Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500190

Original file (ND1500190.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AR, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20141024

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:        USNR (DEP)       20140613 - 20140715     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:

Date of Current Enlistment: 20140716    Age at Enlistment:
Period of Enlistment: Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20140814     Highest Rank/Rate: AR
Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 29 Day(s)
Education Level:        AFQT: 69
Evaluation Marks:        NONE

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):     NONE

Periods of UA/CONF:

NJP:     SCM:     SPCM:    CC:     Retention Warning Counseling:

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation:          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:          From/To Representation:          From/To Congress member:

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 29, effective 10 November 2009 until Present, Article 1910-134, Separation by Reason of Defective Enlistments and Inductions - Fraudulent Entry Into the Naval Service.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(b), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant contends he did not have any knee problems prior to enlisting.
2.       The Applicant contends the paperwork was rushed and he never had the chance to speak to counsel prior to signing documents.

Decision

Date: 20150212            Location: Washington D.C.        Representation:

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included no NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings and no misconduct resulting in nonjudicial punishment or court-martial. Based on the Applicant’s fraudulent entry, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review.

: (Decisional) () . The Applicant contends he did not have any knee problems prior to enlisting. The NDRB presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs in the absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary. On 22 July 2014, the Applicant’s second day of processing (P-2), he was diagnosed with chronic right knee pain, chest tightness with exertion, and reoccurring light headedness. Competent medical authority ascertained that none of those issues were reported by the Applicant at Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS). The medical document dated 22 July 2014 describes that the Applicant reported that he had bilateral knee pain for years. The NDRB found that the documentation and statements provided for review do not refute the presumption that the Applicant deliberately misrepresented his medical condition(s) during the enlistment process, including the omission or concealment of facts which, if known at the time would have reasonably been expected to preclude, postpone, or otherwise affect the servicemember’s eligibility for enlistment or induction. No other narrative reason other than fraudulent entry more clearly describes the circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s processing for administrative separation. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) () . The Applicant contends the paperwork was rushed and he never had the chance to speak to counsel prior to signing documents. The Applicant not only failed to provide any proof to support this contention, but all the evidence in the record is to the contrary. On 22 July 2014, the Applicant acknowledged that the Health Care Center recommended that he be separated. Over two weeks later on 06 August 2014, the Applicant signed his notification for administrative separation based on his fraudulent entry. During the notification, the Applicant was advised of his rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review. However, the Applicant initialed and waived these rights, thus accepting the discharge recommended in the letter of notification. Therefore, the NDRB determined that the Applicant’s contention to be without merit. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNCHARACTERIZED (ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain FRAUDULENT ENTRY. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400744

Original file (MD1400744.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400499

Original file (MD1400499.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20030923 - 20031013Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20031014Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20031126Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)13 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:62MOS: 9900Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):NA/NAFitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100365

Original file (MD1100365.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to:CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20020806 - 20021104Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20021105Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20021127Highest Rank: Length of Service: Years Months23 DaysEducation Level: AFQT:63MOS: 9900Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):NONE / NONEFitness Reports: Awards...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902467

Original file (MD0902467.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Decisional issues: Applicant seeks change in narrative reason for discharge and characterization of separation due to both propriety (wrong narrative reason for his circumstances) and (equity) in that he rates an Honorable characterization due to serving without misconduct. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801216

Original file (ND0801216.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Additionally, the Board determined the characterization of service was also appropriate based on the evidence of record. The NDRB advises the Applicant that, with respect to nonservice related administrative matters, i.e. Department of Veterans Affairs benefits, civilian employment, etc., an uncharacterized separation shall be considered the equivalent of an honorable or general (under honorable conditions) characterization.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700850

Original file (MD0700850.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20040729 - 20041227 Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20041228 Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge: 20051003Length of Service: 00 Yrs 09 Mths03 Dys Lost Time: Days UA: Days...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901886

Original file (ND0901886.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:REFLECT CORRECT REASON FOR DISCHARGE Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:NONEActive: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20080623Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20081029Highest Rank/Rate:SRLength of Service: Inactive: Year(s)02Month(s)17 Day(s)Active: Year(s)Month(s) 20 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 32EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIROTA:...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900837

Original file (ND0900837.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” The Board determined the Applicant did not fully disclose pre-service knee problems and the narrative reason for separation was appropriate.For the edification of the Applicant, an Uncharacterized (Entry Level Separation) discharge is initiated within the first 180 days of continuous active duty. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201516

Original file (ND1201516.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant wants to change his RE-code.2. Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100673

Original file (ND1100673.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20090515 - 20100315Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20100316Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20100423Highest Rank/Rate:ARLength of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 08 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 43EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods of...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500190

Similar Decisions