Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500044
Original file (ND1500044.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-OS2, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20141001
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:        USNR (DEP)       20070609 - 20070821     Active:  20070822 – 20110809 HON

Pre-Service Drug Waiver:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20110810    Age at Enlistment:
Period of Enlistment: Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20140930     Highest Rank/Rate: OS2
Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 20 Day(s)
Education Level:        AFQT: 49
Evaluation Marks:        Performance: 3.0 (4)     Behavior: 2.7 (4)       OTA: 2.96

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):    

Periods of UA/CONF:

NJP:

- 20140717:      Article (Wrongful use, possession, etc. of controlled substances, Oxymorphone)
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM: SPCM: CC: Retention Warning Counseling:


Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 070822 UNTIL 110809”
        
The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, PERS-312A, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:           Service/Medical Record:           Other Records:  

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation:           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:           From/To Representation:           From/To Congress member:        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 29, effective 10 November 2009 until Present, Article 1910-146, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant contends her discharge is inequitable because she was discharged for drug abuse of her doctor prescribed pain medication.

Decision

Date: 20150225            Location: Washington D.C.        Representation:

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included for of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article (Wrongful use, possession, etc. of controlled substances; Oxymorphone). The Applicant a pre-service drug waiver prior to entering the Navy. Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administrative separation is mandatory. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board. An Administrative Separation Board convened on 4 September 2014 and determined by unanimous vote that the preponderance of evidence proved misconduct-drug abuse, and by unanimous vote recommended the Applicant be administratively discharged with Under Honorable Conditions (General) discharge for reason of drug abuse.

: (Decisional) () . The Applicant contends her discharge is inequitable because she was discharged for drug abuse of her doctor prescribed pain medication. The Applicant’s records show that she was prescribed 60 Oxycodone pills by Navy medical authorities on 30 October 2013 for post-operation pain relief. The Applicant contends that she was told to take 1-2 pills every 4 hours as needed for pain. Prior to her prescription for Oxycodone, she was prescribed Hydrocodone for severe menstrual pain. The Applicant states that she continued to take the Oxycodone for pain, and tested positive for Oxymorphone on a urinalysis test on 23 June 2014. The Applicant was found guilty at NJP for wrongful use of a controlled substance (Oxymorphone) on 17 July 2014. On 21 July 2014, the Applicant was again prescribed 20 Oxycodone pills by Navy medical authorities for pain relief. The Applicant had no history of illegal drug use prior to service in the Navy. The Applicant had an Administrative Separation Board hearing where she was able to present her medical evidence of prescription drugs that caused her to test positive for Oxymorphone; however, the Board voted unanimously that a preponderance of evidence proved her wrongful drug abuse, and voted to discharge her. After carefully reviewing the Applicant’s record, and her statement to the NDRB, the NDRB determined that, although the Applicant did use Oxycodone, her Oxycodone use was expressly prescribed to her by medical authorities, and there was no evidence of wrongful use. Therefore, the NDRB determined the Applicant’s discharge is inequitable. As the Applicant’s record contains no other negative aspects of performance or conduct, the NDRB determined her characterization of service should be changed to Honorable, and her narrative reason for discharge should be changed to Secretarial Authority. Relief granted.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall change to HONORABLE and the narrative reason for separation shall change to SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400350

    Original file (MD1400350.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00576

    Original file (FD-2008-00576.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    * Change Reason and Authority + Change Reenlistment Code a ais : oo SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL a AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 32RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFR, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00576 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201172

    Original file (MD1201172.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record shows the Commanding Officer, 3d Battalion, 6 th Marine Regiment notified the Applicant via a letter dated 31 January 2011 that he was being processed for administrative separation for Misconduct (Drug Abuse). Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021916

    Original file (20110021916.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She also acknowledged she understood that as a result of the issuance of a discharge under honorable conditions, she could make an application to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) or the Army Board for Correction of Military Records for an upgrade. Subsequent to her acknowledgement, her immediate commander forwarded the separation action for misconduct in accordance with paragraph 14-12(c) of Army Regulation 635-200 with a recommendation for the issuance of a discharge under honorable...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201063

    Original file (MD1201063.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201026

    Original file (ND1201026.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administrative separation is mandatory. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1401383

    Original file (MD1401383.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002107

    Original file (MD1002107.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues Decisional issues:The Applicant and her counsel contend the following issues resulted in an improper discharge and an inequitable discharge characterization of service: (1) the Applicant should have been medically discharged with disability; (2) the Applicant’s new chain of command refused medical care and broke all contact with the medical staff; (3) the chain of command...

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1401468

    Original file (MD1401468.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remainUNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS and the narrative reason for separation shall remainMISCONDUCTThe Applicant remains eligible for a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700963

    Original file (MD0700963.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) found in the Applicant’s record of his Administrative Discharge Board that the Applicant claimed that he was given the pill by his father. Recommendation on Separation: BY Recommendation on Characterization: BY Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20060427) SJA review (date): Separation Authority (date): CG, 2 nd MARDIV (20060515) Basis for discharge directed: DUE TO: Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20060525 Types of...