Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400732

Original file (ND1400732.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-MMFR, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20140307

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20060629 - 20070320     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20070321     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20101022      Highest Rank/Rate: MMFN
Length of Service: Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 27 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 61
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.8 ( 5 )      Behavior: 2.0 ( 5 )        OTA: 3.16

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      (2)

Period of C ONF :

Lost time per DD214: 20091210-20100107, 18 days ; 20100108-20100415, 81 days

NJP :

- 20091009:      Article (Absence without leave)
         Article 87 (Missing movement) [Extracted from Evaluation Report & Counseling Record dated 20100705]
         Awarded: Suspended: (1 month) [Extracted from CO’s letter dated 20100909]

- 20100426:      Article (Desertion)
         Article (Absence without leave)
         Awarded: Suspended: ) [Extracted from CO’s letter dated 20100909]

- 201008 28 :      Article ( Provoking speeches and gestures )
         Article (Assault)
         Awarded: Suspended: ) [Extracted from CO’s letter dated 20100909]

- 20100907 :      Article (Assault)
         Awarded: Suspended: [Extracted from CO’s letter dated 20100909]

S CM :    SPCM:    C C :      Retention Warning Counseling:

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation:          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:          From/To Representation:          From/To Congress member:

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 29, effective 10 November 2009 until 17 August 2011, Article 1910-142, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article s 85 , 86, 87, 117, and 128.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant contends he was mentally and physically abused by members of his command , a nd his discha rge was unjust.

Decision

Date: 20 1 4 0826 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included for o f the Uniform Code of Mil itary Justice (UCMJ): Article 85 ( Desertion , 1 specification), Article 86 ( Absence without leave , 2 specifications ), Article 87 (Missing movement, 1 specification), Article 117 (Provoking speeches and gestures, 1 specification), and Article 128 ( Assault , 2 specifications ) . Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement . However, per the Applicant’s DD Form 214, the Separation Code HKQ indicates the Applicant waived his right to an administrative board.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he was mentally and physically abused by members of his command, and his discharge was unjust. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that he was mentally and physically abused by members of his command, to include his chief. The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case. What is in the record is documentation of four NJPs for multiple serious offenses, each of which could have resulted in a punitive Bad Conduct Discharge as the result of a Special Court-Martial. Instead, his command leniently processed him for administrative discharge. During the separation proceedings, the Applicant waived his right to request a hearing before an Administrative Separation Board. If the Applicant believed there were mitigating circumstances, it was his obligation to contest those charges at the time they were made. During an Administrative Separation Board, he would have had the opportunity to mount a defense against the charges. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401302

Original file (ND1401302.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain MISCONDUCT (SERIOUS OFFENSE). ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200051

Original file (ND1200051.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade to receive G.I. The NDRB determined that his command gave the Applicant multiple opportunities to correct his behavior, ensured he received alcohol rehabilitation treatment, processed him for administrative separation instead of pursuing a punitive discharge that could have resulted in confinement and a Bad Conduct Discharge, and ultimately...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700619

Original file (ND0700619.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19960111 - 19660324 Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19960325 Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge: 19981203Length of Service: 2 Yrs 8Mths9 Dys Lost Time: Days UA: 89 Days...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200503

Original file (ND1200503.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks to improve his employment opportunities so he can support his family.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201096

Original file (ND1201096.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201532

Original file (ND1201532.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19991109 - 19991208Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19991209Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20030429Highest Rank/Rate:SM3Length of Service:Years Months21 DaysEducation Level:AFQT: 75EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(5)Behavior:2.2(5)OTA: 2.81Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Pistol...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200941

Original file (ND1200941.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests a change to his narrative reason for discharge from Misconduct to Administrative Separation. In the documentation that was sent to the Separation Authority for a decision on the characterization of service and narrative reason for discharge, the Applicant’s CO recommended that the Applicant be separated with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge for Personality Disorder. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101767

Original file (MD1101767.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20071231 - 20080615Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20080616Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20101019Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)4 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:77MOS: 0352Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):()/()Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201202

Original file (ND1201202.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Former service members are eligible for a review from the Naval Discharge Review Board of the propriety and equity of their characterization of service and narrative reason for separation for 15 years after their discharges. After a complete review of the records, the NDRB determined the discharge was warranted and was proper and equitable.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1002198

Original file (ND1002198.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Applicant seeks a discharge upgrade to obtain G.I. Although the Applicant’s service records are incomplete (missing administrative separation documentation to include: notification of administrative separation and acknowledgment of rights forms, commanding officer comments and endorsement, and the Separation Authority decision letter), the Board completed a thorough review of...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400732

Similar Decisions