AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01516
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01516 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to benefits under the Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) program for his medical conditions associated with application to the Board, AFBCMR Docket No. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01524
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPA recommends that partial relief be granted indicating that it would be in the interest of justice to correct the applicants records to reflect her 1 Oct 11 MSD was waived and that she was retained in the Reserve until 1 Apr 12,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01526
AFBCMR BC-2013-01526 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, be corrected to show that: a. If AFPC discovers any adverse factors during or subsequent to supplemental consideration that are separate and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01544
AFBCMR BC-2013-01544 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX,be corrected to show that he was extended Federal recognition and promoted Reserve of the Air Force to the grade of major (0-4), per Title 10,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01550
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01550 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 19 Dec 12 and a duplicate FA entry dated 1 Sep 10 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). He received an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member's Qualification Status, dated 9...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01557
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01557 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His non-recommendation for award of the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) be changed to recommend. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He never received any negative paperwork or an...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01570
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by DFAS and the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C, D, and E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS recommends relief be granted, indicating that there are competing statutes and implementing directives which prevented the applicant from fulfilling her five-year ADSC. By law, the applicant had to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01571
The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In 1968, he went TDY to Kadena AFB, Japan for six months. While the applicant requests his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect service in Thailand; in accordance with Department of Defense directives, the DD Form 214 will not be reissued or amended to reflect specific locations served in an AOR. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01578
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01578 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be amended to reflect time served in Vietnam. DPAPP states that after a review of the applicants master personnel records and documentation submitted...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01580
Based on the information provided, they recommend the applicants case be sent to a medical consultant for determination as to whether a medical discharge is warranted. Although the applicant reportedly has been awarded a total (100%) disability rating for one or more service connected medical conditions by the DVA, no evidence is presented to show either of these interfered with his military service to the extent or duration that warranted an alternative medical release from military...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01585
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01585 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 27 Oct 2011, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 28 Oct 2011, an LOD was initiated stating...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01586
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01586 XXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 13 Dec 11 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 19 Sep...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01591
On 29 Nov 2011, a medical evaluation letter was signed by the same provider who issued the previous AF Form 469s. The letter states, There are medical conditions that preclude this member from achieving a passing score on the Air Force fitness assessment. On 1 Dec 2011, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was initiated from his Medical Provider, which could exempt the applicant from the cardio and push-up components of the FA. On 27 Mar 2012, a medical evaluation letter was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01594
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-01594 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he transferred his Post 9-11 GI Bill benefits to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01599
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01599 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His dishonorable discharge be upgraded. The applicant was dishonorably discharged effective 14 December 2009 after serving eight years, seven months, and seven days on active duty. The complete JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01601
Additionally, voluntary (10 USC 12301(d)) deployed service to Afghanistan or Iraq prior to January 2007 is also creditable for the purpose of calculating PDMRA. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01604
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request for entitlement to the GWOT-E medal. We note the OPR will administratively correct the applicants records to reflect her entitlement to the Afghanistan Campaign Medal w/1BSS and the AFESR w/GB and 1BOLC. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01607
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01607 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The handwritten note stating that he was injured in 1958 be removed from his medical records. The DVA opined the applicants condition existed prior to service. We took notice of the available evidence of record and the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01608
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01608 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be changed to a medical retirement with the associated back pay. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of medical documents, orders, a letter written by the XXXX Space Operations Squadron commander dated 26 March 2013, stating the applicant should have been allowed to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01611
Members of the Board considered this application on 10 October 2013. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPSIT, dtd 5 April 2013 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-01611 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01621
The time reflected in block 11 (Primary Specialty) of her DD Form 214 of 5 years and 10 months should be the same as the time (6 years) in block 12 (Record of Service). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C, D and E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01624
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01624 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. In response, the applicant provided a character reference, a personal narrative of his time in the Air Force, and the prescription for his glasses (Exhibit C). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01625
According to the applicable regulation in regards to the date of the test, AFI 36-2905, members with a composite score <75 are considered Unsatisfactory. The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 7 Jun 2013 94.90 Excellent *11 Mar 13 74.30 Unsatisfactory 10 Dec 12 74.00 Unsatisfactory 28 Jun 12 85.90 Satisfactory 15 Dec 11 87.50 Satisfactory *Annotates Contested FA On 13 Mar 13, an AF FM 108 was signed by the applicants medical provider. On 16 Jan...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01627
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibits C and E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFD recommends denial indicating there was no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred during the disability process. The USAF disability boards must rate disabilities based on the members condition at the time...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01632
Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-01632 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to (DECEASED), , be corrected to show that on 13 January 2013, he applied for, and competent authority received, his application for...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01643
IAW AFI 36-2905, Para 2.10.4 Members with a duty limiting condition (DLC) prohibiting them from performing one or more components of the FA will have a composite score calculated on the assessed components. On 14 Aug 12, the applicant participated in the contested FA and was tested on the sit-up, push-up and AC components of the test. IAW AFI 36-2905; Attach 1, para 10, If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results; and para...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01644
IAW AFI 36-2905, AFGM 1, dated 1 July 2010, Para 1.21.8., exempted members returning from deployment are assessed after the period of acclimatization (42 days from return to home station for RegAF) unless member requests to assess earlier. On 7 Jan 2014, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), due to Insufficient evidence; specifically no commander invalidation. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01648
Upon discharge, he immediately filed for an upgrade to his discharge, with the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB), which was granted. His upgrade was a result of errors and injustices because his commander and his staff forced him out without following the Air Force Instructions (AFIs). On 21 Jan 10, the applicant applied for Reserve retirement; however, Air Force Reserve Recruiting Service (AFRCRS) and the Air Force Reserve Commander AFRC/CC recommended the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01651
On 15 May 12, the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) considered the applicants case as a dual-action case and determined the applicant should be discharged by execution of the approved discharge action for misconduct. DPFD states the preponderance of evidence reflects that no error or injustice occurred during the disability process or at the time of separation. The complete DPFD evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01652
This medical condition existed during the contested FA, but not diagnosed until after the test was complete. from the Unit CC. The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 20 May 13 88.25 Satisfactory(Exempt from Cardio) *25 Jan 13 68.90 Unsatisfactory 16 May 12 74.00 Unsatisfactory 28 Oct 11 85.90 Satisfactory 28 Apr 11 82.80 Satisfactory *Contested FA _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01659
The Boards may rate any condition they find that renders the service member unfit for service. Further, it must be noted the Air Force disability boards must rate disabilities based on the members condition at the time of evaluation; in essence, a snapshot of their condition at that time. On 25 April 2007, the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) found the applicant unfit for further military service due to chronic low back pain, with disc extrusion of L4-5 and L5-S1, and recommended...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01664
IAW AFI 36-2905, AFGM 1, dated 1 July 2010, Para 1.21.8., exempted members returning from deployment are assessed after the period of acclimatization (42 days from return to home station for RegAF) unless member requests to assess earlier. On 7 Jan 2014, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), due to Insufficient evidence; specifically no commander invalidation. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01665
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Per AFI 36-2638, Air Force Reserve Enlisted Incentives, service members who wish to reenlist with an incentive must be within six months of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01667
His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect all awards and decorations, to include the Air Force Overseas RibbonShort Tour (AFOR-ST), which was inadvertently excluded. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial in regards to the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01670
AFBCMR BC-2013-01670 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01679
AFBCMR BC-2013-01679 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01688
The applicants last six FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 3 Mar 14 85.00 Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) 9 Sep 13 96.38 Excellent (Exempt from PU/SU) 7 Mar 13 87.63 Satisfactory (Exempt from PU/SU) 11 Sep 12 82.00 Satisfactory (Exempt from PU/SU) 30 Apr 12 82.00 Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) *31 Jan 12 72.63 Unsatisfactory (Exempt from PU/SU) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_AFGM3 (3 Jan 12),...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01702
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01702 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of entry (DOE) in the Air Force Reserve (AFR) be corrected to reflect 2 October 2011 instead of 11 May 2012 to eliminate a break in service. DPTS states that due to a delay in processing the 19 March 2012, scroll at the SecDef level...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01703
He would have transferred his MGIB benefits to the Post-9/11 Bill if he would have known that MGIB transferability to dependents went away and/or that his ADSC would have been waived if he transferred to the Post-9/11 GI Bill. He was not provided the proper information pertaining to the GI Bill benefits or transferring his education benefits to the Post-9/11 GI Bill. While the applicant contends he was unaware that he could not transfer the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) (Chapter 30) to his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01708
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. While we note the steps the Air Force OPR indicates were taken to inform eligible personnel of this new benefit, it appears that...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01710
Members of the Board, considered this application on 27 February 2014. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPSIT, dtd 12 April 2013 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-01710 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01713
Members of the Board, considered this application on 27 February 2014. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPSIT, dtd 12 April 2013 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-01713 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01717
After reviewing the documentation presented and the applicants military personnel record, there is no evidence to warrant changing the applicants HOR. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 13 Dec 13 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). Applicant's Master Personnel...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01718
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends the Air Force Decorations Board advise on whether the applicants recommendation package would have been approved at the time of the act or achievement. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. SAF/MRBP recommends approval. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBP, dated 7 Oct 2013.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01719
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2013-01719 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Article 15 nonjudicial punishment received in November 2012 be set-aside. He and his legal counsel followed the correct actions for each level of appeal; however, his commander refused to act upon the evidence presented. The Board notes the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicates the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01724
On 4 Jun 87, the applicants commander notified him he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for misconduct. The applicant appealed to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (DRB) to have his general discharge upgraded. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01734
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01734 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Air Medal (AM). The applicant provided a document from Headquarters 7th Air Force which appears to be instructions for distribution of AM award elements. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01735
The applicant is requesting his character of service, narrative reason for separation, RE and Separation codes be upgraded based on the repeal of Dont Ask Dont Tell. Rather, an entry-level separation with uncharacterized service is used in those cases where the service member has not yet completed six months of service at the time of separation proceedings were initiated. Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2013-01735 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01738
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01738 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he is eligible to participate in the Air National Guard (ANG) Aviator Continuation Pay (ACP) program for fiscal year 2012 (FY12) with a three-year tour service commitment. An error and delay in processing his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01740
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01740 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended to reflect time served in Kuwait. They requested the DD Form 214 be corrected and a copy sent to the applicant. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission...