Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200051
Original file (ND1200051.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AA, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20111004
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20050713 - 20050719     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20050720     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20070831      Highest Rank/Rate: AN
Length of Service: Y ear s M onth 11 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 87
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 2.0 ( 2 )      Behavior: 2.0 ( 2 )        OTA: 2.50

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):     

Periods of C ONF :

NJP :

- 20060608 :      Article (Absence without leave)
         Article (Failure to obey order or regulation)
          Article (False official statement)
         Awarded: Suspended: (Extracted from CO’s ltr dtd 20070824)

- 20061210 :      Article (Failure to obey order or regulation)
         Awarded : Oral reprimand Susp ended: (Extracted from CO’s ltr dtd 20070824)

- 20070801 :      Article (Absence without leave)
         Article (Failure to obey order or regulation)
          Awarded: Suspended: (Extracted from CO’s ltr dtd 20070824)

S CM :            SPCM:             Retention Warning Counseling :

C C :

- 20060520 :       Offense: Reckless driving, no license, expired inspection
         Sentence : $380.00 fine and $162.00 court cost (Extracted from CO’s ltr dtd 20070824)

- 20060521 :       Offense: Public intoxication
         Sentence : $96.00 fine (Extracted from CO’s ltr dtd 20070824)

- 20060529 :       Offense: Driving under the influence
         Sentence : 1 year suspended license, 90 days incarceration (suspended), two years probation, mandatory VASAP, and $470.00 (Extracted from CO’s ltr dtd 20070824)

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, 29 April 2005 until 14 May 2008, Article 1910-152, SEPARATION BY REASON OF ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.        The Applicant seeks an upgrade to receive G.I. Bill benefits.
2.       The Applicant contends he suffered from depression and frustration due to unfair treatment by his command .

Decision

Date: 20 1 2 1011             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion
The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Absence without leave, 2 specifications ), Article 92 ( Failure to obey order or regulation, 2 specifications ), and Article 107 ( False official statement ) and c ivil c onvictions for Reckless driving, no license, expired inspection , Public intoxication , and Driving under the influence . Based on his alcohol rehabilitation failure, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks an upgrade to receive G.I. Bill benefits. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits , and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he suffered from depression and frustration due to unfair treatment by his command. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention the command treated him unfairly. What the record does show is that the Applicant was found guilty of multiple UCMJ violations at three NJPs and had three civil convictions for alcohol - related violations . Despite attending alcohol rehabilitation treatment and being offered a continuing care plan, the Applicant had further alcohol-related incidents. With all of his misconduct in 2 years and 1 month of service, the Applicant met the requirements for administrative separation processing due to Misconduct (Commission of a Serious Offense), Pattern of Misconduct, and Misconduct (Civil Conviction) in addition to Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure. Separation for misconduct typically results in an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge. However, his command, after tolerating his poor behavior that resulted in three NJPs and three civil convictions, leniently recommended separation with a General for Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure. The NDRB determined that his command gave the Applicant multiple opportunities to correct his behavior, ensured he received alcohol rehabilitation treatment, processed him for administrative separation instead of pursuing a punitive discharge that could have resulted in confinement and a Bad Conduct Discharge, and ultimately recommended a very lenient General discharge. T he record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service . Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600227

    Original file (ND0600227.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND06-00227 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20051116. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. I’m asking for my discharge to be

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01306

    Original file (ND04-01306.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to “allow re-entry.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of her service, reflects her willful failure to meet the requirements of her contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of her...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600989

    Original file (ND0600989.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: NOTIFICATION PROCEDUREDate Notified:20050825Narrative Reason(s): MISCONDUCT - alcohol abuse rehabilitation failureLeast Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20050825Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board NOT APPLICABLEObtain Copies Submit Statement(s) GCMCA Review Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date): NOT APPLICABLESeparation Authority (date):COMMANDING OFFICER,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01231

    Original file (ND03-01231.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-01231 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030716. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to “Reasons Satisfactory to SECNAV.” The Applicant requests a documentary record review. [EXTRACTED FROM SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT.]

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00160

    Original file (ND02-00160.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00160 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 011203, requested that the reason for the discharge be changed to erroneous discharge with a RE-1 or 3 code. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing and that the NDRB does not have the authority to change a reenlistment code. Applicant did not object to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00022

    Original file (ND00-00022.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00022 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 991007, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to Secretarial Authority. Command level counseling.960613: Civilian Conviction: Driving under the influence of alcohol. 970212: Commanding Officer, Assault Craft Unit One, advised BUPERS that applicant was discharged on 13 Feb 97 with a general (under honorable conditions) by...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601087

    Original file (ND0601087.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Equity – In Service Conduct Summary of Service:Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19990219 - 19990630 Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19990701Years Contracted:; Date of Discharge: 20020509 Length of Service: Active: 02Yrs 10 Mos 09 Days Does not exclude lost time, if any. Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation 20000419: Civil Conviction: General District Court, Traffic Division, Chesapeake, Virginia for...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600558

    Original file (MD0600558.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Not appealed.970709: Forfeiture of pay and reduction in pay grade awarded at NJP vacated due to continued misconduct.970709: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: UA from 1630, 970522 to 0700, 970528.Violation of UCMJ, Article 107: Dismissed. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Marine Corps and falls far short of that required for an upgrade...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700131

    Original file (ND0700131.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Improper2. The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500769

    Original file (ND0500769.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. CA action 971119: Sentence approved and ordered executed.980422: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence (3 Specs). The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards