Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1501159

Original file (ND1501159.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-CTT3, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20150609

Characterization of Service Received: (per DD 214) UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL)

Narrative Reason for Discharge: (corrected) PHYSICAL STANDARDS
Reenlistment Code: RE-3F
Authority for Discharge: (per DD 214) MILPERSMAN 1910-170 [PHYSICAL STANDARDS]

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:      HONORABLE
         Narrative Reason change to:      NONE REQUESTED

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:        USNR (DEP)       20081216 - 20090616 COG         Active: NONE

Period of Service Under Review:

Date of Current Enlistment: 20090617    Age at Enlistment: 19
Period of Enlistment: 4 Years 24 MONTHS Extension
Date of Discharge: 20131120     Highest Rank/Rate: CTT3
Length of Service: 04 Year(s) 05 Month(s) 04 Day(s)
Education Level: 12     AFQT: 75
Evaluation Marks:        Performance: 3.40 (5)    Behavior: 2.80 (5)      OTA: 3.17

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):     Pistol MM GCM NDSM GWOTSM SSDR ESWS

Periods of UA/CONF: NONE

NJP: NONE        SCM: NONE        SPCM: NONE       CC: NONE         Retention Warning Counseling: NONE

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         Block 26, Separation Code, should read: “JFT”
         Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, should read: “PHYSICAL STANDARDS”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation:          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:          From/To Representation:          From/To Congress member:

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 36, effective 12 July 2011 until Present, MILPERSMAN Article 1910-170, SEPARATION BY REASON OF PHYSICAL FITNESS ASSESSMENT FAILURE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(a), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant contends that the discharge characterization of Under Honorable Conditions (General) was in error and the correct characterization should be Honorable.

Decision

Date: 20150827 DOCUMENTARY REVIEW Location: Washington D.C. Representation: American Legion

By a vote of 5-0 the Characterization shall change to HONORABLE .
By a vote of 5-0 the Narrative Reason shall change to PHYSICAL STANDARDS .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to her discharge and the discharge process to ensure her discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included no NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings and no misconduct resulting in nonjudicial punishment or court-martial. Based on a failure to maintain physical readiness standards, her command administratively processed her for separation. The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived her rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board or a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review.

Issue 1: (Decisional) (Propriety) RELIEF WARRANTED. The Applicant contends that the discharge characterization of Under Honorable Conditions (General) was in error and the correct characterization should be Honorable. The Applicant provided a letter from the Commanding Officer of USS GONZALEZ (DDG 66) admitting the error, and the letter was verified by the NDRB. The Applicant’s service record contains no adverse material other than multiple failures of the Navy’s physical readiness assessments. Her evaluations document above average performance marks except in the area of physical fitness. She had earned her Good Conduct Medal. The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214 in that Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, should be corrected to read PHYSICAL STANDARDS vice WEIGHT CONTROL FAILURE. The NDRB discerned no impropriety in the discharge action but did discern an inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. By unanimous vote, the NDRB voted to upgrade the characterization of the discharge to Honorable. The narrative reason for the discharge shall be corrected to PHYSICAL STANDARDS. Relief granted.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, service record entries, and discharge process, the Board found the discharge was proper but not equitable at the time of discharge. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall change to HONORABLE and the narrative reason for separation shall be corrected to PHYSICAL STANDARDS. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of her discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 , or http://www.secnav.navy.mil/mra/bcnr/Pages/default.aspx for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Effective 6 February 2015, the NDRB is authorized to change a NDRB Applicant’s Reenlistment Code if related to an accompanying change in discharge characterization or narrative, but this authority is strictly limited to those cases where an applicant’s narrative reason or characterization of discharge is changed and that change warrants revision of the previously issued reenlistment code. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE-CODE” is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000860

Original file (ND1000860.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Narrative Reason for Discharge:Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301239

Original file (ND1301239.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201091

Original file (ND1201091.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

: (Decisional) () .The Applicant contends her record of service, as evidenced by her evaluations and her mental health at the time of separation, warrants consideration for upgrading her discharge.Despite the positive aspects of a service member’s record of service, some circumstances surrounding a discharge might still warrant separation with a characterization of service less favorable than Honorable. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300105

Original file (ND1300105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20070827 - 20080721Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20080722Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20111011Highest Rank/Rate: CTT3Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 20 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 48EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(2)Behavior:2.5(2)OTA: 3.10Awards and Decorations (per DD...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700388

Original file (ND0700388.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101701

Original file (ND1101701.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

By a unanimous vote, the Administrative Separation Board recommended that the Applicant be separated from the Navy due to Commission of a Serious Offense and that he receive a General (Under Honorable Conditions) character of service. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101956

Original file (ND1101956.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300333

Original file (ND1300333.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation.
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1501158

Original file (ND1501158.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on a failure to maintain physical readiness standards, her command administratively processed her for separation. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall change to HONORABLE and the narrative reason for separation shall be corrected to PHYSICAL STANDARDS. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400040

Original file (ND1400040.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1501159

Similar Decisions