Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500393

Original file (ND1500393.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-EO3, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20141202

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge: NON-RETENTION ON ACTIVE DUTY
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:      INVOLUNTARY SEPARATION


Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:        USNR (DEP)       20060419 - 20061009     Active: 20061010 - NFIR

Period of Service Under Review:

Date of Current Enlistment: NFIR        Age at Enlistment: Unable to determine
Period of Enlistment: Unable to determine
Date of Discharge: 20141009     Highest Rank/Rate: EO2
Length of Service: Unable to determine final enlistment period of service
Education Level:        AFQT: 83
Evaluation Marks:        Available but unable to determine when final enlistment started
[Second enlistment documentation is not in record]

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):     Rifle Pistol AVUA (2) (2) (2) ESC

Periods of UA/CONF:

NJP:

- 20130718:      Article 86 (Absence without leave)
        Awarded: Suspended: [Vacated 20130802]

SCM:     SPCM:    CC:      Retention Warning Counseling:

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation:          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:          From/To Representation:          From/To Congress member:

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, 20 June 2005 until Present, Article 1910-104, SEPARATION BY REASON OF EXPIRATION OF ACTIVE OBLIGATED SERVICE (EAOS).

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(b), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant contends that she was recommended for retention, was promotable, and was eligible for enlistment.
2.       The Applicant seeks a different narrative reason due to her separation being involuntary upon reaching high year tenure.

Decision

Date: 20150319            Location: Washington D.C.        Representation:

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall NON-RETENTION ON ACTIVE DUTY .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included for of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 (Absence without leave). The Applicant was discharged upon reaching high year tenure after eight years of service.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant contends that she was recommended for retention, was promotable, and was eligible for enlistment. The NDRB has no authority to authorize severance pay. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge. The Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records, 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490. Their website is http://www.donhq.navy.mil/bcnr/bcnr.htm.

: (Decisional) () . The Applicant seeks a different narrative reason due to her separation being involuntary upon reaching high year tenure. The Applicant also contends that she was recommended for retention, was promotable, and was eligible for enlistment. The Applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the Applicant received a separation code of JGH, a reenlistment code of RE-6, a narrative reason of Non-Retention on Active Duty, and was discharged at exactly on her eight year mark. All of these are consistent with an involuntary discharge due to reaching high year tenure. However, the NDRB determined that her narrative reason of Non-Retention on Active Duty is accurate and it is still consistent with an involuntary discharge. Although the Applicant also contends that she was recommended for retention, was promotable, and was eligible for enlistment; the NDRB determined that these issues were immaterial to the validity of her Non-Retention on Active Duty narrative reason. The NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity and the Applicant’s separation for her high year tenure and subsequent narrative reason were appropriate. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain HONORABLE and the narrative reason for separation shall remain NON-RETENTION ON ACTIVE DUTY. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Effective 6 February 2015, the NDRB is authorized to change a NDRB Applicant’s Reenlistment Code if related to an accompanying change in discharge characterization or narrative, but this authority is strictly limited to those cases where an applicant’s narrative reason or characterization of discharge is changed and that change warrants revision of the previously issued reenlistment code. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE-CODE” is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400440

Original file (ND1400440.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:SUFFICIENT SERVICE FOR RETIREMENT Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19871027 - 19880906Active: 19880907 - NFIR 19960906 - NFIR Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20020710Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: Years21ExtensionDate of Discharge:20070118Highest Rank/Rate:MT1Length of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 9 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT:...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902495

Original file (ND0902495.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain NON-RETENTION ON ACTIVE DUTY.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of his discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902108

Original file (MD0902108.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)19940823 - 19950205Active:19950206 - 19981109 Active: 19981110 - 20020604Active: 20020605 - 20050104 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20050105Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20090104Highest Rank: Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)00 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:NFIRMOS: 0121Proficiency/Conduct Marks...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101392

Original file (ND1101392.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301618

Original file (ND1301618.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Representation: By a vote of...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301323

Original file (ND1301323.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant seeks a change to his narrative reason and separation code to correspond with a Completion of Required Service. Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall NON-RETENTION ON ACTIVE DUTY.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges,...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001259

Original file (ND1001259.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301452

Original file (MD1301452.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain COMPLETION OF REQUIRED ACTIVE SERVICE.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300755

Original file (MD1300755.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. The Applicant requests a narrative reason change to Completion of Active Duty Service with a corresponding change to the separation code. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901817

Original file (ND0901817.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the Applicant's official service record, the NDRB determined the narrative reason for separation was correct as issued.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain NON-RETENTION ON ACTIVE DUTY.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500393

Similar Decisions