions on his part to obtain the relief he seeks through the proper administrative channels for award of the AFACM. We further note that AFPC/DPSID has verified the applicants entitlement to the Global War On Terrorism Expeditionary Medal (GWOT-E), Global War On Terrorism Service Medal (GWOT-S), Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM), and Air Force Expeditionary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05353
AFBCMR BC-2012-05353 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05354
According to information provided by the applicant, on 16 Mar 06, the DVA evaluated the applicants diagnosis of dysthymia with anxious and granted him a 30 percent disability rating. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibits C and F. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFD recommends denial indicating there was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05356
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Feb 13, for review and comment within 30 days. While the applicant indicates that her ultimate goal in pursuing correction of her records is to serve in the Air National Guard (ANG), the applicant should be aware that our recommendation to correct her...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05357
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2012-05357 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05365
AFBCMR BC-2012-05365 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05366
On 9 Apr 2010, the Secretary of the Air Force determined she would not be advanced to the higher grade of CMSgt when her time on active duty and her time on the retired list totaled 30 years (10 USC § 8964). From the plain language of the statute, she is eligible for advancement on the retired list to the highest grade on active duty served satisfactorily. Her active duty time and her time on the retired list has now reached 30 years and she is eligible to seek and attain her previous rank...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05369
DPSIM states that the applicant provided a memorandum from the Director, Fitness and Sports Complex at Kadena Air Base, Japan which states her staff was aware of the manufacturers guidance that HR monitors can cause erratic readings and have previously separated walkers after crossing the finish line to keep their distance to avoid syncing with other HR monitors worn by other walkers. After he completed the cardio component of the FA, he had a 20 minute argument with three of the FACs and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05379
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request for the AFLSA, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. As for the award of a second RVN Gallantry Cross w/Palm, he argues that since the guidance...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05389
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05389 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The time he was retained in the Inactive Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS) from 31 Dec 97 through 22 Nov 05 be removed. He was also permanently retained in the Inactive Reserve and his record was not reviewed in accordance with...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05391
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request for the SAEMR indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The SAEMR is awarded to all Air Force service members who after, 1 Jan 63, qualified as expert in small...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05393
The SAEMR is awarded to all Air Force service members who, after 1 Jan 1963, qualify as "expert" in small arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun. Upon the final board decision, administrative correction of the applicant's official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOY. We also note the OPR has administratively corrected the applicants records to reflect his entitlement to the PUC, RVNGC w/P, and AFOUA w/V.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05394
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05394 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His total active service time reflected on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to include the time he served in the National Guard. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05395
The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of this case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge process. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 13 August 2013.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05398
DPSOR states that based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include her character of service was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05401
________________________________________________________________ _ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant remembered to comply with the requirement when...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05404
However, an analysis of his records revealed that he should have been awarded the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal (GWOT-E) and Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon (AFESR) with Gold Border (GB) for his deployment to Diego Garcia in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM. Additionally, located within the applicant's military personnel record is Service Medal Award Verification (AF Form 104) dated 5 August 2005, awarding the applicant the GWOT-E and the AFESR w/GB. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05415
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2012-05415 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 17 April 2012, he was furnished an entry-level...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05422
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, stating, in part, that the applicant did not serve in the area of eligibility for 30 consecutive days or 60 non-consecutive days. Unfortunately it cannot be determined whether the applicant meets the eligible criteria for award of the VSM. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, based on a review of the available...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05435
Her DD Form 214 does not reflect any Foreign Service. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 14 Apr 13, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05436
Before issuing the LOR, the OG/CC requested a copy of the LOR purportedly given to the applicant while performing duties at Tyndall AFB since there was no record of the LOR in the applicants personnel file. The OG/CC never received a copy of said LOR and therefore documented the applicants misconduct with the LOR, dated 18 Sep 10. A complete copy of the AFRC/JA evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05437
The applicants date of rank to the grade of airman (E-2) is 17 November 2012. While the applicant successfully completed the RTDP and provided several letters in support of his request, no error or injustice occurred in his case. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05441
Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that: a. If supplemental promotion consideration results in the selection for promotion to the higher grade, immediately after such promotion the records shall be corrected to show that applicant was promoted to the higher grade on the date of rank established by the supplemental promotion and that applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05447
World War II Victory Medal (WWIIVM) The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05448
For a full list of the offenses, please see the commanders notification letter at Exhibit B. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the applicants discharge on the basis of clemency; however, in view of the applicants overall record of service, the numerous infractions which led to his administrative separation and the lack of post-service documentation, we are not persuaded that an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge is warranted on that basis. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05452
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He submitted his original TEB paperwork with a signed Statement of Understanding (SOU) on 24 Nov 09 but for some reason, it did not go through at that time. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05454
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05454 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. In view of the foregoing, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to upgrade the applicants General (Under Honorable Conditions)...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05459
On 9 Aug 04, the 366 LRS/CC, recommended finding "In Line of Duty." The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: If his records are reviewed prior to his deployment to OEF, the Board will see that he was an exemplary airman. His complete response with attachments, is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05467
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05467 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for RCSBP coverage for his spouse. Although the applicant indicated he was not properly advised in regards to his RCSBP option until after the automatic election was made, the RCSBP...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05470
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05470 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) and any additional awards he may be entitled to for his active duty service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05471
Specifically, any member of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 August 2009, eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least six years of service on the date of election and agreed to serve (if applicable) a specified additional period from the date of election, may transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Benefits to their dependents. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05473
DPAPP states that a review of the applicants military service records and documentation submitted failed to substantiate any foreign service time in Vietnam or Laos. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicants complete submission, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the PH, AM, VSM with six Service Stars. Applicant's Military Service Records.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05474
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05474 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Purple Heart (PH) Medal he was awarded in 1968 be reflected on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and he be furnished a corrected PH Certificate with his name spelled correctly. The remaining relevant facts...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05477
The AFAM was authorized by the Secretary of the Air Force on 12 Oct 80 and is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States and foreign military personnel, below the rank of Colonel, after 30 Sep 81, who while serving in any capacity with the United States Air Force, distinguish themselves by meritorious service or achievement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05482
As a result, these charges were later dismissed and should not form the basis of his disenrollment from AFROTC. On 8 November 2011, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the disenrollment action and did not waive his right to a disenrollment investigation. The applicant contends an inadmissible portable breathalyzer test (PBT) that was expunged from his records should not have been used as evidence in his AFROTC disenrollment proceedings.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05483
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05483 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 6 Jun 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicants most recent FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 16 Nov 12 68.00 Unsatisfactory 6 Jun...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05484
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2012-05484 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05486
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2012-05486 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05487
Block 8b, Station Where Separated, of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland, instead of Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 1. The applicants commander indicated the applicant identified himself as eligible for separation under the DOS Rollback program and it was his intention to deny the applicant reenlistment...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05512
The Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) records reflect the applicant remarried on 29 Aug 1998; however, he failed to submit a valid SBP election within the first year of their marriage. The instruction indicates no penalty for failing to enroll all subsequent spouses after retirement. _______________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 29 Aug 2013, under the provisions of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05513
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05513 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (entry-level separation with uncharacterized service) be changed so that he can be eligible for enlistment into the coast guard reserve. On 2 February 1999, the applicant was furnished an Entry-Level Separation with...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05515
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05515 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. In accordance with Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05516
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2012-05516 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05522
The applicant received the appropriate RE code based his being involuntarily discharged with service characterized as general. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 Dec 12, for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05529
AFBCMR BC-2012-05529 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05530
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He believes that certain medical documentation from a civilian orthopedic specialist was intentionally left out of his record when it was reviewed by the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) and the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB). DPSD notes that USAF disability boards must rate disabilities based on the member's condition at the time of evaluation; in essence a snapshot of their condition at that...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05531
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, noting that the applicant has not exhausted all avenues of administrative relief. The complete SAF/PC evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In a rebuttal response, a friend of the applicant submitted additional documents including, copies of 339th Bomb Squadron's Record...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05532
He served four years of total active duty service. DPSIDR states that the applicants official military records were thoroughly reviewed; however, they were unable to locate documentation to verify he served in the area of eligibility for the required period of time for award of the KDSM. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicants contentions, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its...