Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1501158
Original file (ND1501158.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-STG2, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20150529
Characterization of Service Received: (per DD 214) GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)
Narrative Reason for Discharge: (corrected) PHYSICAL STANDARDS
Reenlistment Code: RE-4
Authority for Discharge: (per DD 214) MILPERSMAN 1910-170 [PHYSICAL STANDARDS]

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:      HONORABLE
         Narrative Reason change to:      NONE REQUESTED

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:        USNR (DEP)       19980929 - 19981026 COG         Active:  USN 19981027 - 20011209 HON

Period of Service Under Review:

Date of Current Enlistment: 20011210    Age at Enlistment: 24
Period of Enlistment: 6 Years NO Extension
Date of Discharge: 20060707     Highest Rank/Rate: STG2
Length of Service: 04 Year(s) 06 Month(s) 28 Day(s)
Education Level: 12     AFQT: 90
Evaluation Marks:        Performance: 4.00 (6)    Behavior: 1.83 (6)      OTA: 3.48

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):     GCM GWOTSM NMCAM

Periods of UA/CONF: NONE

NJP: NONE        SCM: NONE        SPCM: NONE       CC: NONE

Retention Warning Counseling: 4

- 20031103:      For failure of the Physical Fitness Assessment, exceeding height/weight and body fat limits.

- 20041108:      For failure of the Physical Fitness Assessment, exceeding height/weight and body fat limits.

- 20050421:      For failure of the Physical Fitness Assessment, exceeding height/weight and body fat limits.

- 20051109:      For failure of the Physical Fitness Assessment, exceeding height/weight and body fat limits.

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         Block 13, Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, should read: “GOOD CONDUCT MEDAL, GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM SERVICE MEDAL, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS ACHIEVEMENT MEDAL”
         Block 18, Remarks, should contain the statement: “CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 981027 UNTIL 011209”
         Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, should read: “PHYSICAL STANDARDS”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.


Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:           Service/Medical Record:           Other Records:  

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation:           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:           From/To Representation:           From/To Congress member:        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 12, effective 3 August 2005 until
16 January 2007, MILPERSMAN Article 1910-170, SEPARATION BY REASON OF PHYSICAL FITNESS ASSESSMENT FAILURE.

B. NAVADMIN 180/05, 271525Z JUL 05, PHYSICAL READINESS PROGRAM.



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant contends that an Honorable characterization of service is warranted since she did not have any misconduct or performance issues.

Decision

Date: 20150827   DOCUMENTARY REVIEW       Location: Washington D.C.        Representation: NONE

By a vote of 5-0 the Characterization shall change to HONORABLE .
By a vote of 5-0 the Narrative Reason shall change to PHYSICAL STANDARDS .
Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to her discharge and the discharge process to ensure her discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included four NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings and no misconduct resulting in nonjudicial punishment or court-martial. Based on a failure to maintain physical readiness standards, her command administratively processed her for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the notification procedure, the Applicant waived her rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board.

Issue 1: (Decisional) (Equity) RELIEF WARRANTED. The Applicant contends that an Honorable characterization of service is warranted since she did not have any misconduct or performance issues. The Applicant’s service record contains no adverse material other than multiple failures of the Navy’s physical readiness standards. Her evaluations document above average performance marks except in the area of physical fitness, and she was awarded a Navy Achievement Medal just prior to her discharge. She had also earned her Good Conduct Medal. Her last evaluation contained comments that she was a stellar and exceptional performer whose performance was marred only by multiple physical fitness assessment failures. The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214 in that Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, should be corrected to read PHYSICAL STANDARDS vice WEIGHT CONTROL FAILURE. The NDRB discerned no impropriety in the discharge action but did discern an inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. By unanimous vote, the NDRB voted to upgrade the characterization of the discharge to Honorable. The narrative reason for the discharge shall be corrected to PHYSICAL STANDARDS. Relief granted.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, service record entries, and discharge process, the Board found the discharge was proper but not equitable at the time of discharge. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall change to HONORABLE and the narrative reason for separation shall be corrected to PHYSICAL STANDARDS. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of her discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 , or http://www.secnav.navy.mil/mra/bcnr/Pages/default.aspx for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Effective 6 February 2015, the NDRB is authorized to change a NDRB Applicant’s Reenlistment Code if related to an accompanying change in discharge characterization or narrative, but this authority is strictly limited to those cases where an applicant’s narrative reason or characterization of discharge is changed and that change warrants revision of the previously issued reenlistment code. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE-CODE” is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101594

    Original file (ND1101594.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901646

    Original file (MD0901646.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000461

    Original file (ND1000461.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.Issue 3: (Decisional) (Board Issue) (Equity) RELIEF WARRANTED After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the NDRB discerned no impropriety in the discharge action but did discern an inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500575

    Original file (ND0500575.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION As you can see with the Documents Provided my record was reviewed and I received an Honorable My DD 214 Still States a General Discharge. Relief is not warranted.The Applicant contends that he was issued an honorable discharge certificate and therefore is entitled to an upgrade of his characterization of service to honorable.

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300346

    Original file (MD1300346.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801955

    Original file (ND0801955.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant should understand that the basis of his separation, “commission of a serious offense (sexual perversion)”, does not require adjudication by judicial or non-judicial proceedings. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600859

    Original file (MD0600859.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, discharge warning issued.20010111: Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (You have been assigned to the Marine Corps weight control program for a period of six months. Post-service conduct.Regarding Issue 1, the Board determined that this is not an issue which can form the basis of relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900288

    Original file (MD0900288.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall WEIGHT CONTROL FAILURE.Discussion :().The Applicant contends after 12 plus years of decorated and faithful service, he believes his discharge, due to weight control, does not rate a “General (Under Honorable Conditions)” and his misconduct was due to mitigating circumstances (family issues). The Board determined the characterization of service received, “General (Under Honorable Conditions)”, was an appropriate characterization considering the length...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001147

    Original file (MD1001147.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Separation Authorityreviewed the Command’s recommendation for separation; he determined that the Applicant’s documented record of service established the minimum requirements for discharge based on a demonstrated unsatisfactory performance of duties; that separation in the Applicant’s case was warranted; and further, that the proposed characterization of service -General (UnderHonorable Conditions) - was warranted. On 06 October 2003, the Separation Authority directed the Applicant be...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900290

    Original file (MD0900290.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, by unanimous vote, the narrative reason for the discharge, “Condition not a disability” shall remain as issued. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons.