AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03180
DPSIM notes they queried the applicant for additional medical information with regard to his contention he failed the FA because he was forced to complete a FA when he was not due; however, the applicant failed to respond to their request for additional information. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 29 Oct 12 for review and comment within 30 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03187
AFBCMR BC-2012-03187 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03195
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03195 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 30 Sep 11 and 23 Feb 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends partial approval,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03203
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the request for service in SEA, stating, in part that although they could verify the applicant was TDY to Korea, based on a lack of evidence, they could not confirm any time served in SEA. The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request for award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03203 2
________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant, dated 9 May 13. Exhibit K. Letter, Applicant, dated 2 Jan 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03234
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03234 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). Although the applicants APR, closing 29 May 73, confirms that he was recommended for the AFCM, the applicants records and the documentation he has provided in support of his appeal, do not...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03257
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends the sit-up component of the contested FA reflect "exempt" in the AFFMS. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 29 Aug 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. In this respect, we note that while the applicant requests the entire FA be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03262
On 23 Feb 10, the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council conducted a grade determination and found the applicant did not serve satisfactorily in the higher grade of MSgt within the meaning of Title 10 Section 1372; therefore, he was retired in the grade of TSgt. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, based on the evidence of record and the information provided in support of his appeal, to include the letter from the Wyoming...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03643
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03643 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code 2C, which denotes "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service," be changed to allow his reentry in the military. On 7 Aug 2007, his commander notified him...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03650
After carefully reviewing this application and the evidence provided in support of the appeal, we are not persuaded that the applicants Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 26 Feb 12 should be removed from his records. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Nov 12. Acting Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2012-03650 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03656
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03656 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer an additional 18 months of Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his son. In this respect, while the record reflects the applicant was able to transfer half of the benefit to his eldest son prior to retirement, it...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03669
AFBCMR BC-2012-03669 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 4 December 1989...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03675
AFBCMR BC-2012-03675 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the Fitness Assessment, dated 24 April 2012, be, and hereby is, removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03681
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03681 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded. On 29 Aug 77, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied a similar request by the applicant. _________________________________________________________________ THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03686
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03686 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) test score dated 23 Apr 12, be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). Upon taking the retest, the applicant was again successful in completing his FA as he was in many occasions...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03688
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03688 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. The complete DPSIT evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03692
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03692 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reason for separation (Fraudulent Entry in Military Service) along with the corresponding Separation (SPD) code of JDA be changed to an Erroneous Entry. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03700
Moreover, there has been no showing that he had an unfitting medical condition that would have required his processing through the Military Disability Evaluation System a prerequisite to a medical discharge. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03703
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03703 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 11 Nov 11 [sic] be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03704
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03704 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) tests rendered on 30 Jan 12 and 28 Apr 12 [sic] be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03705
On 2 Jul 09, the ARPC/DEERS Project Office changed her back to Selected Reserve, once again making her eligible for TRICARE. On 22 May 12, the applicant's record was incorrectly updated a third time to Selected Reserve status by the ARPC/DEERS Project Office, and then immediately changed back to the IRR. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03711
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03711 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her date of separation of 1 Jun 04, be changed to a date after 19 Jul 04. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit D). Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Oct 12.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03743
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03743 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 28 Sep 2009, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the applicants request for a discharge upgrade. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03752
The applicant provides no evidence of error or injustice on the part of the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit B. Applicants Master Personnel Records Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 29 Aug 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03753
DPSIM further notes the support memorandum provided by the applicant was not signed by his commander and; therefore, does not confirm its validity. The unsigned memorandum from the applicants commander is noted; however, in the absence of a signature and a copy of his signed fitness score sheet from the FA in question, we find insufficient evidence to warrant disturbing the record. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Feb 13.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03756
DPTT states that in order to transfer to the Retired Reserve, a member must complete a retirement application and submit it to ARPC for approval and processing. Since the applicant was discharged in 2010, he is not eligible to enlist for transfer to the Retired Reserve. By law, 10 U.S.C., Section 12738, once the official notification is issued, Reserve retired pay eligibility cannot be revoked or denied; the entitlement remains in effect even if the member is discharged.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03805
A1K states that on 13 Jul 2010, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) concluded the overall quality of the applicants service was more accurately reflected by a general (under honorable conditions) character of service. He has not provided any new or relevant evidence that warrants favorable consideration of his request. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03842
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03842 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). Retroactive recommendations for awards for individuals beyond the two-year time limitation must be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03848
Notwithstanding the fact the applicant has provided a sworn statement alleging that she was not aware her husband did not elect SBP coverage and AFAFCs failure to retain documentation of that notification, the history transaction annotated in the decedent's record confirms standard procedures regarding the spouse notification requirement was properly accomplished. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03867
The applicants records reflect Atwater, California as the HOR at which he resided prior to entering the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03870
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AETC/SGPS recommends denial of the applicants request to change his reentry (RE) code. The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicants request to change his character of service and narrative reason for separation. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC- 2012-03870...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03929
He was notified of his selection for the BETA III RPA training, and was informed and counseled based on his training allocation notification Reports of Individual Personnel (RIPs), that this training incurred a 36-month ADSC. He accepted the training by signing the training allocation RIPs that reflected a 36-month ADSC and subsequently signed an AF Form 63, Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) Acknowledgement Statement with a three-year ADSC. 2) When he signed his RIPs he was counseled...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03965
On 17 Jul 1995, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was not recommending him for reenlistment in the Air Force. DPSOR states that the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include his separation code was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03968
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03968 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 15 Dec 2010, 15 Mar 2011, and 13 Jun 2011, Unsatisfactory Fitness Assessments (FAs) be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). However, the applicant has not provided similar evidence to support that his FAs should be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03981
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C, D, F, H, I, J and K. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. Further, based on the BOI and a self-obtained polygraph examination, the applicant requested the NJP be set-aside; however, his request was denied. While we note the applicant requests further legal review,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04038
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings. The member had a medical evaluation board on 20 Nov 2008, for atrial fibrillation. The Medical Consultant states that it could not be established that the applicant was unable to reasonably perform his military duties as a result of OSA.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04155
Therefore, they recommend the AC component of the FA dated 31 Jul 2012, be updated to reflect "exempt" in AFFMS. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The facts support his assertion that the entire FA should be removed from his record and that he should be granted the opportunity to re-test immediately. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04158
Based upon the published policy guidance, the fact that he met all eligibility requirements and that the delay in release of the FY12 ACP policy was through no fault of the member, we recommend approval of the above member's request. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 October 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04161
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility and SAF/MRB Legal Advisor attached at Exhibits B and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PF recommends approval. While we note the comments of the SAF/MRB Legal Advisor indicating an applicant must prove by sufficient evidence that he or she is the victim of a serious injustice not...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04166
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04166 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits B and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04171
The narrative reason for separation was NON-SELECTION, PERMANENT PROMOTION. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request to correct his AF Form 709. The complete DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04276
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 16 Apr 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04281
DPAPPO states IAW DoDI 1300.19, DoD Joint Officer Management Program, in order to be appointed a Level II Joint Qualified Officer the officer must accrue 18 joint qualification points or have been awarded full joint duty credit and successfully completed JPME I. A further check of the Joint Officer Management Information System (JMIS) and Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS) verify this fact. The DPSID complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSIM recommends granting relief sought by...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04384
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04384 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Time in Service (TIS) and Time in Grade (TIG) be corrected. On 18 Oct 2011, he enlisted into the Regular Air Force through the Air Force Recruiting Service for a period of 4 years as a non-prior service (NPS) applicant. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04391
AFBCMR BC-2012-04391 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04457
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His records do not indicate that his retirement pay was considered for a 10 percent increase at the time he was awarded the Airmans Medal. Per AFI 26-3203, Service Retirements, Since 1979, enlisted members who have been awarded the Silver Star, the Distinguished Flying Cross for heroism in a noncombat action, or the Airmans Medal have been automatically considered for the additional 10 percent pay...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04467
After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant's complete submission, to include his rebuttal response, the majority of the panel does not find the applicant's arguments or the evidence presented sufficient to conclude that his recall to EAD under 10 USC § 688a was an error on the part of the Air Force or resulted in disparate treatment of the applicant or other Retired Reserve offices subjected to this recall. We note the applicants argument that his recall to EAD...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04553
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04553 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His record be further corrected to account for his denied promotion opportunities to lieutenant colonel and colonel, in that he was not considered by promotion board for which he would have been eligible had he been accessed in the correct rank. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04613
On 27 Mar 12, the AFRICOMs military personnel branch informed the applicant that ARPC/PBP determined his PRF was not considered by the CY11 Lt Col Reserve Promotion Board and of their actions to ensure the officer selection records of all eligible reserves are complete prior to promotion consideration. Therefore, we believe it appropriate to recommend that the OPR be corrected to reflect that the applicant acknowledged its receipt on 12 Jun 11, which will result in its inclusion in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04773
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04773 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) to his dependents. The applicant could have transferred benefits at any time between 26 October 2009 and his last day of active service 31 March 2010. ...