Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400093
Original file (ND1400093.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-EO3, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20131025
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:       UNDER MEDICAL CONDITIONS

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20011106 - 20011128     Active:            20011129 - 2006 11 26

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20061127     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20090129      Highest Rank/Rate: EO3
Length of Service: Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 03 D a y ( s )
 Education Level:        AFQT: 64
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.0 ( 2 )      Behavior: 2.0 ( 2 )        OTA: 3.05

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):     

Periods of UA /C ONF : UA: 20080103-20081124, 327 days / CONF:

NJP :     S CM :    SPCM:    C C :      Retention Warning Counseling :

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

          Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, should read: “ NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM SERVICE MEDAL , SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON (4), GOOD CONDUCT MEDAL, IRAQ CAMPAIGN MEDAL WITH FMF DEVICE, LETTER OF COMMENDATION ”
         “ CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 011129 UNTIL 061126 ”

The NDRB will recommen d to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, PERS-312A, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:           Service/Medical Record:           Other Records:  

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation:           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:           From/To Representation:           From/To Congress member:        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective 31 May 2005 until Present, Article 1910-106, SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(b), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .
C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       The Applicant seeks access to Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits.
2.       The Applicant contends he was unknowingly suffering from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and was under tremendous pressures from his family and the short amount of time between returning from Iraq and going to his new command when he made the decision to go into an unauthorized absence (UA) status.
 3.       The Applicant contends his post-service conduct and treatment for PTSD warrants consideration for an upgrade.

Decision

Date: 20 1 4 0403             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 As a result of the Applicant’s claim of PTSD, in accordance with U.S. Code, Title X, Section 1553 (d)(1), the Naval Discharge Review Board included a member who is a physician, clinical psychologist, or psychiatrist. In accordance with section 1553 (d)(2), the service secretary expedited a final decision and accorded the case sufficient priority to achieve an expedited resolution. The Applicant’s service record documents completion of a deployment to Iraq from March to October 2006, conducting combat support operations in support of Operation IRAQI FREEDOM.

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. However, the Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service in his second enlistment included no retention warnings, nonjudicial punishments (NJPs), or courts-martial for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). However, the Applicant did go into a UA status for 327 days. Facing a Special Court-Martial for this violation, the Applicant requested separation in lieu of trial by court-martial (SILT). Per regulations, to attain approval for a SILT request, service members must have been afforded the opportunity to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement. They must also fully understand the elements of the offense(s) for which they were charged, and they must admit their guilt. They further certify a complete understanding of the negative consequences of their actions and that characterization of service could be Under Other Than Honorable Conditions, which might deprive them of virtually all veterans benefits based upon their current enlistment. The Navy approved his request and discharged him Under Other Than Honorable Conditions for Separation In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial.

Issue 1: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks access to VA benefits. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits, and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he was unknowingly suffering from PTSD and was under tremendous pressures from his family and the short amount of time between returning from Iraq and going to his new command when he made the decision to go into a UA status. The Applicant submitted documentation of civilian and VA PTSD treatment that started in October 2009 and continues to the present. Though the Applicant may feel that PTSD was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record reflects willful misconduct that demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. After a complete review of the records and documentation submitted by the Applicant, the NDRB determined PTSD did not mitigate his misconduct, and his discharge was warranted, proper, and equitable. Relief denied.


: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his post-service conduct and treatment for PTSD warrants consideration for an upgrade. The NDRB considers outstanding post-service conduct to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. The Applicant provided a personal statement , post-service civilian and VA PTSD treatment records , and a letter from the VA that establishes the Applicant’s veteran’s preference for civil service employment (this was based on his first enlistment, which was Honorable) . The Applicant could have provided documentation as detailed in the Post-Service Conduct paragraph in the Addendum , however, completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post-service conduct establishes that the in-service misconduct was an aberration. T he Board determined the characterization of service received was appropriate considering the length of service and period of unauthorized absence. Relief denied.
Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801669

    Original file (ND0801669.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20000619 - 20010524Active: USNR (DEP20001091 - 20011028 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20011029Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20060811Length of Service: Years Months13 DaysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 55Highest Rank/Rate:EO3EvaluationMarks:Performance:1.0 Behavior:4.0OTA: 1.72Awards and Decorations (per DD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301886

    Original file (ND1301886.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20050722 - 20050728Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20050729Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20100223Highest Rank/Rate: EO3Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 26 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 43EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.5(6)Behavior:2.7(6)OTA: 2.99Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Rifle...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100097

    Original file (ND1100097.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19980219 - 19980525Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19980526Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20001012Highest Rank/Rate:EO3Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)17 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 32/45EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(5)Behavior:3.2(5)OTA: 3.24Awards and Decorations (per DD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700696

    Original file (ND0700696.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post- service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201725

    Original file (ND1201725.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400759

    Original file (ND1400759.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the offense committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700418

    Original file (ND0700418.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Recommendation: NA.20031021: Medical Record: Reason for visit: Administrative separation physical for desertion. Recommendation: NA Discharge Process Charge(s) and Specification(s):NOT FOUND IN RECORDDate Applicant Submitted SILT request: NOT FOUND IN RECORDCommanding Officer Recommendation (date): Separation Authority (date): NOT FOUND IN RECORDDate Applicant Discharged: 20031028 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to Military Service: Service and/or...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001582

    Original file (ND1001582.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USAR 20031201-20040524 HONActive: 20000718-20031130 HON Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20040525Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20070607Highest Rank/Rate:EO3Length of Service: Years Months14 DaysLength of Service: Inactive: Year(s)Month(s) 13 Day(s) Active Year(s)Month(s) 13 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000865

    Original file (ND1000865.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ”...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200390

    Original file (ND1200390.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant wants to be eligible for education benefits.2. Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In...