Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300755

Original file (MD1300755.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20130116

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge: NON-RETENTION ON ACTIVE DUTY

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN PAR 1005

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive:         NONE              Active: 20000918 - 200310 23 HON
                                    20031024 - 20071029 HON

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20071030     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20120929      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 0 0 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 33
MOS: 5811/0149
Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle Pistol CoA (3) CoC (2) GWOTSM ICM (2) LoA (9) (4) (2) MOVSM

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP:             SCM:             SPCM:          CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :
- 20080509 :       For failure to maintain a minimum GPA of 80% which led to you being disenrolled from a formal PME school (Sergeant’s Course) on 20080404. This is your second time being disenrolled from the s ame course. You were also disenrolled from Sergeant’s Course on 20070307 for academic failure.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed
Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present, Paragraph 1005, DISCHARGE FOR EXPIRATION OF ENLISTMENT OR FULFILLMENT OF SERVICE OBLIGATION .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant requests a narrative reason change to Completion of Active Duty Service with a corresponding change to the separation code.

Decision

Date: 20131030 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall NON-RETENTION ON ACTIVE DUTY .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warning . The Applicant successfully completed his third enlistment and was discharged at the expiration of his active obligated service.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant requests a narrative reason change to Completion of Active Duty Service with a corresponding change to the separation code. The record shows the Applicant was discharged at the expiration of his active obligated service and was involuntarily discharged for reaching high year tenure after more than 12 y ears of service . T he NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity and determined that the Applicant’s narrative reason of N on-Retention on Active Duty and his corresponding separation code we re proper . Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain NON-RETENTION ON ACTIVE DUTY . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1501029

Original file (MD1501029.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300581

Original file (MD1300581.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a complete review of the records, the NDRB determined no impropriety in the Marine Corps’ decision and further determined that no change to the narrative reason was warranted as Non-Retention on Active Duty accurately describes the Applicant’s end of service and is in accordance with the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500875

Original file (MD1500875.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Types of Witnesses Who Testified Expert: Character:...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000562

Original file (MD1000562.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. If the Applicant believes otherwise, he may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500938

Original file (MD1500938.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Narrative Reason for Discharge: NON-RETENTION ON ACTIVE DUTY Reenlistment Code: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400016

Original file (MD1400016.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant was not recommended for retention and was involuntarily discharged at the end of his obligated service with an Honorable characterization of service. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the Narrative Reason for Separation shall remain NON-RETENTION ON ACTIVE DUTY.The Applicant...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902108

Original file (MD0902108.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)19940823 - 19950205Active:19950206 - 19981109 Active: 19981110 - 20020604Active: 20020605 - 20050104 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20050105Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20090104Highest Rank: Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)00 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:NFIRMOS: 0121Proficiency/Conduct Marks...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000005

Original file (MD1000005.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Nondecisional issues: Applicant seeks an upgrade in his characterization of service to Honorable and a change in re-enlistment code in order to reenlist in the Marine Corps.2. The Applicant provided no additional documentation to the NDRB that was not already included in his service record. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101547

Original file (MD1101547.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

For reasons undetermined, the Applicant was not processed for administrative separation from the Marine Corps for Misconduct-Drug Abuse, which would normally result in an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge. Therefore, in accordance with the MARCORSEPMAN, the awarded characterization of service shall HONORABLE and the narrative reason for separation shall remain COMPLETION OF REQUIRED ACTIVE SERVICE. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800788

Original file (MD0800788.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19990111 - 19990124Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19990125Period of enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20030513Length of Service: Yrs Mths06 DysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 66MOS: 0311Highest Rank: Fitness reports: Proficiency/Conduct marks:/Awards and Decorations (per DD 214): Rifle Pistol Periods of UA/CONF:...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300755

Similar Decisions